Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: a qualitative case study

In response to the calls to improve and deepen scientific understanding and literacy, considerable effort has been invested in developing sustainable technology-enhanced learning environments to improve science inquiry. Research has provided important guidance for scaffolding learning in mathematics and science. However, these reports have provided relatively little insight into how the different types of scaffolds can (or should) be implemented in dynamic, everyday classroom settings. In this qualitative case study, we examined how students solve scientific problems in technology-enhanced classrooms and how peer-, teacher-, and technology-enhanced scaffolds influenced student inquiry. The results indicated that students manifested distinct inquiry patterns when solving scientific problems and integrated different types of scaffolds to facilitate inquiry activities. These findings suggest that to support scientific inquiry in problem-solving contexts, technology-enhanced scaffolds are effective when supported by clear project goals, relevant evidence, peer- and teacher-assessments, and exemplars of knowledge articulation.

[1]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative research in practice : examples for discussion and analysis , 2002 .

[2]  William R. Robinson.  The Inquiry Wheel, an Alternative to the Scientific Method. A View of the Science Education Research Literature , 2004 .

[3]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: theoretical, empirical, and design issues , 2008 .

[4]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[6]  Carolyn W. Keys,et al.  Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .

[7]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. , 1997 .

[8]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[9]  D. Suthers,et al.  “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry , 2002 .

[10]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom , 2000 .

[11]  Chester E. Finn,et al.  Removing the Barriers for Teacher Candidates. , 2001 .

[12]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Designing authentic activities in web-based courses , 2004, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[13]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology , 1995 .

[14]  Allen Munro,et al.  Productivity tools for simulation-centered training development , 1992 .

[15]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[16]  Gail Richmond,et al.  Learners' perceptions of the role of peers in a research experience: Implications for the apprenticeship process, scientific inquiry, and collaborative work , 2008 .

[17]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[18]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[19]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[20]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume III , 2009 .

[21]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching , 1989 .

[22]  W. Dockrell,et al.  Rethinking educational research , 1980 .

[23]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms , 2005 .

[24]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[25]  D. Perkins,et al.  Informal reasoning and education , 1991 .

[26]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  A design framework for educational hypermedia systems: theory, research, and learning emerging scientific conceptual perspectives , 2008 .

[27]  Mark Windschitl.  Guest editorial: The future of science teacher preparation in America: Where is the evidence to inform program design and guide responsible policy decisions? , 2005 .

[28]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning. , 2000 .

[29]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development , 1997 .

[30]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[31]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[32]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing for Knowledge Integration: The Impact of Instructional Time , 2003 .

[33]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study , 2001 .

[34]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard , 2003 .

[35]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[36]  S. Erduran,et al.  Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .

[37]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Synergy: A Complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[38]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding , 2005 .

[39]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions , 2003 .

[40]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science , 2008 .

[41]  Herbert D. Thier,et al.  A New Look at Elementary School Science; Science Curriculum Improvement Study , 1967 .

[42]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .

[43]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[44]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[45]  Minchi Kim,et al.  Designing Online Learning Environments to Support Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[46]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[47]  K. Sahl,et al.  Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture , 2002 .

[48]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  WISE design for knowledge integration , 2003 .

[49]  P. Burger.  Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2001 .

[50]  Candace Schau,et al.  Gender differences in science attitude‐achievement relationships over time among white middle‐school students , 2002 .

[51]  Alberto J. Rodriguez.  The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's national science education standards , 1997 .

[52]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[53]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools in Science Education: An Emerging Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Practice. , 2007 .

[54]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Questions and Answers about Radical Constructivism , 2012 .

[55]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[56]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners , 2002 .

[57]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[58]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  Instructional Scaffolding: Reading and Writing as Natural Language Activities , 1983, Language Arts.

[59]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. , 1997 .

[60]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  The Role of Dialogue in Providing Scaffolded Instruction , 1986 .

[61]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Practice of constructivism in science education , 1993 .

[62]  Lauren B. Adamson,et al.  DOING A SCIENCE PROJECT : GENDER DIFFERENCES DURING CHILDHOOD , 1998 .

[63]  J. Kolodner,et al.  Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design , 2005 .

[64]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[65]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[66]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  The ideal of Standards and the reality of schools : Needed research , 2001 .

[67]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science , 2001 .

[68]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality , 2008 .

[69]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students' achievement in molecular genetics , 2008 .

[70]  A. Schoenfeld.  On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. , 1991 .

[71]  S. Barab,et al.  Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building , 2000 .

[72]  Christine Chin.  Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking , 2006 .

[73]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform , 2004 .