The value of ultrasound elastography in differential diagnosis of superficial lymph nodes

The study evaluated the value of ultrasound elastography in differentiating the benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes. A total of 112 subjects, including 82 patients with enlarged lymph nodes and 30 healthy volunteers, were recruited. All the subjects were examined by B-mode ultrasonography, power Doppler ultrasonography and elastography. Most of the patients were histopathologically confirmed by needle aspiration cytology and some patients were diagnosed by clinical data combined with follow-up findings. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of B-mode ultrasonography were 59.8%, 76.5% and 67.1%, those of the blood flow classification by power Doppler ultrasonography 77.0%, 82.3% and 79.4% and those of elastographic classification 74.7%, 97.1% and 84.5%, respectively. The elasticity of the lymph nodes was quantitatively measured and defined as stiffness value. When the stiffness value of 2.395 was taken as the cutoff point, the sensitivity and specificity of elastography were 78.41% and 98.51%, and the Youden index reached the highest, with the value being 0.7692. The stiffness values of two indeterminate benign lymph nodes, the elastrographic findings of which were rated as patterns 2 and 3, were below the cutoff point. The elastographic findings of 10 malignant lymph nodes were also classified as pattern 2 or 3. Only one of them had the stiffness values below the cutoff point. It was concluded that ultrasound elastography is a novel, noninvasive and convenient tool for the differentiation of the nature of the superficial lymph nodes in clinical practice.

[1]  Carlos Cuevas,et al.  Ultrasound‐Based Elastography: A Novel Approach to Assess Radio Frequency Ablation of Liver Masses Performed With Expandable Ablation Probes , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  Sonographic Elastography Combined With Conventional Sonography , 2009, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  Jonathan Ophir,et al.  Breast tumor classification using axial shear strain elastography: a feasibility study , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Hui Zhi,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography, Mammography, and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Solid Breast Lesions , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  B. Barreau,et al.  Élastosonographie du sein : étude prospective de 122 lésions , 2007 .

[6]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[7]  J. Ahmed,et al.  Paraphimosis leading to Fournier's Gangrene. , 2009, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[8]  T. Miyagawa,et al.  Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images. , 2009, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Ultrasonography of Abnormal Neck Lymph Nodes , 2007, Ultrasound quarterly.

[10]  T. Schlomm,et al.  Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.

[11]  P. Gobbi,et al.  Diagnostic approach to lymph node enlargement. , 1999, Haematologica.

[12]  Y. Mizutani,et al.  The utility of transrectal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with US elastography using carotid artery pulsation. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  Y. Hirooka,et al.  Feasibility of Tissue Elastography Using Transcutaneous Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Diseases , 2009, Pancreas.

[15]  Katsuhide Ito,et al.  Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  T. Fischer,et al.  Real-time sonoelastography performed in addition to B-mode ultrasound and mammography: improved differentiation of breast lesions? , 2006, Academic radiology.

[17]  D. Adler,et al.  Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Does anybody know how we should measure Doppler parameters in lymph nodes? , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[19]  Hui Zhi,et al.  Semi-quantitating stiffness of breast solid lesions in ultrasonic elastography. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[20]  R. Bhowate,et al.  Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[21]  J. Chang,et al.  Patients with Breast Cancer: Differences in Color Doppler Flow and Gray-Scale US Features of Benign and Malignant Axillary Lymph Nodes , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  R. Emshoff,et al.  The diagnostic value of ultrasonography to detect occult lymph node involvement at different levels in patients with squamous cell carcinoma in the maxillofacial region. , 2003, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[23]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.