On the Use of Experimental Observations to Bias Simulated Ensembles.

Historically, experimental measurements have been used to bias biomolecular simulations toward structures compatible with those observations via the addition of ad hoc restraint terms. We show how the maximum entropy formalism provides a principled approach to enforce concordance with these measurements in a minimally biased way, yielding restraints that are linear functions of the target observables and specifying a straightforward scheme to determine the biasing weights. These restraints are compared with instantaneous and ensemble-averaged harmonic restraint schemes, illustrating their similarities and limitations.

[1]  David Chandler,et al.  Transition path sampling: throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark. , 2002, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[2]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  J. Pitera,et al.  Assessing the effect of conformational averaging on the measured values of observables , 2001, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[4]  A. Liwo,et al.  Maximum entropy approach to the determination of solution conformation of flexible polypeptides by global conformational analysis and NMR spectroscopy – Application to DNS1-c-[d-A2bu2, Trp4,Leu5]- enkephalin and DNS1-c-[d-A2bu2, Trp4, d-Leu5]enkephalin , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[5]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[6]  M. Nilges,et al.  Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography and solution NMRspectroscopy , 1993, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[7]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Determination of force field parameters for molecular simulation by molecular simulation: An application of the weak-coupling method , 1995 .

[8]  R. Brunne,et al.  Structure refinement using time-averaged J-coupling constant restraints , 1993, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[9]  W F van Gunsteren,et al.  A protein structure from nuclear magnetic resonance data. lac repressor headpiece. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  W. Vangunsteren,et al.  CONFORMATIONAL DYNAMICS DETECTED BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE NOE VALUES AND J-COUPLING CONSTANTS , 1988 .

[11]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Determination of protein structures consistent with NMR order parameters. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  W. F. Gunsteren,et al.  Structure refinement with molecular dynamics and a Boltzmann-weighted ensemble , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[14]  L. Mead,et al.  Maximum entropy in the problem of moments , 1984 .

[15]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[16]  X. Salvatella,et al.  The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[17]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Movies S1 to S5 Inferential Structure Determination , 2022 .

[18]  P A Kollman,et al.  Are time-averaged restraints necessary for nuclear magnetic resonance refinement? A model study for DNA. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  H. Schwalbe,et al.  Structure and dynamics of the homologous series of alanine peptides: a joint molecular dynamics/NMR study. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  G. Hummer,et al.  SAXS ensemble refinement of ESCRT-III CHMP3 conformational transitions. , 2011, Structure.