New Frontiers in the Theorization of ICT-Mediated Interaction: Exploring the Implications of a Situated Learning Epistemology

This paper suggests that recent contributions to the knowledge management literature could be taken to constitute a dramatic epistemic shift for the information systems field, which may open new frontiers in the theorization of information, communication, and forms of ICT-mediated social interaction. Specifically, it argues that a move away from an overly “intellectualist” conception of information and communication (and attendant forms of representationalism) offers the prospect of reconceptualizing the role of ICT as a complementary mode of engagement with the life world, which may facilitate distinctive forms of collective sensemaking/learning. Moreover, it suggests that by conceptualizing such processes as a duality of reification and social participation (following Wenger 1998), the specific material constitution of the technology (i.e., the form of the medium), and its significance for mediating and shaping important features of social interaction and the relationships that underpin them, is brought firmly into the analytical foreground. Among other things, this may offer promising opportunities for a more substantive theorization of the ICT artefact (see Monteiro and Hanseth 1996; Orlikowski and Iacono 2001). As a tentative first step in this new terrain, the concept of “digiscribing” is offered as an alternative to Zuboff’s (1988) influential notion of “informating,” as a means of thinking about the relationship between information, ICT, and organizations. The ideas are illustrated and developed with reference to an in-depth, interpretive study of groupware implementation and use at a large global consulting services firm.

[1]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[2]  J. Carrier Gifts, commodities, and social relations: A Maussian view of exchange , 1991 .

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[5]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  The Social Life of Information Systems Research: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[9]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  The word and the world: a critique of representationalism in management research , 1998 .

[10]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and teamwork in new product development: the case of a consumer goods multinational , 1997 .

[11]  Blake Ives,et al.  Phylogeny and Power in the IS Domain: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[13]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Redefining the social link: from baboons to humans , 1987 .

[14]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[15]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Boundary Disputes: : Negotiating the Boundary between the Technical and the Social in the Development of IT Systems , 1994 .

[16]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[17]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[18]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[19]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[20]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[21]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[24]  R. McDermott Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[25]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Identity, Legitimacy and the Dominant Research Paradigm: An Alternative Prescription for the IS Discipline: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Michael J. Reddy Metaphor and Thought: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language , 1993 .

[27]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[29]  P. Kollock The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[30]  G. Walsham Knowledge Management:: The Benefits and Limitations of Computer Systems , 2001 .

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.