Social innovations in outsourcing: An empirical investigation of impact sourcing companies in India

Explores individual-level motivational triggers of impact sourcing entrepreneurship.Explains the entrepreneurial actions underpinning different phases of venture creation.Personalized values are central to the creation and development of impact sourcing companies.Intense periods of embedding and robust alliances with local partners help scale and sustain the business model.'Social' encoding and mimicry could determine the future commitment to marginalized communities. Impact sourcing - the practice of bringing digitally-enabled outsourcing jobs to marginalized individuals - is an important emerging social innovation in the outsourcing industry. The impact sourcing model of delivering Information Technology and Business Process Outsourcing (IT-BPO) services not only seeks to deliver business value for clients, but is also driven by an explicit social mission to help marginalized communities enjoy the benefits of globalization. This dual focus has led to the ambitious claim that social value creation can be integral to (and not always by-products of) innovative IT-BPO models. Given the relative newness of the impact sourcing business model there is scarce research about how impact sourcing companies emerge and the process through which entrepreneurs build and operate such companies. This paper draws on a qualitative study of seven Indian impact sourcing companies and develops a process model of the individual-level motivational triggers of impact sourcing entrepreneurship, the entrepreneurial actions underpinning different phases of venture creation and the positive institutional-level influences on impact sourcing. The paper argues that since deeply personalized values are central to the creation and development of impact sourcing companies, the business model may not be easy to replicate. The analysis highlights an intensive period of embedding and robust alliances with local partners as crucial for the scalability and sustainability of the impact sourcing business model. It also emphasizes the role of 'social' encoding and mimicry in determining the extent to which impact sourcing companies are able to retain their commitment to marginalized communities.

[1]  Matthew Kutz,et al.  What Is Contextual Intelligence , 2017 .

[2]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[3]  Faten Gazzah.  Entrepreneurship and regional development : spatial analysis , 2017 .

[4]  Jeffrey A. Robinson.  Navigating Social and Institutional Barriers to Markets: How Social Entrepreneurs Identify and Evaluate Opportunities , 2006 .

[5]  Roger Spear,et al.  Social entrepreneurship: a different model? , 2006 .

[6]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[7]  P. Corner,et al.  How Opportunities Develop in Social Entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[8]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  Collective Social Entrepreneurship: Collaboratively Shaping Social Good , 2012 .

[9]  Walter Isaacson,et al.  The real leadership lessons of Steve Jobs. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[10]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process , 2002 .

[12]  A. Pucihar,et al.  Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library ( AISeL ) BLED 2012 – , 2017 .

[13]  Richard Heeks.  Information technology impact sourcing , 2013, CACM.

[14]  B. Nicholson,et al.  Assessing the Social Development Potential of Impact Sourcing , 2016 .

[15]  Timothy J. Vogus,et al.  Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship , 2012 .

[16]  Maija Renko,et al.  Early Challenges of Nascent Social Entrepreneurs , 2012 .

[17]  Francesco Perrini,et al.  A process-based view of social entrepreneurship: From opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano , 2010 .

[18]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Social outsourcing as a development tool: The impact of outsourcing IT services to women's social enterprises in Kerala , 2009 .

[19]  Julie Battilana,et al.  Combining Social Welfare and Market Logics: What Drives Social Performance in Socioeconomic Hybrids? , 2012 .

[20]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada , 2004 .

[21]  Boris Groysberg,et al.  Manage your work, manage your life. (cover story) , 2014 .

[22]  Ann C. Svendsen,et al.  Convening Stakeholder Networks A New Way of Thinking, Being and Engaging , 2005 .

[23]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[24]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Pedagogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands , 2012 .

[25]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Ann C. Svendsen,et al.  Convening Stakeholder Networks , 2005 .

[28]  Craig V. VanSandt,et al.  Enabling the Original Intent: Catalysts for Social Entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[29]  Uday M. Apte,et al.  Global Disaggregation of Information-Intensive Services , 1995 .

[30]  Erran Carmel,et al.  The Impact of Impact Sourcing: Framing a Research Agenda , 2014, Information Systems Outsourcing.

[31]  J. Mair,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight , 2006 .

[32]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid - Implications for MNEs? , 2014 .

[33]  S. Sarasvathy.  Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency , 2001 .

[34]  Satyajit Majumdar,et al.  Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research , 2014 .

[35]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Impact Sourcing: Employing Prison Inmates to Perform Digitally-enabled Business Services , 2014, CAIS.

[36]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Ultra-low-cost computing and developing countries , 2013, CACM.

[37]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[38]  D. Snow,et al.  Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. , 1986 .

[39]  Muhammad Yunus,et al.  Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism That Serves Humanity's Most Pressing Needs , 2010 .

[40]  JUDITH M. BROWN,et al.  Gandhi's Rise to Power: Indian Politics 1915-1922 , 1972, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[41]  Francesca Gino,et al.  The Microwork Solution: A New Approach to Outsourcing Can Support Economic Development—and Add to Your Bottom Line , 2012 .

[42]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics , 2013 .

[43]  M. N. Ravishankar,et al.  Impact sourcing ventures and local communities: a frame alignment perspective , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[44]  Shirin Madon,et al.  Social IT outsourcing and development: theorising the linkage , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  Hee-Kyung Ahn,et al.  Helping Fellow Beings , 2014, Psychological science.

[46]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Firm in a World of Outsourcing and Offshoring: The Organizational and Geographical Relocation of High-Value Company Functions , 2010 .

[47]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Information technology offshoring in India: a postcolonial perspective , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .