A study to guide breeding of new cultivars of organic cherry tomato following a consumer-driven approach.

Abstract Agricultural studies focusing on the development and/or improvement of new varieties of fruits and vegetables usually prioritize the productivity, disease resistance, response to fertilization, and higher nutrient content. However, new product development needs to take into account not only flavour preference, but also consumer preference for appearance since without tasting products, consumers have to make decisions based on the way a product looks. The present study evaluated the sensory characteristics and consumer preference of ten promising accessions of organic cherry tomato for fresh consumption aiming at identifying the sensory attributes related to appearance that contributed to consumer liking/disliking the fruit. More specifically, the objective of the study was to guide producers regarding the target appearance attributes that play a role on consumer acceptance of cherry tomatoes. Ten accessions of organic cherry tomatoes were evaluated by a trained panel using the QDA methodology, and also by 80 tomato consumers for the acceptance of appearance and intention to purchase. The results achieved after integrating these two data sets (from the trained panel and consumers) in a multidimensional map allowed the elucidation of consumer liking of tomatoes in relation to the appearance, i.e. drivers of liking/disliking were identified. Results revealed that tomatoes with round shape and red colour (reddish) (cultivar ENAS 1031, ENAS 1010, ‘Perinha Agua Branca’, Super Sweet, and ‘Joana’) were the most liked cherry tomatoes. Those genotypes were also liked by the smallest segment (17.5% of participants) but for them unusual shapes (oblong and pear), orange-yellow colour, and bigger size were also liked. Despite the small number of participants in this study (80 consumers), new shapes and colours for the organic cherry tomatoes could be considered promising alternatives in the Brazilian market, and can be an opportunity for the producers of the state of Rio de Janeiro.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Baldwin,et al.  Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. , 2000 .

[2]  Herbert Stone,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Practices , 1985 .

[3]  P. Jankowski,et al.  Genotypic difference in postharvest characteristics of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta and its hybrids), as a new commercial crop Part I. Sensory profiling and physicochemical differences , 2011 .

[4]  H. Macfie,et al.  1 – Integrating consumer responses to food products , 2007 .

[5]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization , 2012 .

[6]  M. Causse,et al.  Inheritance of Nutritional and Sensory Quality Traits in Fresh Market Tomato and Relation to Consumer Preferences , 2003 .

[7]  P. Stehle,et al.  Tomatoes, tomato products and lycopene in the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer: do we have the evidence from intervention studies? , 2006, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[8]  L. Johansson,et al.  Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions , 1999 .

[9]  Paula Varela,et al.  Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. , 2010 .

[10]  A. Kander.  Composition and flavor quality of fresh market tomatoes as influenced by some postharvest handling procedures , 1978 .

[11]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Consuming organic versus conventional vegetables: the effect on nutrient and contaminant intakes. , 2010, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[12]  Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária Anvisa.  Primeira edição do Formulário Nacional aprovada , 2005 .

[13]  S. Saha,et al.  Textural, nutritional and functional attributes in tomato genotypes for breeding better quality varieties. , 2010, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[14]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Consumer-driven product development in the kiwifruit industry , 2003 .

[15]  E. Baldwin,et al.  Internal Bruising Alters Aroma Volatile Profiles in Tomato Fruit Tissues , 2002 .

[16]  H. Macfie.  23 – Preference mapping and food product development , 2007 .

[17]  W. Willett.  Fruits, vegetables, and cancer prevention: turmoil in the produce section. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  Marcos David Ferreira,et al.  Perfil dos compradores de tomate de mesa em supermercados da região de Campinas , 2005 .

[19]  A. C. D. S. Abboud,et al.  Descritores quantitativos na determinação da divergência genética entre acessos de tomateiro do grupo cereja , 2008 .

[20]  H. Macfie,et al.  DESIGNS TO BALANCE THE EFFECT OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION AND FIRST-ORDER CARRY-OVER EFFECTS IN HALL TESTS , 1989 .

[21]  Halliday J.H. MacFie,et al.  Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the Southern Hemisphere , 1996 .

[22]  U. Hamm,et al.  Preferences and determinants for organic, conventional and conventional-plus products – The case of occasional organic consumers , 2011 .

[23]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  THE GENERATION OF SENSORY EXPECTATION BY EXTERNAL CUES AND ITS EFFECT ON SENSORY PERCEPTION AND HEDONIC RATINGS: A REVIEW , 1996 .

[24]  A. Chitarra,et al.  Pós colheita de frutas e hortaliças: fisiologia e manuseio , 2005 .

[25]  K. Grunert,et al.  Comparing methods for measuring consumer willingness to pay for a basic and an improved ready made soup product , 2009 .

[26]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Subjective and objective knowledge as determinants of organic vegetables consumption , 2010 .

[27]  R. Amadó,et al.  Development of a model for quality assessment of tomatoes and apricots , 2003 .

[28]  F. Ruiz-Beviá,et al.  Quantitative analysis of flavour volatiles detects differences among closely related traditional cultivars of tomato , 2005 .

[29]  A. Salvador,et al.  How information about fibre (traditional and resistant starch) influences consumer acceptance of muffins , 2008 .

[30]  J. Prohens,et al.  Breeding strategies for improving the performance and fruit quality of the pepino (Solanum muricatum): A model for the enhancement of underutilized exotic fruits , 2011 .

[31]  Murat O. Balaban,et al.  Tomato Flavor and Aroma Quality as Affected by Storage Temperature , 2000 .

[32]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Preferences in pear appearance and response to novelty among Australian and New Zealand consumers , 2006 .

[33]  E. Monteleone,et al.  Sensory profile of eight tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum) and its relationship to consumer preference , 2001 .

[34]  E. Giovannucci.  Tomato products, lycopene, and prostate cancer: a review of the epidemiological literature. , 2005, The Journal of nutrition.

[35]  E. Hallmann.  The influence of organic and conventional cultivation systems on the nutritional value and content of bioactive compounds in selected tomato types. , 2012, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.