Which Spectral Acceleration are you Using?

Analysis of the seismic risk to a structure requires assessment of both the rate of occurrence of future earthquake ground motions (hazard) and the effect of these ground motions on the structure (response). These two pieces are often linked using an intensity measure such as spectral acceleration. However, earth scientists typically use the geometric mean of the spectral accelerations of the two horizontal components of ground motion as the intensity measure for hazard analysis, while structural engineers often use spectral acceleration of a single horizontal component as the intensity measure for response analysis. This inconsistency in definitions is typically not recognized when the two assessments are combined, resulting in unconservative conclusions about the seismic risk to the structure. The source and impact of the problem is examined in this paper, and several potential resolutions are proposed. This discussion is directly applicable to probabilistic analyses, but also has implications for deterministic seismic evaluations.

[1]  David M. Boore,et al.  SEA99: A Revised Ground-Motion Prediction Relation for Use in Extensional Tectonic Regimes , 2005 .

[2]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering , 2004 .

[3]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  CHOICE OF A VECTOR OF GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES FOR SEISMIC DEMAND HAZARD ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[4]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments , 2003 .

[5]  Pacific Earthquake A Technical Framework for Probability-Based Demand and Capacity Factor Design (DCFD) Seismic Formats , 2003 .

[6]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Uncertainty Specification and Propagation for Loss Estimation Using FOSM Methods , 2003 .

[7]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design , 2002 .

[8]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[9]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR STEEL MOMENT FRAMES , 2002 .

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[11]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Net Section Efficiency of Steel Coupons with Power Actuated Fasteners , 2002 .

[12]  S. Harmsen,et al.  Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps , 2002 .

[13]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Vector-valued Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2001 .

[14]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  State of the Practice of Seismic Hazard Evaluation , 2000 .

[15]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2000 .

[16]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures , 1999 .

[17]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Three Proposals for Characterizing MDOF Nonlinear Seismic Response , 1998 .

[18]  John G. Anderson Benefits of scenario ground motion maps , 1997 .

[19]  A. M. Chandler,et al.  Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering , 1997 .

[20]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work , 1997 .

[21]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[22]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[23]  R. Youngs,et al.  Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data , 1997 .

[24]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[25]  L. Reiter Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[26]  N. Abrahamson Statistical properties of peak ground accelerations recorded by the SMART 1 array , 1988 .