Visible Light and mmWave Propagation Channel Comparison for Vehicular Communications

Future connected vehicles are expected to require fast and reliable exchange of road information to increase safety and enable cooperative driving. Currently, standardized vehicular communication technologies aim to enable basic safety message exchanges with limited bandwidth. Recently, alternative technologies, based on millimeter-wave (mmWave) and visible light spectrum are proposed as complementary vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication schemes, provisioned to support future connected vehicles with high bandwidth and increased security. However, the understanding of channel propagation characteristics is the key to achieve reliability, due to higher path loss compared to 5.8 GHz band. In this work, we compare channel path loss characteristics of mmWave and vehicular visible light communication (VVLC) schemes to provide an overview regarding technology selection in an indoor parking garage. Path loss measurements are conducted with respect to various inter-vehicular distances, receiver angles, nearby vehicle existence, and lane occupation scenarios. Measurement results indicated path loss of 21.47 dB for VVLC from 3 m to 20 m distances. Moreover, path loss for mmWave 26.5 GHz and 38.5 GHz channels increased 12.5 dB, and 12.7 dB, respectively. Nearby vehicles are shown to decrease path loss of 26.5 GHz and 38.5 GHz signals up to 9.78 dB, and 9.56 dB, respectively, whereas VVLC channel path loss decreases 0.4 dB at the same scenario. Channel frequency response (CFR) measurements indicated frequency flat behavior of VVLC channels while mmWave channel exhibits frequency selectivity induced dispersion due to parking garage structure. Obstructed line-of-sight (OLoS) measurements further reveal that blocking vehicle interrupts VVLC signals while selecting a favorable antenna location leads up to 30 dB less path loss for mmWave signals.

[1]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Vehicular Communication to Support Massive Automotive Sensing , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Sinem Coleri Ergen,et al.  IEEE 802.11p and Visible Light Hybrid Communication Based Secure Autonomous Platoon , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-Wave 60 GHz Outdoor and Vehicle AOA Propagation Measurements Using a Broadband Channel Sounder , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[4]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[5]  Juyul Lee,et al.  Millimeter Wave Vehicular Blockage Characteristics Based on 28 GHz Measurements , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[6]  Masayuki Fujise,et al.  Distance dependence of path loss for millimeter wave inter-vehicle communications , 2003, 2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2003-Fall (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37484).

[7]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Indoor Office Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 28 and 73 GHz for Ultra-Dense 5G Wireless Networks , 2015, IEEE Access.

[8]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for Future Wireless Communication System Design , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  Hsin-Mu Tsai,et al.  Time variation in vehicle-to-vehicle visible light communication channels , 2016, 2016 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[10]  Sinem Coleri Ergen,et al.  Vehicular VLC Frequency Domain Channel Sounding and Characterization , 2018, 2018 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[11]  Manuel Garcia Sanchez,et al.  Millimeter wave radio channel characterization for 5G vehicle-to-vehicle communications , 2017 .

[12]  Matthew D. Higgins,et al.  Investigating the V2V Millimeter-Wave Channel Near a Vehicular Headlight in an Engine Bay , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Christian Schneider,et al.  Multi-Band Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channel Characterization in the Presence of Vehicle Blockage , 2019, IEEE Access.

[14]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  A 2-D Non-Stationary GBSM for Vehicular Visible Light Communication Channels , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Ahmed M. Al-Samman,et al.  Indoor Corridor Wideband Radio Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for 5G Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications at 19 GHz, 28 GHz, and 38 GHz Bands , 2018, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[16]  Hsin-Mu Tsai,et al.  Impact of Realistic Light Radiation Pattern on Vehicular Visible Light Communication , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.