Phylogenetic habitat filtering influences forest nucleation in grasslands

Because species-environment interactions are mediated by phenotypic tradeoffs, the maintenance of ancestral traits in some phylogenetic clades and the emergence of evolutionary novelties in others are likely to limit the types of habitats that species occupy, generating phylogenetic habitat filtering. To test for phylogenetic habitat filtering in woody sapling communities in vegetation patches scattered in southern Brazilian grasslands, I estimated if patches of different sizes encompassed species of different phylogenetic groups. I analyzed patch composition with principal coordinates of phylogenetic structure (PCPS), extracted from a matrix of phylogeny-weighted species composition, and compared these results against net relatedness index (NRI) analyses. NRI analysis revealed that most communities were phylogenetically random, and that patches of different sizes did not differ from each other with respect to NRI. The first four PCPS contained ≅ 91% of total variation in phylogeny-weighted species composition. In the first two PCPS, scores of large patches differed from those of small and medium patches, which did not differ from each other. Large patches were associated with basal plant clades, whereas small patches were mostly related to asterids, and medium patches were phylogenetically diverse. Phylogenetic habitat filtering was detected only by PCPS analysis, possibly because NRI analysis does not take into account the habitat specificity of species. Taking phylogenetic habitat filtering into account in comparative studies likely enhances our capability to understand the ways that plants interact with their environment.

[1]  Paul G. Wolf,et al.  A classification for extant ferns , 2006 .

[2]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. Hampp,et al.  Growth rate, photosynthetic activity, and leaf development of Brazil pine seedlings (Araucaria angustifolia[Bert.] O. Ktze.) , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[4]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[5]  G. A. Yarranton,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a primary succession: nucleation , 1974 .

[6]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Combining spatial and phylogenetic eigenvector filtering in trait analysis , 2009 .

[7]  L. Duarte,et al.  Ecophysiological responses of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae) seedlings to different irradiance levels. , 2000 .

[8]  T. Givnish On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity , 1999 .

[9]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III , 2009 .

[10]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO(2) and optimization of water-use efficiency among land plants. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[11]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Leaf hydraulic evolution led a surge in leaf photosynthetic capacity during early angiosperm diversification. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[12]  J. M. Oliveira,et al.  Vegetation dynamics on mosaics of Camposand Araucaria forest between 1974 and 1999 in Southern Brazil , 2004 .

[13]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[14]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[15]  T. Feild,et al.  The ecophysiology of early angiosperms. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[16]  N. Holbrook,et al.  HARDLY A RELICT: FREEZING AND THE EVOLUTION OF VESSELLESS WOOD IN WINTERACEAE , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  David C. Tank,et al.  An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: , 2009 .

[18]  Stephen P Hubbell,et al.  The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. , 2006, Ecology.

[19]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[20]  V. Pillar,et al.  Role of nurse plants in Araucaria Forest expansion over grassland in south Brazil , 2006 .

[21]  J. Losos Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[22]  V. Pillar,et al.  Plant dispersal strategies and the colonization of Araucaria forest patches in a grassland-forest mosaic , 2007 .

[23]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: A NEW APPROACH TO STUDYING THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONS , 1985 .

[24]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[25]  Michael J. Donoghue,et al.  A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[27]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics1[W][OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[28]  V. Pillar,et al.  What saplings can tell us about forest expansion over natural grasslands , 2006 .

[29]  C. Graham,et al.  Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology , 2005 .

[30]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Kevin McConway,et al.  Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. , 2006, Ecology.

[32]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  SWAP ALGORITHMS IN NULL MODEL ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[33]  Jonathan B. Losos,et al.  Phylogenetic Perspectives on Community Ecology , 1996 .

[34]  László Orlóci,et al.  On randomization testing in vegetation science: multifactor comparisons of relevé groups , 1996 .

[35]  T. Garland,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods , 2002 .

[36]  V. Pillar,et al.  A framework for metacommunity analysis of phylogenetic structure. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[37]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[38]  J. Gower Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis , 1966 .

[39]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction , 1995 .