Antimicrobial activity and skin permeation of iodine present in an iodine-impregnated surgical incise drape.

OBJECTIVES The antimicrobial efficacy of an iodine-impregnated incise drape against MRSA was evaluated in a skin model. The permeation of iodine from this drape into the skin was also assessed. METHODS The antimicrobial efficacy was evaluated in ex vivo studies following application of the surgical incise drape for various times on the surface of donor skin, which was inoculated with either 1 × 10(3) or 1 × 10(6) cfu MRSA/cm(2) skin and mounted on Franz diffusion cells. In some experiments the MRSA-inoculated skin was pre-incubated for 18 h at room temperature prior to applying the drape. Permeation of iodine into the skin using this model was also determined following application of the incise drape for 6 h. RESULTS The iodine-impregnated drape demonstrated antimicrobial activity compared with the non-use of drape. This reached significance when a high inoculum of MRSA was applied with no pre-incubation period and when a low inoculum of MRSA was applied with a pre-incubation period (P = 0.002 and P = 0.014, respectively). Furthermore, in experiments wherein a high inoculum of MRSA was applied with no pre-incubation period, the iodine-impregnated drape demonstrated superior antimicrobial activity compared with the use of a non-antimicrobial drape (P < 0.001). MIC and MBC values of iodine were attained to 1500 μm below the skin surface. CONCLUSIONS The iodine-impregnated surgical incise drape had detectable antimicrobial activity. Furthermore, iodine penetrated into the deeper layers of the skin. This property should suppress microbial regrowth at and around a surgical incision site, making its use preferable to the use of a standard drape or non-use of a drape.

[1]  B. Söderquist,et al.  Bacterial recolonization of the skin and wound contamination during cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial of the use of plastic adhesive drape compared with bare skin. , 2013, The Journal of hospital infection.

[2]  B. Conway,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of a chlorhexidine intravascular catheter site gel dressing. , 2011, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[3]  B. Conway,et al.  Permeation of Chlorhexidine from Alcoholic and Aqueous Solutions within Excised Human Skin , 2009, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  B. Conway,et al.  Penetration of Chlorhexidine into Human Skin , 2008, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  A Charlett,et al.  Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. , 2005, The Journal of hospital infection.

[6]  J. Andrews,et al.  Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[7]  J. Fairclough,et al.  Rate of bacterial recolonization of the skin after preparation: Four methods compared , 1987, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  W. Altemeier,et al.  Surgical considerations of endogenous infections--sources, types, and methods of control. , 1968, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[9]  J. Webster,et al.  Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  S. Ash,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of efficacy of citrate/methylene blue/parabens/IPA solution as a skin disinfectant. , 2010, The Journal of infection.