Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of four ground filtering algorithms to generate digital terrain models (DTMs) from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. The study area is a forest environment located in Washington state, USA with distinct classes of land use and land cover (e.g., shrubland, grassland, bare soil, and three forest types according to tree density and silvicultural interventions: closed-canopy forest, intermediate-canopy forest, and open-canopy forest). The following four ground filtering algorithms were assessed: Weighted Linear Least Squares (WLS), Multi-scale Curvature Classification (MCC), Progressive Morphological Filter (PMF), and Progressive Triangulated Irregular Network (PTIN). The four algorithms performed well across the land cover, with the PMF yielding the least number of points classified as ground. Statistical differences between the pairs of DTMs were small, except for the PMF due to the highest errors. Because the forestry sector requires constant updating of topographical maps, open-source ground filtering algorithms, such as WLS and MCC, performed very well on planted forest environments. However, the performance of such filters should also be evaluated over complex native forest environments.

[1]  Txomin Hermosilla,et al.  Analysis of the Influence of Plot Size and LiDAR Density on Forest Structure Attribute Estimates , 2014 .

[2]  Xiaoye Liu,et al.  Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues , 2008 .

[3]  Andrew Thomas Hudak,et al.  A Multiscale Curvature Algorithm for Classifying Discrete Return LiDAR in Forested Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  FOREST MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING USING HIGH-RESOLUTION AIRBORNE LIDAR , 2006 .

[5]  Xianyu Yu,et al.  An Improved Morphological Algorithm for Filtering Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Based on Multi-Level Kriging Interpolation , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[6]  D. Whitman,et al.  Comparison of Three Algorithms for Filtering Airborne Lidar Data , 2005 .

[7]  Artu Ellmann,et al.  Performance analysis of freeware filtering algorithms for determining ground surface from airborne laser scanning data , 2014 .

[8]  George Vosselman,et al.  Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[9]  Hongyu Huang,et al.  A Comparison of Two Open Source LiDAR Surface Classification Algorithms , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Chengcui Zhang,et al.  A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Antonio Luis Montealegre,et al.  A Comparison of Open-Source LiDAR Filtering Algorithms in a Mediterranean Forest Environment , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[12]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[13]  Junichi Susaki,et al.  Adaptive Slope Filtering of Airborne LiDAR Data in Urban Areas for Digital Terrain Model (DTM) Generation , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Andrea Cavallaro,et al.  Sensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Halim Setan,et al.  DTM generation from LiDAR data by using different filters in open-source software , 2010 .

[16]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .