Engaging Teachers (and Students) With Media Streaming Technology: The Case of Box of Broadcasts

Information and Communication Technology offers powerful Web 2.0 tools that can benefit learners with different learning preferences. The rise of video streaming, the increased proliferation of ‘on demand’ televisual media and new smartphone streaming opportunities have generated a range of web-based media that may usefully support teachers and learners in accommodating these varied learning styles. At the same time, media streaming technologies such as YouTube have distinct drawbacks for students, teachers and their institutions, particularly in relation to appropriate content and the ethical issues around the uploading of student materials to a public repository. Two studies are reported. In Study 1, two case studies of how teachers engaged students with a media-streaming system called Box of Broadcasts (BoB) are discussed using principles of design-based research. The result from the first case study indicated that BoB provided an improved efficiency for teachers who filmed students’ presentations in a second language. The second case study illustrated how the integration of BoB into their classroom teaching led a psychology teacher to think differently about students and the design and delivery of teaching and learning resources. In Study 2, the use of a qualitative semi-structured interview approach with eight teachers indicated that staff felt that BoB was beneficial in supporting pedagogic practice. Furthermore, staff highlighted the opportunities for dialogue about theory, reality and practice that video materials offered to students as added value. Key limitations for some staff in their use of BoB as a support for video-enriched pedagogic practice were the restricted level of available content on BoB, some difficulties relating to the skills required for creating and using clips and technical stability when using clips.

[1]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Why Increased Social Presence through Web Videoconferencing Does Not Automatically Lead to Improved Learning , 2014 .

[2]  Linda Blake,et al.  The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  How achievement emotions impact students' decisions for online learning, and what precedes those emotions , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Paul White,et al.  Video Streaming: a guide for educational development , 2002 .

[5]  Andrea Dlaska,et al.  Self-Assessment of Pronunciation. , 2008 .

[6]  B. Rienties,et al.  Changing Teacher Beliefs Through ICT: Comparing a Blended and Online Teacher Training Program , 2011 .

[7]  Simon Lygo-Baker,et al.  Universities as centres of non-learning , 2008 .

[8]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[9]  Peter Duffy,et al.  Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. , 2008 .

[10]  Matthew J. Koehler What happens when teachers design educational technology , 2005 .

[11]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Thérèse Laferrière,et al.  Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[13]  Jocasta Williams,et al.  'Perpetual Connectivity': Lecture Recordings and Portable Media Players , 2007 .

[14]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[15]  Donna Harp Ziegenfuss,et al.  Collaborative course design: changing the process, acknowledging the context, and implications for academic development , 2008 .

[16]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of a Teaching Evaluation Form Using a Mixed-Methods Analysis , 2007 .

[17]  K. Bloom,et al.  Digging into YouTube Videos: Using Media Literacy and Participatory Culture to Promote Cross-Cultural Understanding , 2010, Journal of Media Literacy Education.

[18]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  Avoiding technology-enhanced non-learning , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  P. Blackmore,et al.  Handbook of College and University Teaching: A Global Perspective , 2012 .

[21]  Robert K. Branson,et al.  Instructional development , 1978 .

[22]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Explaining students' appraisal of lectures and student-activating teaching: perceived context and student characteristics , 2012, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[23]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[24]  V. Komis,et al.  Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation programme , 2007 .

[25]  Bolanle A. Olaniran Applying Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication into Course Design: Some Considerations and Practical Guides. , 2006 .

[26]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[27]  Bart Rienties,et al.  Integrating ICT in Business Education: Using TPACK to Reflect on Two Course Redesigns , 2012 .

[28]  David Gijbels,et al.  Instructional development for teachers in higher education: effects on students' learning outcomes , 2012 .

[29]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[30]  Ian M. Kinchin Visualizing knowledge stuctures of university teaching to relate pedagogic theory and academic practice. , 2011 .

[31]  R. Luppicini Review of computer mediated communication research for education , 2007 .

[32]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  A review of the role of information communication technology and course design in transitional education practices , 2012, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[33]  Troy Jones,et al.  YouTube: Educational Potentials and Pitfalls , 2011 .

[34]  Panagiotes S. Anastasiades,et al.  Interactive Videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education , 2005, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[36]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers , 2007 .