Deformation of prostate and seminal vesicles relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers.

PURPOSE To quantify the residual geometric uncertainties after on-line corrections with intraprostatic fiducial markers, this study analyzed the deformation of the prostate and, in particular, the seminal vesicles relative to such markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS A planning computed tomography (CT) scan and three repeat CT scans were obtained for 21 prostate cancer patients who had had three to four cylindrical gold markers placed. The prostate and whole seminal vesicles (clinical target volume [CTV]) were delineated on each scan at a slice thickness of 1.5 mm. Rigid body transformations (translation and rotation) mapping the markers onto the planning scan positions were obtained. The translation only (T(only)) or both translation and rotation were applied to the delineated CTVs. Next, the residue CTV surface displacements were determined using nonrigid registration of the delineated contours. For translation and rotation of the CTV, the residues represented deformation; for T(only), the residues stemmed from deformation and rotation. T(only) represented the residues for most currently applied on-line protocols. The patient and population statistics of the CTV surface displacements were calculated. The intraobserver delineation variation was similarly quantified using repeat delineations for all patients and corrected for. RESULTS The largest CTV deformations were observed at the anterior and posterior side of the seminal vesicles (population average standard deviation </=3 mm). Prostate deformation was small (standard deviation </=1 mm). The increase in these deviations when neglecting rotation (T(only)) was small. CONCLUSION Although prostate deformation with respect to implanted fiducial markers was small, the corresponding deformation of the seminal vesicles was considerable. Adding marker-based rotational corrections to on-line translation corrections provided a limited reduction in the estimated planning margins.

[1]  W. van Putten,et al.  Sexual function after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from a dose-escalation trial. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Yoshiya Yamada,et al.  Long-term outcome of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J C Stroom,et al.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J Bijhold,et al.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  B. Heijmen,et al.  A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Marco van Vulpen,et al.  Analysis of fiducial marker-based position verification in the external beam radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Luca Incrocci,et al.  Stereographic targeting in prostate radiotherapy: speed and precision by daily automatic positioning corrections using kilovoltage/megavoltage image pairs. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  M. Hoogeman,et al.  Local anatomic changes in parotid and submandibular glands during radiotherapy for oropharynx cancer and correlation with dose, studied in detail with nonrigid registration. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Jake Van Dyk,et al.  Image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (IGART): Radiobiological and dose escalation considerations for localized carcinoma of the prostate. , 2005, Medical physics.

[15]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2007 , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Strategies to reduce the systematic error due to tumor and rectum motion in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  D. Yan,et al.  Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume? , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  CLINICAL STUDIES , 2022 .

[19]  Douglas L. Jones ICRU Report 50—Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy , 1994 .

[20]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  X-ray-assisted positioning of patients treated by conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of setup accuracy using implanted markers versus bony structures. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Hans C J de Boer,et al.  Application of the No Action Level (NAL) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.