Key research questions of global importance for cetacean conservation

Limited resources and increasing environmental concerns have prompted calls to identify the critical questions that most need to be answered to advance conservation, thereby providing an agenda for scientific research priorities. Cetaceans are often keystone indicator spe- cies but also high profile, charismatic flagship taxa that capture public and media attention as well as political interest. A dedicated workshop was held at the conference of the Society for Marine Mammalogy (December 2013, New Zealand) to identify where lack of data was hindering cetacean conservation and which questions need to be addressed most urgently. This paper sum- marizes 15 themes and component questions prioritized during the workshop. We hope this list will encourage cetacean conservation-orientated research and help agencies and policy makers to prioritize funding and future activities. This will ultimately remove some of the current obstacles to science-based cetacean conservation.

[1]  T. Caro,et al.  Top Predators as Conservation Tools: Ecological Rationale, Assumptions, and Efficacy , 2008 .

[2]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Policymakers’ and Scientists’ Ranks of Research Priorities for Resource-Management Policy , 2014 .

[3]  Andrew J Wright,et al.  Size matters: management of stress responses and chronic stress in beaked whales and other marine mammals may require larger exclusion zones. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[4]  A. Bauer,et al.  An Introduction to Marine Mammal Biology and Conservation , 2012 .

[5]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Research priorities for seabirds: improving conservation and management in the 21st century , 2012 .

[6]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[7]  Erich Hoyt,et al.  Whale watching 2001: worldwide tourism numbers, expenditures, and expanding socioeconomic benefits , 2001 .

[8]  R. Cowling,et al.  One Hundred Questions of Importance to the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  H. Whitehead,et al.  Are Cetacea ecologically important , 1988 .

[10]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK , 2006 .

[11]  S. Cooke,et al.  Is there a need for a '100 questions exercise' to enhance fisheries and aquatic conservation, policy, management and research? Lessons from a global 100 questions exercise on conservation of biodiversity. , 2010, Journal of fish biology.

[12]  M. Moore.  How we all kill whales , 2014 .

[13]  W. Bowen,et al.  Role of marine mammals in aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[14]  Mike Michael,et al.  Misunderstanding science?: Ignoring science: discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science , 1996 .

[15]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  A Collaboratively-Derived Science-Policy Research Agenda , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture , 2010 .

[17]  E. Parsons,et al.  The value of conserving whales: the impacts of cetacean‐related tourism on the economy of rural West Scotland , 2003 .

[18]  E. Hoyt.  Marine protected areas for whales, dolphins and porpoises , 2011 .

[19]  Sue E. Moore,et al.  Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinels , 2008 .

[20]  M. Bruford,et al.  Conservation Options for the Baiji: Time for Realism? , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Seventy-One Important Questions for the Conservation of Marine Biodiversity , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  D. Dudgeon.  Last chance to see …: ex situ conservation and the fate of the baiji , 2005 .

[23]  Murray A. Rudd,et al.  Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy , 2011 .

[24]  Daniela Liggett,et al.  Polar research: Six priorities for Antarctic science , 2014, Nature.

[25]  Matthew H. Godfrey,et al.  Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  M. Rudd,et al.  How Research‐Prioritization Exercises Affect Conservation Policy , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  W. J. Nichols,et al.  Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century , 2010 .

[28]  John C. Cannon,et al.  Pacific Ocean–Wide Profile of CYP1A1 Expression, Stable Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Ratios, and Organic Contaminant Burden in Sperm Whale Skin Biopsies , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The big ecological questions inhibiting effective environmental management in Australia , 2009 .

[30]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The 50 Most Important Questions Relating to the Maintenance and Restoration of an Ecological Continuum in the European Alps , 2013, PloS one.

[31]  M. Rudd,et al.  Scientists’ prioritization of global coastal research questions , 2013 .

[32]  John A. Hall,et al.  Top 40 Priorities for Science to Inform US Conservation and Management Policy , 2011 .