Freedom to Cooperate: Gaining Clarity Into Knowledge Integration in Information Systems Development Teams

The specialized knowledge that exists among information systems development (ISD) teams must be shared and integrated to successfully develop systems solutions. Unfortunately, knowledge sharing and integration continues to be problematic. In this study, we seek out those antecedent characteristics that ISD teams should possess to facilitate the collaboration and knowledge integration necessary for enhanced performance. We propose cooperative learning theory as a lens to understand knowledge integration activities in ISD projects. We suggest that knowledge integration behaviors are discretionary, and that ISD professionals must feel autonomy in deciding to engage in them. We investigate whether the effects of autonomy on cooperative learning and of cooperative learning on work outcomes vary depending on the types of autonomy present in ISD teams. A research model is proposed, and it is empirically tested through a study of 206 ISD professionals from 38 ISD teams. Our findings suggest that autonomous teams engage more frequently in cooperative learning behaviors, and consequently perform more effectively and are more satisfied. We also find that relationships exist between the type of autonomy present in teams and the resultant elements of cooperative learning and work outcomes.

[1]  Kathryn R Wentzel,et al.  Adolescent prosocial behavior: the role of self-processes and contextual cues. , 2007, Child development.

[2]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[3]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[5]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[6]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Dynamics of Intense Work Groups: A Study of British String Quartets , 1991 .

[7]  David Wilemon,et al.  Software development and new product development: potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[8]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  An empirical study of the effect of knowledge integration on software development performance , 2004, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[9]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[11]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[12]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[13]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Systems Development Process Improvement: A Knowledge Integration Perspective , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  K. Law,et al.  Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs , 1999 .

[15]  E. A. Locke The nature and causes of job satisfaction , 1976 .

[16]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration in High‐Technology New Product Development Processes , 1998 .

[17]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[18]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[19]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  J. Edwards Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[21]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Trust and the Design of Work Complementary Constructs in Satisfaction and Performance , 2000 .

[22]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .

[23]  J. Spender Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[24]  Stephen Swailes,et al.  The dimensions of management team performance: a repertory grid study , 2004 .

[25]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[26]  Larry L. Constantine,et al.  Work organization: paradigms for project management and organization , 1993, CACM.

[27]  V. Druskat,et al.  The Content of Effective Teamwork Mental Models in Self-Managing Teams: Ownership, Learning and Heedful Interrelating , 2002 .

[28]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[29]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Managing team knowledge: core processes, tools and enabling factors , 2000 .

[30]  Mary C. Jones,et al.  IS project team performance: An empirical assessment , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[31]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less , 1996 .

[32]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Self-Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective , 1980 .

[33]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[34]  Kristi D. Willbanks,et al.  Relationship of Team Training Components to Perceptions of Team Performance , 2003 .

[35]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing , 2004 .

[36]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Process Knowledge Management in New Product Development Teams , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[37]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Effect of Prolonged Implementation of Cooperative Learning on Social Support Within the Classroom , 1985 .

[38]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[39]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Sociometric Status and Adjustment in Middle School: A Longitudinal Study , 2003 .

[40]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Brian M. Kleiner,et al.  Determinant's of Effectiveness for Cross-Functional Organizational Design Teams , 1997 .

[42]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management , 2003 .

[43]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[44]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[45]  Brian D. Janz,et al.  Self-directed teams in IS: correlates for improved systems development work outcomes , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[46]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Integrating specific knowledge: insights from the Kennedy Space Center , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[47]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Authorizing processes changing team autonomy during new product development , 1997 .

[48]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[49]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[50]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[51]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Organizational Learning Capability and Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Assessment in the Ceramic Tile Industry , 2009 .

[52]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[53]  J. Lodi The age of discontinuity - guidelines to our changing society , 1969 .

[54]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[55]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[56]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[57]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  Formal participation and performance of the system development group: the role of group heterogeneity and group-based rewards , 2000, DATB.

[58]  George B. Graen,et al.  Individual Self-Management: Analysis of Professionals' Self-Managing Activities in Functional and Cross-Functional Work Teams , 1998 .

[59]  Pattarawan Prasarnphanich,et al.  Understanding Knowledge Creation, Transfer, and Application: Investigating Cooperative, Autonomous Systems Development Teams , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[60]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Implementing Cooperative Learning. , 1992 .

[61]  Charles Glisson,et al.  Predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations. , 1988 .

[62]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[63]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Critical Skills and Knowledge Requirements of IS Professionals: A Joint Academic/Industry Investigation , 1995, MIS Q..

[65]  Dan Holtshouse Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[66]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[67]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[68]  Nicholas P. Lovrich,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Organizational Setting and Individual Coping Style on Employees Subjective Health, Job Satisfaction and Commitment , 2000 .

[69]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[70]  R. Slavin Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. , 1996 .