Task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations

BOZ is an automated graphic design and presentation tool that designs graphics based on an analysis of the task for which a graphic is intended to support. When designing a graphic, BOZ aims to optimize two ways in which graphics help expedite human performance of information-processing tasks: (1) allowing users to substitute simple perceptual inferences in place of more demanding logical inferences, and (2) streamlining users' search for needed information. BOZ analyzes a logical description of a task to be performed by a human user and designs a provably equivalent perceptual task by substituting perceptual inferences in place of logical inferences in the task description. BOZ then designs and renders an accompanying graphic that encodes and structures data such that performance of each perceptual inference is supported and visual search is minimized. BOZ produces a graphic along with a perceptual procedure describing how to use the graphic to complete the task. A key feature of BOZ's approach is that it is able to design different presentations of the same information customized to the requirements of different tasks. BOZ is used to design graphic presentations of airline schedule information to support five different airline reservation tasks. Reaction time studies done with real users for one task and graphic show that the BOZ-designed graphic significantly reduces users' performance time to the task. Regression analyses link the observed efficiency savings to BOZ's two key design principles: perceptual inference substitutions and pruning of visual search.

[1]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines , 1988, CACM.

[2]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[3]  George F. Jenks,et al.  THE USE OF SHADING PATTERNS IN GRADED SERIES1 , 1961 .

[4]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information , 1986, TOGS.

[5]  S. Asch Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[6]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[7]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[8]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[9]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[10]  Sakunthala Gnanamgari Information presentation through default displays , 1981 .

[11]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[12]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Abstract Planning and Perceptual Chunks: Elements of Expertise in Geometry , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth 10, 000 word , 1987 .

[14]  M. Just,et al.  Understanding Machines from Text and Diagrams. , 1989 .

[15]  M. Teghtsoonian THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[17]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[18]  W. Hudson The Study of the Problem of Pictorial Perception Among Unacculturated Groups , 1967 .

[19]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Training High-Performance Skills: Fallacies and Guidelines , 1985 .

[20]  Hisao Yamada,et al.  An Analysis of the Standard English Keyboard , 1980, COLING.

[21]  David E. Coleman,et al.  Elements of Graphing Data , 1987 .

[22]  S S Stevens,et al.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. , 1946, Science.

[23]  Edward J. Lusk,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Style and Report Format on Task Performance: The MIS Design Consequences , 1979 .

[24]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  Graphics and Natural Language as Components of Automatic Explanation , 1988, SGCH.

[25]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Cognitive Efficiency Considerations for Good Graphic Design , 1989 .

[26]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  W. Cleveland,et al.  The elements of graphing data , 1985 .

[28]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  Task-analytic design of graphic presentations , 1990 .

[29]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[30]  Mark Friedell,et al.  Context-sensitive, graphic presentation of information , 1982, SIGGRAPH.

[31]  Frank Zdybel,et al.  An Information Presentation System , 1981, IJCAI.

[32]  Martin G. Helander,et al.  Emerging Office Automation Systems , 1985 .

[33]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  Graphics and natural language as components of automatic explanation , 1991 .