Assessment of technical efficiency of farmer teachers in the uptake and dissemination of push-pull technology in Western Kenya

Abstract Use of farmers as extension agents to disseminate new technologies to others is increasingly being adapted in smallholder farming systems. This paper examined technical efficiency (TE) of farmer teachers in the uptake and dissemination of a ‘push–pull’ technology (PPT) for control of Striga weed and stemborers in Western Kenya. A total sample of 112 farmer teachers (FTs) and 560 follower farmers (FFs) who had adopted the PPT were randomly selected and interviewed between July and August 2007. The farm production constraints significantly reduced with an overall 53% margin following PPT uptake. Overall, there were considerable benefits from training resulting in significant differences in understanding and applying of PPT. The farmers' extension strategy had a significant multiplier effect in increasing PPT uptake. The average TE by FTs was 78% while FFs had 71% suggesting room for improvement. The TE was influenced by farmers' interactions with neighbouring farmers, memberships in local groups, type of farmer, farmer's age, marital status and farmer's level of education. The efficiency can be improved by providing farmers with incentives and training, increasing field demonstrations, providing Desmodium seed and credit for other needed inputs to accelerate PPT transfer.

[1]  William A. Overholt,et al.  Control of Witchweed Striga hermonthica by Intercropping with Desmodium spp., and the Mechanism Defined as Allelopathic , 2002, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[2]  L. Wadhams,et al.  Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) varieties for use as trap plants for the management of African stemborer (Busseola fusca) in a push–pull strategy , 2007 .

[3]  Christine M. Woodcock,et al.  Exploiting chemical ecology and species diversity : stem borer and striga control for maize and sorghum in Africa , 2000 .

[4]  Zeyaur R. Khan,et al.  Evaluation of farmers' field days as a dissemination tool for push-pull technology in Western Kenya. , 2009 .

[5]  K. Chamberlain,et al.  Diel Periodicity in the Production of Green Leaf Volatiles by Wild and Cultivated Host Plants of Stemborer Moths, Chilo partellus and Busseola fusca , 2006, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[6]  A. Parikh,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN THE NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN , 1994 .

[7]  B. Jama,et al.  Scaling up adoption and impact of agroforestry technologies: Experiences from western Kenya , 2001 .

[8]  Zeyaur R. Khan,et al.  On-farm evaluation of the 'push-pull' technology for the control of stemborers and striga weed on maize in western Kenya , 2008 .

[9]  Sara Savastano,et al.  The Role of Opinion Leaders in the Diffusion of New Knowledge: The Case of Integrated Pest Management , 2006 .

[10]  Jonathan Gressel,et al.  Integrating New Technologies for Striga Control: Towards Ending the Witch-Hunt , 2007 .

[11]  Linda L. Price,et al.  An Agency Perspective on New Technology Champions , 1992 .

[12]  E. Terry,et al.  Delivery of Agricultural Technology to Resource‐poor Farmers in Africa , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Ababa,et al.  Farmer Field Schools: A Boon or Bust for Extension in Africa? , 2006 .

[14]  F. Kwesiga,et al.  Enhancing Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa through IAR4D and Competitive Grants Processes: Experiences and Lessons. , 2006 .

[15]  Akinwumi A. Adesina,et al.  Determinants of farmers' adoption and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria , 2002, Agroforestry Systems.

[16]  Gershon Feder,et al.  Sending Farmers Back to School: The Impact of Farmer Field Schools in Indonesia , 2003 .

[17]  Rosemary Atieno,et al.  Agricultural Policy in Kenya: Issues and Processes. , 2006 .

[18]  L. Tauer.  Age and Farmer Productivity , 1994 .

[19]  J. Pickett,et al.  The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. , 2007, Annual review of entomology.

[20]  Jeroen Buysse,et al.  A measure for the efficiency of water use and its determinants, a case study of small-scale irrigation schemes in North-West Province, South Africa , 2008 .

[21]  V. Okoruwa,et al.  Comparative analysis of technical efficiency between traditional and improved rice variety farmers in Nigeria , 2006 .

[22]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[23]  V. Okoruwa,et al.  Technical Efficiency Differentials in Rice Production Technologies in Nigeria , 2006 .

[24]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Social capital : a multifaceted perspective , 1999 .

[25]  Katrine A. Weidemann C. Jean Saito.  Agricultural extension for women farmers in Africa , 1990 .

[26]  W. Grisley.  Farmer-to-farmer transfer of new crop varieties: an empirical analysis on small farms in Uganda , 1994 .

[27]  A. Alene,et al.  Farmer‐to‐farmer technology diffusion and yield variation among adopters: the case of improved cowpea in northern Nigeria , 2006 .

[28]  Zeyaur R. Khan,et al.  Farmers’ perceptions of a ‘push–pull’ technology for control of cereal stemborers and Striga weed in western Kenya , 2008 .

[29]  A. Aw-Hassan,et al.  THE ROLE OF INFORMAL FARMER-TO-FARMER SEED DISTRIBUTION IN DIFFUSION OF NEW BARLEY VARIETIES IN SYRIA , 2008, Experimental Agriculture.

[30]  Patricia M. Kristjanson,et al.  Pathways out of poverty in western Kenya and the role of livestock , 2004 .

[31]  Miguel A. Altieri,et al.  Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods , 2004 .

[32]  J. Pickett,et al.  The 'push-pull' strategy for stemborer management: a case study in exploiting biodiversity and chemical ecology , 2004 .

[33]  M. Waithaka,et al.  Adoption of fodder legumes technology through farmer-to-farmer extension approach , 2004 .

[34]  Inoni Odjuvwuederhie Emmanuel,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF YAM PRODUCTION AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY AMONG SMALL-HOLDER FARMERS IN SOUTHEASTERN NIGERIA , 2006 .

[35]  H. Hamburg,et al.  Oviposition preference and survival of the maize stem borer, Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae), on Napier grasses, Pennisetum spp., and maize , 2006 .

[36]  Samuel T. Hunter,et al.  Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development , 2007 .

[37]  P. Murray,et al.  Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty , 2001 .

[38]  Robert Tripp,et al.  What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study , 2005 .

[39]  Richard M. Wilkins,et al.  Assessment of the potential of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) varieties as trap plants for management of Chilo partellus , 2006 .

[40]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[41]  S. Franzel,et al.  Scaling up the benefits of agroforestry research: Lessons learned and research challenges , 2001 .

[42]  C. Chikozho.  Policy and institutional dimensions of small-holder farmer innovations in the Thukela River Basin of South Africa and the Pangani River Basin of Tanzania: A comparative perspective , 2005 .

[43]  Zeyaur Khan,et al.  Isoflavanones from the allelopathic aqueous root exudate of Desmodium uncinatum. , 2003, Phytochemistry.

[44]  Seidu Al-hassan,et al.  Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana , 2008 .

[45]  Rinku Murgai,et al.  Fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: the case of the farmer field school approach , 2001 .

[46]  James R. Miller,et al.  Stimulo-deterrent diversion: A concept and its possible application to onion maggot control , 1990, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[47]  Hasnah,et al.  Assessing the performance of a nucleus estate and smallholder scheme for oil palm production in West Sumatra: a stochastic frontier analysis , 2004 .