Trade-off Pareto optimum design of an innovative curved damper truss moment frame considering structural and non-structural objectives

Abstract This research aims to develop a novel and cost-effective seismic force-resisting system called “curved damper truss moment frame” (CDTMF) by coupling the recently developed curved dampers (CDs) with conventional steel trusses. In this proposed system, the CDs are adopted as primary fuses, while semi-rigid connections are used as secondary fuses to dissipate the input seismic energy through a two-phased energy dissipation mechanism called the equivalent energy design procedure (EEDP). To validate the adequacy and feasibility of incorporating the CDTMF system in multi-story framed structures, the multi-objective NSGA II optimization technique was applied to the optimum seismic design of selected CDTMF prototypes. Their seismic performance was then compared with the recently proposed buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frame (BRKBTMF) systems, which were designed based on the same procedure to make a consistent comparison. This comparison was based on the results of nonlinear static analysis (pushover), nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) on three-, six- and nine-story steel framed structures (low- to mid-rise systems). Since damage to non-structural acceleration-sensitive elements would depend on the floor acceleration, and because the main cause of damage in non-structural displacement-sensitive elements and structural members is generally due to the story drift, the objective functions of the optimization process were the median maximum story drift and the peak floor acceleration. In order to achieve the two-phased energy dissipation mechanism, the primary constraints (PCs) and secondary constraints (SCs) corresponding to the primary and secondary fuses are applied. The outcomes of the pushover analysis showed that the optimal CDTMF structures exhibited higher ductility and energy dissipation capacity compared to the BRKBTMFs. The results of the nonlinear dynamic analysis also indicated that the newly proposed CDTMF system can control the roof displacement, story drift, and roof acceleration during an earthquake excitation more efficiently than the BRKBTMF system. Finally, the outputs of the IDA show that the CDTMFs can fulfilled the FEMA P695 code requirements. Hence, it can be considered as a reliable seismic force resisting system.

[1]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[2]  A. R. Vosoughi,et al.  The effects of rehabilitation objectives on near optimal trade-off relation between minimum weight and maximum drift of 2D steel X-braced frames considering soil-structure interaction using a cluster-based NSGA II , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[3]  Ali Kheyroddin,et al.  Cyclic behaviour of steel ring filled with compressive plastic or concrete, installed in the concentric bracing system , 2019, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering.

[4]  Yuanjie Li,et al.  Seismic Performance Evaluation of Long-Span Conventional Moment Frames and Buckling-Restrained Knee-Braced Truss Moment Frames , 2016 .

[5]  Izuru Takewaki Building Control with Passive Dampers: Optimal Performance-based Design for Earthquakes , 2009 .

[6]  Dagen Weng,et al.  Theoretical analysis and experimental research on toggle-brace-damper system considering different installation modes , 2012 .

[7]  Yuanjie Li,et al.  Performance assessment of innovative seismic resilient steel knee braced frame , 2016 .

[8]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Performance-based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures , 2012, Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering: New Applications.

[9]  Pennung Warnitchai,et al.  Seismic Design and Behavior of Ductile Knee-Braced Moment Frames , 2011 .

[10]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Simultaneous optimal damper placement using oil, hysteretic and inertial mass dampers , 2013 .

[11]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Dual hysteretic damper system effective for broader class of earthquake ground motions , 2018 .

[12]  Genshu Tong,et al.  Performance‐based plastic design and collapse assessment of diagrid structure fused with shear link , 2019, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.

[13]  Chris D. Poland,et al.  ASCE 41-13: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2012 .

[14]  Ali Kheyroddin,et al.  Evaluating the performance of OBS-C-O in steel frames under monotonic load , 2015 .

[15]  M. Ahmadizadeh,et al.  Modified sliding mode design of passive viscous fluid control systems for nonlinear structures , 2018 .

[16]  Yuanjie Li,et al.  Performance-Based Design and Optimization of Buckling Restrained Knee Braced Truss Moment Frame , 2014 .

[17]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Seismic design of steel frames using multi-objective optimization , 2013 .

[18]  D. P. Tung,et al.  Equivalent Energy Design Procedure for Earthquake Resilient Fused Structures , 2017 .

[19]  Sutat Leelataviwat,et al.  Cyclic testing and performance evaluation of buckling-restrained knee-braced frames , 2018, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[20]  Sudhir K. Jain,et al.  Design of non-structural elements for buildings : A review of codal provisions , 2005 .

[21]  Mehdi Ebadi Jamkhaneh,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame with U-Shaped Metallic Yielding Damper , 2018, International Journal of Steel Structures.

[22]  H.-L. Hsu,et al.  Improving seismic performance of framed structures with steel curved dampers , 2017 .

[23]  D. P. Tung,et al.  Performance-Based Seismic Design and Evaluation of Fused Steel Diagrid Frame , 2018, Earthquake Spectra.

[24]  Mohammad Reza Banan,et al.  An improved multi-objective optimization approach for performance-based design of structures using nonlinear time-history analyses , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  H.-L. Hsu,et al.  Brace performance with steel curved dampers and amplified deformation mechanisms , 2018, Engineering Structures.