Do aphids actively search for ant partners?

The aphid–ant mutualistic relationships are not necessarily obligate for neither partners but evidence is that such interactions provide them strong advantages in terms of global fitness. While it is largely assumed that ants actively search for their mutualistic partners namely using volatile cues; whether winged aphids (i.e., aphids’ most mobile form) are able to select ant‐frequented areas had not been investigated so far. Ant‐frequented sites would indeed offer several advantages for these aphids including a lower predation pressure through ant presence and enhanced chances of establishing mutuaslistic interactions with neighbor ant colonies. In the field, aphid colonies are often observed in higher densities around ant nests, which is probably linked to a better survival ensured by ants’ services. Nevertheless, this could also result from a preferential establishment of winged aphids in ant‐frequented areas. We tested this last hypothesis through different ethological assays and show that the facultative myrmecophilous black bean aphid, Aphis fabae L., does not orientate its search for a host plant preferentially toward ant‐frequented plants. However, our results suggest that ants reduce the number of winged aphids leaving the newly colonized plant. Thus, ants involved in facultative myrmecophilous interactions with aphids appear to contribute to structure aphid populations in the field by ensuring a better establishment and survival of newly established colonies rather than by inducing a deliberate plant selection by aphid partners based on the proximity of ant colonies.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  I. Yao Ant attendance reduces flight muscle and wing size in the aphid Tuberculatus quercicola , 2012, Biology Letters.

[3]  Claire Detrain,et al.  Aphid Alarm Pheromone as a Cue for Ants to Locate Aphid Partners , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  T. Novgorodova,et al.  The degree of protection different ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) against aphidophages , 2012 .

[5]  F. Menzel,et al.  Lasius niger ants discriminate aphids based on their cuticular hydrocarbons , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  D. Holway,et al.  Context‐dependence in an ant–aphid mutualism: direct effects of tending intensity on aphid performance , 2011 .

[7]  C. Detrain,et al.  Aphid–ant mutualism: how honeydew sugars influence the behaviour of ant scouts , 2010 .

[8]  M. Miñarro,et al.  Role of ants in structuring the aphid community on apple , 2010 .

[9]  Claire Detrain,et al.  Mutualisme pucerons-fourmis : étude des bénéfices retirés par les colonies d’Aphis fabae en milieu extérieur , 2009 .

[10]  J. Kennedy,et al.  BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF THE COMMON GARDEN ANT, LASIUS NIGER L., ON THE BLACK BEAN APHID, APHIS FABAE SCOPOLI. , 2009 .

[11]  D. J. Horn,et al.  Effect of Ant Attendance by Monomorium minimum (Buckley) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Predation and Parasitism of the Soybean Aphid Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae) , 2008, Environmental entomology.

[12]  C. Detrain,et al.  Aphid-ant mutualism: an outdoor study of the benefits for Aphis fabae colonies , 2008 .

[13]  Alla Mashanova,et al.  Ant semiochemicals limit apterous aphid dispersal , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  G. Poppy,et al.  The effect of ant attendance on the success of rosy apple aphid populations, natural enemy abundance and apple damage in orchards , 2007 .

[15]  Benoit Guénard Mutualisme fourmis pucerons et guilde aphidiphage associée : le cas de la prédation furtive , 2007 .

[16]  J. McNeil,et al.  Effect of Wind Speed on the Pheromone-Mediated Behavior of Sexual Morphs of the Potato Aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas) Under Laboratory and Field Conditions , 2006, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[17]  H. Sakata Density-dependent predation of the antLasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on two attended aphidsLachnus tropicalis andMyzocallis kuricola (Homoptera: Aphididae) , 1995, Researches on Population Ecology.

[18]  A. Dixon,et al.  ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF APHID-ANT INTERACTIONS , 2005 .

[19]  K. Dettner,et al.  Role of cuticular hydrocarbons of aphid parasitoids in their relationship to aphid-attending ants , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[20]  G. W. Hopkins,et al.  Ants and Habitat Specificity in Aphids , 1999, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[21]  C. M. Bristow,et al.  Effects of the Presence of the Allegheny Mound Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Providing Enemy-Free Space to Myrmecophilous Aphid and Soft Scale Populations , 2003 .

[22]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Competition for mutualists in an ant - homopteran interaction mediated by hierarchies of ant attendance. , 2001 .

[23]  H. Shibao,et al.  Costs and benefits of ant attendance to the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola , 2000 .

[24]  H. Sakata Indirect interactions between two aphid species in relation to ant attendance , 1999, Ecological Research.

[25]  D. W. Zimmerman,et al.  Relative Power of the Wilcoxon Test, the Friedman Test, and Repeated-Measures ANOVA on Ranks , 1993 .

[26]  J. Addicott,et al.  Density‐Dependent Mutualism in an Aphid‐Ant Interaction , 1992 .

[27]  T. Seibert Mutualistic interactions of the aphid Lachnus allegheniensis (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its tending ant Formica obscuripes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1992 .

[28]  Christine Woodcock,et al.  The Chemical Ecology of Aphids , 1992 .

[29]  A. Dixon,et al.  Dispersal in Aphids, A Problem in Resource Allocation , 1986 .

[30]  T. Mittler,et al.  A CHEMICAL INFLUENCE OF ANTS ON WING DEVELOPMENT IN APHIDS , 1975 .

[31]  M. Way Mutualism Between Ants and Honeydew-Producing Homoptera , 1963 .