Sampling, Recruitment, and Retention in a Bereavement Intervention Study: Experiences from the Living after Loss Project

This article reports on the sampling and recruitment challenges, as well as the strategies used to address them in the Living After Loss (LAL) project, a bereavement intervention study conducted in Salt Lake City and San Francisco comparing two 14-week group conditions with follow-up. We encountered three major challenges: 1) difficulty determining eligibility for some potential participants who were contacted, 2) locating and recruiting nonwhites, and 3) unavailable phone numbers for approximately one-third of those we attempted to contact. Despite these challenges, we achieved a 42% response rate with a sample size of 328 participants comprising 15% non-white. Eighty-five percent of the participants completed all of the follow-up data points. Leading factors in participants' decisions to join and remain in the study were 1) opportunities to obtain help and support, 2) to potentially help other bereaved individuals, 3) to contribute to research, and 4) their on-going interactions with a professional, empathetic, and culturally sensitive project staff. Effectively focusing recruitment efforts and carefully and systematically training research staff were among the most effective strategies we employed and therefore suggest for those planning similar investigations.

[1]  Julian V. Luke,et al.  Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007. , 2009, National health statistics reports.

[2]  C. Konnert,et al.  Ethical Issues in the Study of Bereavement: the Opinions of Bereaved Adults , 2007, Death studies.

[3]  M. Caserta,et al.  Toward the Development of an Inventory of Daily Widowed Life (IDWL): Guided by the Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement , 2007, Death studies.

[4]  D. gallagher-Thompson,et al.  Recruiting Chinese Americans for dementia caregiver intervention research: suggestions for success. , 2006, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[5]  T. J. Mc Callum,et al.  Enhancing the matching model of recruitment through focus groups , 2006, Aging & mental health.

[6]  G. McDougall,et al.  Recruiting and Retaining an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Older Adults in a Longitudinal Intervention Study , 2006, Educational gerontology.

[7]  M. Caserta,et al.  Promoting Self-Care and Daily Living Skills among Older Widows and Widowers: Evidence from the Pathfinders Demonstration Project , 2004 .

[8]  S. Stahl,et al.  Approaches to Improving Recruitment and Retention of Minority Elders Participating in Research , 2004, Journal of aging and health.

[9]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Bereavement research: methodological issues and ethical concerns , 2003, Palliative medicine.

[10]  H. Schut,et al.  The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. , 1999, Death studies.

[11]  M. Rose,et al.  Recruiting research participants: a comparison of the costs and effectiveness of five recruitment strategies. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[12]  M. Caserta,et al.  Future Directions in Adult Bereavement Research , 1998 .

[13]  D. Morgan,et al.  Use of Public Records to Compare Respondents and Nonrespondents in a Study of Recent Widows , 1996 .

[14]  L. Anderson,et al.  Recruiting from the community: lessons learned from the diabetes care for older adults project. , 1995, The Gerontologist.

[15]  Frederick Wiseman,et al.  Comment on a Standard Definition of Response Rates , 1984 .

[16]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care , 2001 .

[17]  A. Cook The dynamics of ethical decision making in bereavement research. , 2001 .

[18]  P. Weitzman,et al.  Minority populations and psychophysiologic research: Challenges in trust building and recruitment , 2000 .