Functional importance of RNA interactions in selection of translation initiation codons

RNA base pairing between the initiation codon and anticodon loop of initiator tRNA is essential but not sufficient for the selection of the ‘correct’ mRNA translational start site by ribosomes. In prokaryotes, additional RNA interactions between small ribosomal subunit RNA and mRNA sequences just upstream of the start codon can efficiently direct the ribosome to the initiation site. Although there is presently no proof for a similar important ribosomal RNA interaction in eukaryotes, the 5′ non‐coding regions of their mRNAs and ‘consensus sequences’ surrounding initiation codons have been shown to be strong determinants for initiation‐site selection, but the exact mechanisms are not yet understood. Intramolecular base pairing in mRNA and participation of translation initiation factors can strongly influence the formation of mRNA–small ribosomal subunit–initiator tRNA complexes and modulate translational activities in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Only recently has it been appreciated that alternative mechanisms may also contribute to the selection of initiation codons in all organisms. Although direct proof is currently lacking, there is accumulating evidence that additional cis‐acting mRNA elements and trans‐acting proteins may form specific ‘bridging’ interactions with ribosomes during translation initiation.

[1]  G. Janssen,et al.  Translation of vph mRNA in Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli after removal of the 5′ untranslated leader , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  P. Hu,et al.  A novel translation initiation region from Mycoplasma genitalium that functions in Escherichia coli. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  S. Stern,et al.  Interactions of a small RNA with antibiotic and RNA ligands of the 30S subunit , 1994, Nature.

[4]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: old and new questions , 1990, Molecular microbiology.

[5]  L. Isaksson,et al.  Codon choice and potential complementarity between mRNA downstream of the initiation codon and bases 1471-1480 in 16S ribosomal RNA affects expression of glnS. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  K. Nakahigashi,et al.  Isolation and sequence analysis of rpoH genes encoding sigma 32 homologs from gram negative bacteria: conserved mRNA and protein segments for heat shock regulation. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  M. Santer,et al.  A single base change in the Shine-Dalgarno region of 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli affects translation of many proteins. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Multiple control of Escherichia coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase expression involves a transcriptional repressor and a translational enhancer element. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  V. M. Pain,et al.  The C‐terminal domain of eukaryotic protein synthesis initiation factor (eIF) 4G is sufficient to support cap‐independent translation in the absence of eIF4E. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[10]  U. Bläsi,et al.  Ternary complex formation on leaderless phage mRNA. , 1995, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[11]  E. Snyder,et al.  High-affinity RNA ligands to Escherichia coli ribosomes and ribosomal protein S1: comparison of natural and unnatural binding sites. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[12]  J. van Duin,et al.  Translational initiation on structured messengers. Another role for the Shine-Dalgarno interaction. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  M. Bibb,et al.  The mRNA for the 23S rRNA methylase encoded by the ermE gene of Saccharopolyspora erythraea is translated in the absence of a conventional ribosome‐binding site , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  U. RajBhandary,et al.  Ribosome‐initiator tRNA complex as an intermediate in translation initiation in Escherichia coli revealed by use of mutant initiator tRNAs and specialized ribosomes. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[15]  J. Puglisi,et al.  Structure of the A Site of Escherichia coli 16S Ribosomal RNA Complexed with an Aminoglycoside Antibiotic , 1996, Science.

[16]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  General RNA binding proteins render translation cap dependent. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[17]  R. Brimacombe,et al.  From stand-by to decoding site. Adjustment of the mRNA on the 30S ribosomal subunit under the influence of the initiation factors. , 1995, RNA.

[18]  L. Shapiro,et al.  A developmentally regulated chromosomal origin of replication uses essential transcription elements. , 1995, Genes & development.

[19]  H. Noller,et al.  Specific protection of 16 S rRNA by translational initiation factors. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R. Jackson,et al.  The immediate downstream codon strongly influences the efficiency of utilization of eukaryotic translation initiation codons. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[21]  G. Stormo,et al.  Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: sequences within the ribosome‐binding site , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[22]  A. Prats,et al.  Translation of CUG- but not AUG-initiated forms of human fibroblast growth factor 2 is activated in transformed and stressed cells , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  M. L. Sprengart,et al.  The downstream box: an efficient and independent translation initiation signal in Escherichia coli. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[24]  R. Simons,et al.  Escherichia coli translation initiation factor 3 discriminates the initiation codon in vivo , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  M. L. Sprengart,et al.  The initiation of translation in E. coli: apparent base pairing between the 16srRNA and downstream sequences of the mRNA. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  M. Inouye,et al.  Cold shock induces a major ribosomal-associated protein that unwinds double-stranded RNA in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Brimacombe,et al.  Prokaryotic translation: the interactive pathway leading to initiation. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  H. D. de Boer,et al.  Specialized ribosome system: preferential translation of a single mRNA species by a subpopulation of mutated ribosomes in Escherichia coli. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  RNA-protein interactions in regulation of picornavirus RNA translation. , 1996, Microbiological reviews.

[30]  M. Kozak.  Determinants of translational fidelity and efficiency in vertebrate mRNAs , 1994, Biochimie.

[31]  P. Sarnow,et al.  Internal initiation of translation mediated by the 5′ leader of a cellular mRNA , 1991, Nature.

[32]  J. G. Patton,et al.  Direct evidence that polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) is essential for internal initiation of translation of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA. , 1995, RNA.

[33]  J. Hershey,et al.  SUI1/p16 is required for the activity of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  R. Brimacombe,et al.  The structure of ribosomal RNA: a three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[35]  R. Gutell,et al.  Collection of small subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1994. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  P Sarnow,et al.  Evidence for involvement of trans-acting factors in selection of the AUG start codon during eukaryotic translational initiation , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[37]  R. Jackson,et al.  Unique features of internal initiation of hepatitis C virus RNA translation. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[38]  K. Heumann,et al.  Complete nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome X. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[39]  M. Springer,et al.  The role of the AUU initiation codon in the negative feedback regulation of the gene for translation initiation factor IF3 in Escherichia coli , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[40]  N. Delihas,et al.  Secondary structures of Escherichia coli antisense micF RNA, the 5'-end of the target ompF mRNA, and the RNA/RNA duplex. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[41]  U. Bläsi,et al.  Downstream box‐anti‐downstream box interactions are dispensable for translation initiation of leaderless mRNAs. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[42]  I. Ivanov,et al.  A second putative mRNA binding site on the Escherichia coli ribosome. , 1995, Gene.

[43]  N. V. Tzareva,et al.  Ribosome‐messenger recognition in the absence of the Shine‐Dalgarno interactions , 1994, FEBS letters.

[44]  J P Reboud,et al.  [Initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells]. , 1969, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des seances de l'Academie des sciences. Serie D: Sciences naturelles.

[45]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Phosphorylation of initiation factor 2α by protein kinase GCN2 mediates gene-specific translational control of GCN4 in yeast , 1992, Cell.

[46]  V. Agol,et al.  Prokaryotic-like cis elements in the cap-independent internal initiation of translation on picornavirus RNA , 1992, Cell.

[47]  F. Studier,et al.  Consecutive low-usage leucine codons block translation only when near the 5' end of a message in Escherichia coli. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  R. Hengge-aronis,et al.  The RNA-binding protein HF-I, known as a host factor for phage Qbeta RNA replication, is essential for rpoS translation in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Genes & development.

[49]  H. O. Voorma.  26 Control of Translation Initiation in Prokaryotes , 1996 .

[50]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.