Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems

Two experiments examined retrieval processes in transactive memory systems (D. M. Wegner, 1987). In Experiment 1, intimate couples who worked face to face performed better on a knowledge-pooling task than strangers who worked face to face and better than intimate couples who worked via a computer conferencing system. Additional analyses indicated that intimate couples when interacting face to face were better able to determine which partner was correct on questions that only 1 member knew the answer to prior to discussion. In Experiment 2, intimate couples scored significantly better on the knowledge task when they had access to either nonverbal or paralinguistic communication cues than when they had access to neither. Taken together, the results indicate that both nonverbal and paralinguistic communication play an important role in the retrieval of knowledge in transactive memory systems.

[1]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[2]  Z. Rubin Measurement of romantic love. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  Visual Behavior in Social Interaction , 1972 .

[4]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[5]  Arthur N. Wiens,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The State of the Art , 1978 .

[6]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[7]  Steven H. Lewis,et al.  Listener Responsiveness and the Coordination of Conversation , 1982 .

[8]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[9]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word , 1986 .

[10]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[11]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[12]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals , 1989 .

[13]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Constructing shared communicative environments , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[14]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[15]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[16]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[17]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[18]  J. McGrath Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.

[19]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[20]  D. Wegner A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[21]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  A Theory of Collective Induction , 1995 .

[22]  A. Hollingshead The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[23]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[24]  A. Hollingshead Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[25]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.