Criteria for Quality and Safety while Performing Unobtrusive Domestic Mobility Assessments Using Mobile Service Robots

A new concept for safely performing and qualitatively evaluating assessments in domestic unsupervised environments, especially when utilizing mobile service robots, is presented. The presented approach is based on the idea that classical geriatric assessments, especially from the domain of mobility, may be divided in components which happen naturally throughout the day in domestic environments. Those components are measured separately and are recombined to com-plete assessment tests later on. In order for physicians to decide how reliable assessment results from the domestic do-main are, we define technical quality criteria for the components of the Timed Up&Go assessment test. The approach is evaluated within an experiment in a living lab utilizing sensors, especially a laser range scanner, equipped with a mobile robot. Results show that the presented approach may be used to separate sensor measurements promising good assess-ment results from those containing insufficient data. Additionally, using mobile robots to perform assessments in domestic environments holds the potential danger for the inhabitant to stumble over the robot. Therefore, the paper also evaluates the aspect of inhabitants’ safety during domestic assessments based on the experiment’s data. A novel approach to navigate safely using the previously presented approach of optimal observation lots (OOL) is presented.

[1]  Andre Gustavo Adami,et al.  Unobtrusive Assessment of Mobility , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Thomas Frenken,et al.  aTUG: Fully-automated timed up and go assessment using ambient sensor technologies , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[4]  Thomas Frenken,et al.  Technical Approaches to Unobtrusive Geriatric Assessments in Domestic Environments , 2010 .

[5]  Thomas Frenken,et al.  A mobile robot for self-selected gait velocity assessments in assistive environments: a robotic driven approach to bring assistive technologies into established homes , 2010, PETRA '10.

[6]  K. Cameron,et al.  Reducing fall incidence in community elders by telecare using predictive systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[7]  C. N. Scanaill,et al.  A Review of Approaches to Mobility Telemonitoring of the Elderly in Their Living Environment , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  C. Breazeal Sociable Machines: Expressive Social Ex-change Between Humans and Robots , 2000 .

[9]  Mark S. Nixon,et al.  A floor sensor system for gait recognition , 2005, Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies (AutoID'05).

[10]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Distributed Healthcare: Simultaneous Assessment of Multiple Individuals , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[11]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Thomas Frenken,et al.  Precise assessment of self-selected gait velocity in domestic environments , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[14]  Thomas Frenken,et al.  Enhancing Mobile Robots’ Navigation through Mobility Assessments in Domestic Environments , 2011 .

[15]  M. Beers,et al.  The Merck Manual of Geriatrics , 1995 .

[16]  Andrew Y. Ng,et al.  Probabilistic Mobile Manipulation in Dynamic Environments, with Application to Opening Doors , 2007, IJCAI.

[17]  M. Montero‐Odasso,et al.  Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[18]  Axel Helmer,et al.  3DLC: A Comprehensive Model for Personal Health Records Supporting New Types of Medical Applications , 2011 .

[19]  J C Wall,et al.  The Timed Get-up-and-Go test revisited: measurement of the component tasks. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Marcel Tresanchez,et al.  Measuring Gait Using a Ground Laser Range Sensor , 2009, Sensors.

[21]  Jasmine C Menant,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Age and Gender Differences in Seven Tests of Functional Mobility , 2022 .