Politics and Life Chances in a State Socialist Regime: Dual Career Paths into the Urban Chinese Elite, 1949 to 1996

Recent research on career mobility under communism suggests that party membership and education may have had different effects in administrative and professional careers. Using life history data from a nationally representative 1996 survey of urban Chinese adults, we subject this finding to more stringent tests and find even stronger contrasts between career paths. Only recently has college education improved a high school graduate's odds of becoming an elite administrator, while it has always been a virtual prerequisite for a professional position. On the other hand, party membership, always a prerequisite for top administrative posts, has never improved the odds of becoming an elite professional. We also find that professionals rarely become administrators, and vice versa. Differences between career paths have evolved over the decades, but they remain sharp. Thus, China has a hybrid mobility regime in which the loyalty principles of a political machine are combined with, and segregated from, the meritocratic standards of modern professions. Recent changes may reflect a return to generic state socialist practices rejected in the Mao years rather than the influence of an emerging market economy

[1]  J. M. Ridge,et al.  Class Origin, Class Destination, and Education: A Cross-National Study of Ten Industrial Nations , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Victor Nee,et al.  A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism , 1989 .

[3]  T. Gold,et al.  Education under Mao: Class and Competition in Canton Schools, 1960-1980. , 1985 .

[4]  L. Trotsky Revolution Betrayed? , 1937 .

[5]  I. Szelenyi Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism , 1983 .

[6]  D. Treiman,et al.  Intergenerational class mobility in comparative perspective , 1989 .

[7]  John R. Logan,et al.  Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China , 1996 .

[8]  D. McCoy The Radicalism of the American Revolution. , 1993 .

[9]  James C. Macclelland,et al.  Cultural Revolution in Russia, 1928-1931 , 1979 .

[10]  P. Moen,et al.  Stratification Dynamics under State Socialism: The Case of Urban China, 1949–1993 , 1996 .

[11]  R. Royall Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators , 1986 .

[12]  Social Inequality and Social Mobility , 1986 .

[13]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies , 1993 .

[14]  Y. Shavit,et al.  From school to work: a comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations , 1999 .

[15]  D. Treiman Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective , 1977 .

[16]  Susan L. Shirk Competitive Comrades: Career Incentives and Student Strategies in China , 1981 .

[17]  A. Inkeles Social Stratification and Mobility in the Soviet Union: 1940-1950 , 1950 .

[18]  Hans-Peter Blossfeld,et al.  Techniques of event history modeling : new approaches to causal analysis , 2001 .

[19]  D. Krymkowski The Process of Status Attainment Among Men in Poland, The U.S., and West Germany , 1991 .

[20]  B. Denitch The Legitimation of a Revolution: The Yugoslav Case , 1978 .

[21]  K. Polanyi The Great Transformation , 1944 .

[22]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model , 1989 .

[23]  Nan Lin,et al.  Getting Ahead in Urban China , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  A. Inkeles,et al.  National Comparisons of Occupational Prestige , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  J. Rosenbaum,et al.  Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy. , 1986 .

[26]  W. Müller Class inequalities in educational outcomes : Sweden in comparative perspective , 1996 .

[27]  Ivan Szelenvi The Intelligentsia in the Class Structure of State-Socialist Societies , 1982, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  H. Lee,et al.  From Revolutionary Cadres to Party Technocrats in Socialist China , 1990, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[29]  P. Blau,et al.  Inequality of Opportunity in Urban China and America , 1990 .

[30]  A. Simkus Comparative Stratification and Mobility , 1981 .

[31]  E. Barker The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System , 1958 .

[32]  Andrew G. Walder,et al.  Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry , 1988 .

[33]  A. Inkeles,et al.  Multidimensional Ratings of Occupations , 1957 .

[34]  I. Szelenyi The Prospects and Limits of the East European New Class Project: An Auto-critical Reflection on The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power , 1987 .

[35]  R. Wong Research in Social Stratification and Mobility , 1993 .

[36]  P. Róbert,et al.  Reproduction theory on socialist ground : Intergenerational transmission of inequalities in Hungary , 1990 .

[37]  Murray Yanowitch Social and economic inequality in the Soviet Union , 1973 .

[38]  W. Miller The Soviet Citizen: Daily Life in a Totalitarian Society , 1960 .

[39]  B. Moore The Communist Party of the Soviet Union: 1928-1944: A Study in Elite Formation and Function , 1944 .

[40]  Andrew G. Walder,et al.  Career Mobility and the Communist Political Order , 1995 .

[41]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Education and Occupational Mobility: A Comparison of Polish and American Men , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  M. Chapman The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power , 1980 .