Pumpkin balloon designs such as the constant-bulge-angle design, the constant-bulge-radius design, and hybrids of the constant-bulge-angle and constant-bulge-radius schemes have been used in an attempt to achieve a cyclically symmetric pumpkinlike shape when fully inflated. A number of flight balloons that were built based on the constant-bulge-angle, constant-bulge-radius, and hybrid design strategies encountered deployment problems. In June 2006, Flight 555-NT (a hybrid design) formed an S-cleft and did not deploy. Currently, NASA's approach to superpressure balloon design uses a constant-stress model developed at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. To fully understand the mechanism behind cleft formation in pumpkin balloons and to explore the constant-stress design space, NASA's Balloon Program Office carried out a series of inflation tests in 2007 involving four 27-meter-diameter 200-gore pumpkin balloons. One of the test vehicles was a one-third-scale mockup of the Flight 555-NT balloon. Using an inflation procedure intended to mimic ascent, the one-third-scale mockup developed an S-cleft feature that was strikingly similar to the one observed in Flight 555-NT. The remaining three 27-meter balloons tested were constant-stress designs and deployed properly. In an effort to gauge constant-stress design susceptibility to deployment problems, we carry out a number of parametric studies and assess the stability landscape of the constant-stress design space. In our studies, we examine two types of top end-fitting boundary conditions, one restrictive and one less restrictive, that help to define a cleft-free design envelope. We correlate our analytical predictions with outcomes of inflation tests involving 27-meter-diameter test vehicles and outcomes from flight 586-NT and flight 591-NT, which involved larger constant-stress designs. To study scaling effects, we consider a 14-million-cubic-foot design. Our analysis suggests that as one scales up the balloon, the size of the cleft-free envelope shrinks.
[1]
Meyer Nahon,et al.
Analysis and Design of Robust Helium Aerostats
,
2007
.
[2]
Kenneth A. Brakke,et al.
The Surface Evolver
,
1992,
Exp. Math..
[3]
Michael C. Barg,et al.
Existence Theorems For Tendon-Reinforced Thin Wrinkled Membranes Subjected to a Hydrostatic Pressure Load
,
2008
.
[4]
The nylon scintillator containment vessels for the Borexino solar neutrino experiment
,
2007,
physics/0702162.
[5]
J. Nott.
Design considerations and practical results with long duration systems for manned world flights
,
2004
.
[6]
Frank Baginski,et al.
Simulating clefts in pumpkin balloons
,
2010
.
[7]
C. R. Calladine,et al.
Stability of the ‘Endeavour’ Balloon
,
1988
.
[8]
Frank Baginski,et al.
Cleft formation in pumpkin balloons
,
2006
.
[9]
K. Brakke,et al.
Unstable, Cyclically Symmetric and Stable, Asymmetric Pumpkin-Balloon Configurations
,
2007
.
[10]
A. Pipkin.
Relaxed energy densities for large deformations of membranes
,
1993
.
[11]
Frank Baginski,et al.
Stability of Cyclically Symmetric Strained Pumpkin Balloons and the Formation of Undesired Equilibria
,
2006
.
[12]
K. Brakke,et al.
Estimating the Deployment Pressure in Pumpkin Balloons
,
2011
.
[13]
Sergio Pellegrino,et al.
Buckling pressure of “pumpkin” balloons
,
2007
.
[14]
Christopher Jenkins,et al.
Deployment Destiny, Stable Equilibria, and the Implications for Gossamer Design
,
2002
.