A robotic object hitting task to quantify sensorimotor impairments in participants with stroke

BackgroundExisting clinical scores of upper limb function often use observer-based ordinal scales that are subjective and commonly have floor and ceiling effects. The purpose of the present study was to develop an upper limb motor task to assess objectively the ability of participants to select and engage motor actions with both hands.MethodsA bilateral robotic system was used to quantify upper limb sensorimotor function of participants with stroke. Participants performed an object hit task that required them to hit virtual balls moving towards them in the workspace with virtual paddles attached to each hand. Task difficulty was initially low, but increased with time by increasing the speed and number of balls in the workspace. Data were collected from 262 control participants and 154 participants with recent stroke.ResultsControl participants hit ~60 to 90% of the 300 balls with relatively symmetric performance for the two arms. Participants with recent stroke performed the task with most participants hitting fewer balls than 95% of healthy controls (67% of right-affected and 87% of left-affected strokes). Additionally, nearly all participants (97%) identified with visuospatial neglect hit fewer balls than healthy controls. More detailed analyses demonstrated that most participants with stroke displayed asymmetric performance between their affected and non-affected limbs with regards to number of balls hit, workspace area covered by the limb and hand speed. Inter-rater reliability of task parameters was high with half of the correlations above 0.90. Significant correlations were observed between many of the task parameters and the Functional Independence Measure and/or the Behavioural Inattention Test.ConclusionsAs this object hit task requires just over two minutes to complete, it provides an objective and easy approach to quantify upper limb motor function and visuospatial skills following stroke.

[1]  C. Granger,et al.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. , 1987, Advances in clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  J. H. Dripps,et al.  Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 1989 .

[3]  W. Rymer,et al.  Mechatronic assessment of arm impairment after chronic brain injury. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[4]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Robotic Assessment of Sensorimotor Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2012, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[5]  April AIDS TO THE INVESTIGATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURIES , 1943 .

[6]  S. Wolf,et al.  Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, Part I: A unified approach for representing action, quantitative evaluation, and interactive feedback , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[9]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[10]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[12]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[13]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[16]  B. Wilson,et al.  Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[18]  Hermano I. Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: An academic engineer perspective , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Time-Related Changes in Motor Performance of the Upper Extremity Ipsilateral to the Side of the Lesion in Stroke Survivors , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  M. R. Velicki,et al.  Impaired direction and extent specification of aimed arm movements in humans with stroke-related brain damage , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  [Role of rehabilitation in hemineglect syndromes]. , 2001, Revue neurologique.

[23]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Roland R. Lee,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Discriminant validity of a new measure of self-efficacy for reaching movements after stroke-induced hemiparesis. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[26]  M. Goodale,et al.  The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  C. Lang,et al.  Person-specific changes in motor performance accompany upper extremity functional gains after stroke. , 2012, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[28]  Carl P. T. Jackson,et al.  Sensory-motor deficits in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder assessed using a robotic virtual reality platform. , 2014, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[29]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  D. Harrington,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of movement , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[32]  Miao-Ju Hsu,et al.  Psychometric Comparisons of 2 Versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 Versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[34]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Corrigendum to: “Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy” [Neuropsychologia 47 (13) (2009) 2953–2966] , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[36]  C. Lang,et al.  Comparison of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Upper Extremity Task Performance After Stroke , 2012, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[37]  Robert A. Scheidt,et al.  A quantitative and standardized robotic method for the evaluation of arm proprioception after stroke , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  B. Volpe,et al.  Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[39]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  S. Scott,et al.  The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  Janice I. Glasgow,et al.  Assessment of Upper-Limb Sensorimotor Function of Subacute Stroke Patients Using Visually Guided Reaching , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[42]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  C Scheffer,et al.  Inertial motion capture in conjunction with an artificial neural network can differentiate the gait patterns of hemiparetic stroke patients compared with able-bodied counterparts , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[44]  N. Hogan,et al.  Measurement of passive ankle stiffness in subjects with chronic hemiparesis using a novel ankle robot. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  S. Scott,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Limb Position Sense Following Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[47]  K. Haaland,et al.  Functional significance of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[48]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Q&A: Robotics as a tool to understand the brain , 2010, BMC Biology.

[49]  Valentina Squeri,et al.  Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[50]  A. Sunderland Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke. , 2000, Stroke.

[51]  S. Scott,et al.  Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[52]  B. I. Molier,et al.  Objective measurement of synergistic movement patterns of the upper extremity following stroke: An explorative study , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[53]  John W Chow,et al.  Agreement Between Temporospatial Gait Parameters of an Electronic Walkway and a Motion Capture System in Healthy and Chronic Stroke Populations , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[54]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[55]  W. T. Thach,et al.  How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Development and Validation of the First Robotic Scale for the Clinical Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Impairments in Stroke Patients , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[57]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Normalized Movement Quality Measures for Therapeutic Robots Strongly Correlate With Clinical Motor Impairment Measures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[58]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[59]  C. J. Winstein,et al.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.