Factors That Influence Older Canadians’ Preferences for using Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Structural Equation Analysis

Accessible and safe mobility is critical for those aged 65 years and older to maintain their health, quality of life, and well-being. Being able to move beyond one’s home and participate in activities in older adulthood requires consideration of both transportation needs and preferences. This paper aims to address a gap in evidence with respect to understanding factors that can affect older adults’ perceptions and willingness to use autonomous vehicles. In addition, it examines how these factors compare with those of younger adults to better understand the potential implications of this technology on mobility and quality of life. Using responses of those aged 65+ to a national survey of Canadians, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to identify and quantify factors significantly associated with older adults’ willingness to use autonomous vehicles. The SEM results suggest that factors such as using other modes of transit (e.g., sharing rides as passenger, bicycle, public transit, commuter rail, ride and car sharing) as well as distance traveled by automobile, income, gender (being male), and living in urban areas, were all positively associated with older adults’ perceptions of using autonomous driving features. The findings also suggest that older Canadians are more concerned about autonomous vehicles than younger Canadians. This study provides valuable insights into factors that can affect the preferences of Canadians when it comes to autonomous technology in their automobiles. Such results can inform the way in which transportation systems are designed to ensure the needs of users are considered across both age and ability.

[1]  A. E. Bateman The Statistics of Canada , 1878 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[3]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[4]  D. Collia,et al.  The 2001 National Household Travel Survey: a look into the travel patterns of older Americans. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[5]  D. Hensher,et al.  The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population , 2003 .

[6]  A. Bowling,et al.  Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension , 2004 .

[7]  Jin-Hyuk Chung,et al.  Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Paul A. Dion,et al.  Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling , 2008 .

[9]  P. Dion Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling Results: A Reply to Martin and Cullen , 2008 .

[10]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Evaluation of Urban Travel Training for Older Adults , 2009 .

[11]  Joo Hwan Lee,et al.  Development of a Structural Equation Model for ride comfort of the Korean high-speed railway , 2009 .

[12]  Pat Burnett,et al.  Talking, walking, riding and driving: The mobilities of older adults , 2010 .

[13]  Wan-Hui Chen,et al.  Exploring Travel Characteristics and Factors Affecting the Degree of Willingness of Seniors in Taiwan to Use an Alternative Service Bus , 2010 .

[14]  K. Desanto,et al.  Public Health Agency of Canada , 2011 .

[15]  J. Mattson Transportation, Distance, and Health Care Utilization for Older Adults in Rural and Small Urban Areas , 2011 .

[16]  Eric Yamashita,et al.  Measuring Influence of Accessibility on Accident Severity with Structural Equation Modeling , 2011 .

[17]  Sungyop Kim Transportation Alternatives of the Elderly after Driving Cessation , 2011 .

[18]  E. Boschmann,et al.  Travel behaviors, sustainable mobility, and transit-oriented developments: a travel counts analysis of older adults in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area , 2013 .

[19]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Transportation in an Aging Society , 2013 .

[20]  William Payre,et al.  Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .

[21]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .

[22]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling , 2014 .

[23]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[24]  Mark J. King,et al.  The perspectives of older drivers on the impact of feedback on their driving behaviours : a qualitative study , 2015 .

[25]  Corey D. Harper,et al.  Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions , 2016 .

[26]  Rico Krueger,et al.  Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[27]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  Transportation alternative preferences of the aging population , 2016 .

[28]  Lisa J. Molnar,et al.  Implications of advanced vehicle technologies for older drivers. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities? , 2017 .

[30]  Rosário Macário,et al.  The need for an elderly centred mobility policy , 2017 .

[31]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles and Alternatives to Driving: Trust, Preferences, and Effects of Age , 2017 .

[32]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The influence of functional health on seniors’ driving risk , 2017 .

[33]  Jacqui Smith,et al.  Prevalence, attitudes, and knowledge of in-vehicle technologies and vehicle adaptations among older drivers. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age , 2018 .