Implementing comprehensive plans: indicators for a task-sheet based performance evaluation process

Evaluation in spatial planning aims to raise effectiveness of plans as well as efficiency in planning processes. Given that research regarding evaluation of performance and especially plan implementation is sparse, this study presents a minimal set of indicators for a task-sheet based performance evaluation approach for Swiss cantonal comprehensive plans. Thematic task-sheets are a promising characteristic of cantonal comprehensive plans. They translate the comprehensive planning strategy into concrete evaluable tasks. The presented indicators allow assessing procedural efficiency of coordination and implementation of planning tasks (performance). We argue that if task-sheets comply with certain plan quality characteristics, a task-sheet based performance evaluation approach can support the effectiveness of plans and promote the objectives of the planning strategy. We point out plan content and characteristics necessary for effective execution of our approach. As a result, our findings can serve as a framework for designing evaluation processes for comprehensive planning documents beyond Switzerland.

[1]  Emily Talen,et al.  Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning , 1996 .

[2]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[3]  M. Luzius.  Die institutionelle Einbettung der Evaluationsfunktion in der Schweiz , 2009 .

[4]  Measuring Quality in Cantonal Guiding Planning in Switzerland , 2003 .

[5]  P. Berke,et al.  What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers , 2004 .

[6]  Barbara Schultz,et al.  Sustainable planning instruments through indicator-based controlling tools , 2003 .

[7]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[8]  Craig Watkins,et al.  Conceptualising spatial planning outcomes: Towards an integrative measurement framework , 2009 .

[9]  Philip Berke,et al.  Searching for the Good Plan , 2009 .

[10]  Marco Keiner,et al.  Wie nachhaltig ist die Raumentwicklung der Kantone? , 2002 .

[11]  K. Bogenschneider,et al.  Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers , 2010 .

[12]  Cecilia Wong,et al.  Decision-making and problem-solving: Turning indicators into a double-loop evaluation framework , 2011 .

[13]  Peter Dahler-Larsen.  The Evaluation Society , 2011 .

[14]  E. R. Alexander.  Evaluating planning: what is successful planning and (how) can we measure it? , 2012 .

[15]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  The Performance of Spatial Planning , 2000 .

[16]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[17]  V. Maclaren.  Urban Sustainability Reporting , 1996 .

[18]  Philip Berke,et al.  What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand , 2006 .

[19]  K. Schedler,et al.  Outcome-Oriented Public Management: A Responsibility-Based Approach to the New Public Management , 2010 .

[20]  Janet Crawford,et al.  Evaluating the Outcomes of Plans: Theory, Practice, and Methodology , 2010 .

[21]  T. Clark,et al.  Political Culture , 2016 .

[22]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  A decision-centred view of environmental planning , 1987 .