A technique for characterising feature size and quality of manifolds

Effective dimension reduction is a key factor in facilitating large-scale simulation of high-dimensional dynamical systems. The behaviour of low-dimensional surrogate models often relies on accurate reconstruction of quantities that can be nonlinear functions of the original parameters. For instance, in low-dimensional combustion models, source terms representative of complex chemical kinetics must be modelled accurately in the reduced dimensional space in order to yield accurate predictions. Features such as sharp gradients or non-uniqueness in a quantity of interest (QoI) may be introduced through parameterisation and pose difficulties for reconstruction techniques. Many existing manifold quality assessments do not consider these features and limit examination to the original parameters and low-dimensional embedding. We have developed a technique for quantitatively assessing manifold quality through characterising the feature size of QoIs by monitoring the change in variance over an increasing filter width. Through the identification of variance at small scales, this technique detects undesirable sharp gradients and non-uniqueness of QoIs. Our technique is not limited to a specific reduction method and can be used to compare or assess manifold parameterisations in arbitrary dimensions. We demonstrate our technique on combustion data from both simulation and experiment.

[1]  Amir Biglari,et al.  A filter-independent model identification technique for turbulent combustion modeling , 2012 .

[2]  W. Härdle Applied Nonparametric Regression , 1992 .

[3]  James C. Sutherland,et al.  A quantitative method for a priori evaluation of combustion reaction models , 2007 .

[4]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2021, Computer Vision.

[5]  Tarek Echekki,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition analysis of autoignition simulation data of nonhomogeneous hydrogen-air mixtures , 2006 .

[6]  Nasser Darabiha,et al.  Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion , 2000 .

[7]  H. Zha,et al.  Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via tangent space alignment , 2004, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[8]  A. Buja,et al.  Local Multidimensional Scaling for Nonlinear Dimension Reduction, Graph Drawing, and Proximity Analysis , 2009 .

[9]  R. Barlow,et al.  Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames , 1998 .

[10]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[11]  Jiancheng Lv,et al.  Angle-based embedding quality assessment method for manifold learning , 2019, Neural Computing and Applications.

[12]  Isao Noda,et al.  Scaling techniques to enhance two-dimensional correlation spectra , 2008 .

[13]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[14]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[15]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Image Manifolds by Semidefinite Programming , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[16]  T. Echekki,et al.  A framework for data-based turbulent combustion closure: A posteriori validation , 2019 .

[17]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Hessam Mirgolbabaei,et al.  Principal component transport in turbulent combustion: A posteriori analysis , 2015 .

[19]  Hessam Mirgolbabaei,et al.  Nonlinear reduction of combustion composition space with kernel principal component analysis , 2014 .

[20]  N. Smaoui,et al.  A nonlinear principal component analysis approach for turbulent combustion composition space , 2014 .

[21]  Alessandro Parente,et al.  Combustion modeling using principal component analysis , 2009 .

[22]  Axel Coussement,et al.  Combustion modeling using Principal Component Analysis: A posteriori validation on Sandia flames D, E and F , 2020, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.

[23]  Jiaxi Liang,et al.  A New Method for Performance Analysis in Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2020, Stat. Anal. Data Min..

[24]  S. Pope Small scales, many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion , 2013 .

[25]  Jarkko Venna,et al.  Local multidimensional scaling , 2006, Neural Networks.

[26]  K. Boulouchos,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition of direct numerical simulation data: Data reduction and observer construction , 2000 .

[27]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Empirical low-dimensional manifolds in composition space , 2012 .

[28]  Alessandro Parente,et al.  Principal component analysis of turbulent combustion data: Data pre-processing and manifold sensitivity , 2013 .

[29]  Van Oijen,et al.  Modelling of Premixed Laminar Flames using Flamelet-Generated Manifolds , 2000 .

[30]  Bo Zhang,et al.  A new embedding quality assessment method for manifold learning , 2012, Neurocomputing.

[31]  D. Thévenin,et al.  Correlation analysis of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent non-premixed flames , 1998 .

[32]  Leonardo Tognotti,et al.  Investigation of the MILD combustion regime via Principal Component Analysis , 2009 .

[33]  Leonardo Tognotti,et al.  Identification of low-dimensional manifolds in turbulent flames , 2009 .

[34]  Jeremy N. Thornock,et al.  Advanced regression methods for combustion modelling using principal components , 2015 .

[35]  Axel Coussement,et al.  Kernel density weighted principal component analysis of combustion processes , 2012 .