Thought Beyond Language

A central question in cognitive science is whether natural language provides combinatorial operations that are essential to diverse domains of thought. In the study reported here, we addressed this issue by examining the role of linguistic mechanisms in forging the hierarchical structures of algebra. In a 3-T functional MRI experiment, we showed that processing of the syntax-like operations of algebra does not rely on the neural mechanisms of natural language. Our findings indicate that processing the syntax of language elicits the known substrate of linguistic competence, whereas algebraic operations recruit bilateral parietal brain regions previously implicated in the representation of magnitude. This double dissociation argues against the view that language provides the structure of thought across all cognitive domains.

[1]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Logic, language and the brain , 2012, Brain Research.

[2]  Noam Chomsky.  Language and Problems of Knowledge , 1987 .

[3]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of deductive inference: A language-independent distributed network , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight! , 2003 .

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  A. Anwander,et al.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Tettamanti,et al.  Broca's Area: a Supramodal Hierarchical Processor? , 2006, Cortex.

[9]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  The battle for Broca’s region , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  R. Shalev,et al.  Developmental Dyscalculia , 2004, Journal of child neurology.

[11]  Stefan Heim,et al.  Are numbers special? Comparing the generation of verbal materials from ordered categories (months) to numbers and other categories (animals) in an fMRI study , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications , 2005, Cognition.

[13]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Neural bases of focusing attention in working memory: An fMRI study based on group differences , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[16]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Sentence Syntax and Content in the Human Temporal Lobe: An fMRI Adaptation Study in Auditory and Visual Modalities , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  G. Orban,et al.  Processing of Abstract Ordinal Knowledge in the Horizontal Segment of the Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Neural Correlates of Simple and Complex Mental Calculation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Double Dissociation of Format-Dependent and Number-Specific Neurons in Human Parietal Cortex , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Jamie I. D. Campbell.  Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Spared numerical abilities in a case of semantic dementia , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  G. Altmann.  Science and Linguistics , 1993 .

[25]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Serial Organization of Human Behavior in the Inferior Parietal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[27]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Parallel memory systems for talking about location and age in precuneus, caudate and Broca's region , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[29]  Jérôme Prado,et al.  Overlapping and distinct neural representations of numbers and verbal transitive series. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Deductive Inference , 2006 .

[31]  L. Craighero,et al.  Broca's Area in Language, Action, and Music , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Jared M. Novick,et al.  Broca's Area and Language Processing: Evidence for the Cognitive Control Connection , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[33]  D. Osherson,et al.  The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Honda,et al.  The role of rostral Brodmann area 6 in mental-operation tasks: an integrative neuroimaging approach. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Laure Zago,et al.  How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: An fMRI study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  B. Postle,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Is Critical for the Manipulation of Information in Working Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Mazzocco,et al.  Language Use in Females with Fragile X or Turner Syndrome During Brief Initial Social Interactions , 2006, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[39]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Language and number: a bilingual training study , 2001, Cognition.

[40]  G. Denes,et al.  A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[42]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Agrammatic but numerate. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.