Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards

Solar geoengineering (SG) has the potential to restore average surface temperatures by increasing planetary albedo1–4, but this could reduce precipitation5–7. Thus, although SG might reduce globally aggregated risks, it may increase climate risks for some regions8–10. Here, using the high-resolution forecast-oriented low ocean resolution (HiFLOR) model—which resolves tropical cyclones and has an improved representation of present-day precipitation extremes11,12—alongside 12 models from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), we analyse the fraction of locations that see their local climate change exacerbated or moderated by SG. Rather than restoring temperatures, we assume that SG is applied to halve the warming produced by doubling CO2 (half-SG). In HiFLOR, half-SG offsets most of the CO2-induced increase of simulated tropical cyclone intensity. Moreover, neither temperature, water availability, extreme temperature nor extreme precipitation are exacerbated under half-SG when averaged over any Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Extremes (SREX) region. Indeed, for both extreme precipitation and water availability, less than 0.4% of the ice-free land surface sees exacerbation. Thus, while concerns about the inequality of solar geoengineering impacts are appropriate, the quantitative extent of inequality may be overstated13.High-resolution coupled climate model simulations suggest only 0.4% of the land surface will see exacerbated hydrological risks under solar geoengineering that halves warming, indicating that geoengineering-related risks may be overstated.

[1]  L. Eberhardt Restoring the Quality of Our Environment , 1967 .

[2]  David W. Keith,et al.  a serious look at geoengineering , 1992 .

[3]  E. Teller,et al.  Global warming and ice ages: I. prospects for physics based modulation of global change , 1996 .

[4]  Philip W. Jones First- and Second-Order Conservative Remapping Schemes for Grids in Spherical Coordinates , 1999 .

[5]  Neville Nicholls,et al.  Clivar/GCOS/WMO Workshop on Indices and Indicators for Climate Extremes Workshop Summary , 1999 .

[6]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[7]  Kerry A. Emanuel,et al.  A simple model of multiple climate regimes , 2002 .

[8]  K. Emanuel Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years , 2005, Nature.

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part I: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics , 2006 .

[10]  Sai Ravela,et al.  A STATISTICAL DETERMINISTIC APPROACH TO HURRICANE RISK ASSESSMENT , 2006 .

[11]  B. Samuels,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part II: The Baseline Ocean Simulation , 2006 .

[12]  Andrew T. Wittenberg,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part III: Tropical Pacific Climate and ENSO , 2006 .

[13]  Shian-Jiann Lin,et al.  Finite-volume transport on various cubed-sphere grids , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[15]  Paul J. Valdes,et al.  “Sunshade World”: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering , 2008 .

[16]  Kerry A. Emanuel,et al.  Hurricanes and Global Warming: Results from Downscaling IPCC AR4 Simulations , 2008 .

[17]  Andy Ridgwell,et al.  Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts , 2010 .

[18]  G. Holland,et al.  Tropical cyclones and climate change , 2010, Tropical Cyclone Research and Review.

[19]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .

[20]  W. McGuire Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters , 2011 .

[21]  A simple model to account for regional inequalities in the effectiveness of solar radiation management , 2012, Climatic Change.

[22]  Ryan L. Sriver,et al.  Tension between reducing sea-level rise and global warming through solar-radiation management , 2012 .

[23]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[24]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. , 2012 .

[25]  G. Vecchi,et al.  Simulated Climate and Climate Change in the GFDL CM2.5 High-Resolution Coupled Climate Model , 2012 .

[26]  P. Rasch,et al.  Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[27]  K. Emanuel Downscaling CMIP5 climate models shows increased tropical cyclone activity over the 21st century , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Ben Kravitz,et al.  A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment , 2013 .

[29]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[30]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research , 2013 .

[31]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation , 2013 .

[32]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  Key factors governing uncertainty in the response to sunshade geoengineering from a comparison of the GeoMIP ensemble and a perturbed parameter ensemble , 2014 .

[33]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  L. Russell Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, A Report from the National Research Council , 2014 .

[35]  G. Vecchi,et al.  On the Seasonal Forecasting of Regional Tropical Cyclone Activity , 2014 .

[36]  Reto Knutti,et al.  The asymmetry of the climate system's response to solar forcing changes and its implications for geoengineering scenarios , 2014 .

[37]  Shian-Jiann Lin,et al.  Simulation and Prediction of Category 4 and 5 Hurricanes in the High-Resolution GFDL HiFLOR Coupled Climate Model , 2015 .

[38]  P. Forster,et al.  A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes , 2015 .

[39]  Venkatramani Balaji,et al.  Improved Seasonal Prediction of Temperature and Precipitation over Land in a High-Resolution GFDL Climate Model , 2015 .

[40]  P. Irvine,et al.  An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering , 2016 .

[41]  J. Randerson,et al.  Plant responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  G. Vecchi,et al.  The Resolution Dependence of Contiguous U.S. Precipitation Extremes in Response to CO2 Forcing , 2016 .

[43]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  G. Vecchi,et al.  Improved Simulation of Tropical Cyclone Responses to ENSO in the Western North Pacific in the High-Resolution GFDL HiFLOR Coupled Climate Model* , 2016 .

[45]  G. Vecchi,et al.  Seasonal Forecasts of Major Hurricanes and Landfalling Tropical Cyclones using a High-Resolution GFDL Coupled Climate Model , 2016 .

[46]  Douglas G. MacMartin,et al.  First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives , 2017 .

[47]  K. Emanuel,et al.  Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency , 2017, Nature Communications.

[48]  Friederike E. L. Otto,et al.  Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017 , 2017 .

[49]  David William Keith,et al.  Brief communication: Understanding solar geoengineering's potential to limit sea level rise requires attention from cryosphere experts , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[50]  David William Keith,et al.  Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[51]  Duoying Ji,et al.  A statistical examination of the effects of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropical storm genesis , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[52]  J. Moore,et al.  Regional Climate Impacts of Stabilizing Global Warming at 1.5 K Using Solar Geoengineering , 2018 .

[53]  David W. Keith,et al.  Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering , 2018 .

[54]  Kieran T. Bhatia,et al.  Projected Response of Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Intensification in a Global Climate Model , 2018, Journal of Climate.

[55]  G. Fitzgerald,et al.  'I. , 2019, Australian journal of primary health.

[56]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .