Older adults' privacy considerations for vision based recognition methods of eldercare applications.

This study aims to explore older adults' privacy considerations for technology based monitoring applications in eldercare that use video systems. It specifically aims to introduce alternative vision based tools and identify whether distorting or "anonymizing" captured images affect older adults' privacy concerns and willingness to allow such an application to be installed in their residence. Ten residents of an independent retirement community were recruited to participate in a series of scenarios. Each scenario involved a daily activity such as sitting in the living room and having a visitor, or preparing a snack. These sessions were video-recorded using different image processing and extraction approaches. Follow-up in-depth interviews with participants were conducted after a demonstration of the captured images. Findings indicate that shape extraction can alleviate privacy concerns associated with the use of cameras. Participants expressed no privacy concerns with silhouette images and emphasized the importance of anonymity in the video sequences. They furthermore expressed the desire to control system operation by being able to turn a vision-based system off and on, and also determine who has access to the collected information.

[1]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  At the Flick of a Switch: Detecting and Classifying Unique Electrical Events on the Residential Power Line (Nominated for the Best Paper Award) , 2007, UbiComp.

[2]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  TigerPlace, A State-Academic-Private Project to Revolutionize Traditional Long-Term Care , 2008, Journal of housing for the elderly.

[3]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Potential Intrusiveness of Aware Home Technology: Perceptions of Older Adults , 2004 .

[4]  G. Demiris,et al.  Technologies for an Aging Society: A Systematic Review of “Smart Home” Applications , 2008, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[5]  Evelyn Richards Proposed FBI crime computer system raises questions on accuracy, privacy , 1991 .

[6]  John Ladd,et al.  Computers and moral responsibility: a framework for an ethical analysis , 1991 .

[7]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Privacy Perceptions of an Aware Home with Visual Sensing Devices , 2005 .

[8]  M. Rantz,et al.  TigerPlace: a new future for older adults. , 2005, Journal of nursing care quality.

[9]  M. Skubic,et al.  Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  Michael G. Lamming,et al.  Locating Systems at Work: Implications for the Development of Active Badge Applications , 1992, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 1993, ECSCW.

[12]  Michael Boyle,et al.  The language of privacy: Learning from video media space analysis and design , 2005, TCHI.

[13]  Robert H. Luke,et al.  Human Segmentation from Video in Indoor Environments Using Fused Color and Texture Features , 2010 .

[14]  P Lukowicz,et al.  Wearable Systems for Health Care Applications , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[15]  James A. Landay,et al.  Personal privacy through understanding and action: five pitfalls for designers , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Karen L. Courtney,et al.  Brief Review: Defining Obtrusiveness in Home Telehealth Technologies: A Conceptual Framework , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..