Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect

The governance of an organizational information technology (IT) infrastructure is steadily shifting away from pure hierarchical and market mechanisms toward hybrid and partnership modes that involve external vendors. In particular, IT outsourcing has recently emerged as a significant administrative innovation in an organization's IT strategy. This paper seeks to explore the sources of influence in the adoption of this innovation. For this purpose, we generated a comprehensive sample of outsourcing contracts in the US using an electronic bibliometric search process. Using diffusion modeling, our empirical analysis shows that the adoption of IT outsourcing is motivated more by internal influence (or imitative behavior) than by external influence amongst the user organizations. Subsequently, we considered the widely-publicized Eastman Kodak's outsourcing decision as a critical event to assess whether this internal influence is more pronounced in the post- Kodak regime than in the pre- Kodak regime. Our results show that internal influence is dominant in the post- Kodak regime but not in the pre- Kodak regime. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Jr. Montgomery Phister,et al.  Data processing technology and economics , 1976 .

[3]  G. Walker,et al.  A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions , 1984 .

[4]  E. Muller,et al.  Models of New Product Diffusion Through Advertising and Word-of-Mouth , 1978 .

[5]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  The adoption of corporate governance mechanisms: a test of competing diffusion models , 1994 .

[6]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[7]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Marketing and MIS During Times of Resource Scarcity , 1982, MIS Q..

[8]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[9]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[10]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[12]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[13]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[14]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[15]  Robert Kirk Mueller,et al.  Corporate Networking: Building Channels for Information and Influence , 1986 .

[16]  David Strang,et al.  Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models , 1991 .

[17]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[19]  W. Scott The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[20]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Diffusion of an Administrative Innovation , 1980 .

[21]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[22]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When giants learn to dance : mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s , 1992 .

[23]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[24]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Forward Integration into Distribution: An Empirical Test of Transaction Cost Analysis , 1988 .

[25]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Seungjin Whang,et al.  Contracting for Software Development , 1992 .

[27]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutions and the International Diffusion of Information Technology , 1990, ICIS.

[28]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Several Tests for Model Specication in the Pres-ence of Alternative Hypotheses , 1981 .

[29]  Tae Hyoung Kwon,et al.  A Diffusion of Innovation Approach to MIS Infusion: Conceptualization, Methodology, and Management Strategies , 1990, ICIS.

[30]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Incomplete contracting issues in information systems development outsourcing , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Illusive effects on the diffusion of an innovation: a comment , 1991 .

[32]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[33]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment , 1990 .

[34]  P. Keen Competing in Time: Using Telecommunications for Competitive Advantage , 1986 .

[35]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The adoption of the M-form organizational structure: a test of imitation hypothesis , 1988 .

[36]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  Diffusion in computing networks: the case of BITNET , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[37]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  O. Williamson Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[40]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[41]  Joel Dearden,et al.  The withering away of the is organization , 1990 .