Are You Smiling, or Have I Seen You Before? Familiarity Makes Faces Look Happier

It is clear that unreinforced repetition (familiarization) influences affective responses to social stimuli, but its effects on the perception of facial emotion are unknown. Reporting the results of two experiments, we show for the first time that repeated exposure enhances the perceived happiness of facial expressions. In Experiment 1, using a paradigm in which subjects’ responses were orthogonal to happiness in order to avoid response biases, we found that faces of individuals who had previously been shown were deemed happier than novel faces. In Experiment 2, we replicated this effect with a rapid “happy or angry” categorization task. Using psychometric function fitting, we found that for subjects to classify a face as happy, they needed less actual happiness to be present in the face if the target was familiar than if it was novel. Critically, our results suggest that familiar faces appear happier than novel faces because familiarity selectively enhances the impact of positive stimulus features.

[1]  P. Winkielman,et al.  Transforming the mirror: power fundamentally changes facial responding to emotional expressions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Sebastian Korb,et al.  The two sides of spontaneity: Movement onset asymmetries in facial expressions influence social judgments , 2014 .

[3]  Mark Brosnan,et al.  Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set – Bath Intensity Variations (ADFES-BIV): A Set of Videos Expressing Low, Intermediate, and High Intensity Emotions , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[5]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[6]  B. Scholl,et al.  Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects , 2015, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[8]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood as Information: 20 Years Later , 2003 .

[9]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Positivity Can Cue Familiarity , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Attention Alters Perceived Attractiveness , 2016, Psychological science.

[11]  Albert Newen,et al.  Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  quickpsy: An R Package to Fit Psychometric Functions for Multiple Groups , 2016, R J..

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Angela Y. Lee The Mere Exposure Effect: An Uncertainty Reduction Explanation Revisited , 2001 .

[15]  D. Pecher,et al.  The Ugliness-in-Averageness Effect: Tempering the Warm Glow of Familiarity , 2017, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, Research Methods, and the Logic of Conversation , 2014 .

[17]  C. Carbon,et al.  The Fluency Amplification Model: fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[18]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[19]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Familiar eyes are smiling: On the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect , 2007 .

[20]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  George Mandler,et al.  Nonspecific Effects of Exposure on Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 1987 .

[22]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  D. Mackie,et al.  Familiarity increases subjective positive affect even in non-affective and non-evaluative contexts , 2016 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[26]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[27]  W. Kessen A Textbook of Psychology , 1958, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[28]  R. Zajonc Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal , 2001 .

[29]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Moving faces, looking places: validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). , 2011, Emotion.

[30]  Brady T. West,et al.  Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software , 2006 .

[31]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Implicit Learning and Generalization of the "Mere Exposure" Effect , 1983 .

[32]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Exposure, object preference, and distress in the domestic chick. , 1974 .

[33]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood as Information: 20 Years Later , 2003 .

[34]  M. Carrasco,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Emotion Facilitates Perception and Potentiates the Perceptual Benefits of Attention , 2022 .

[35]  C. McCollough Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[36]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  The Role of Affect in the Mere Exposure Effect: Evidence from Psychophysiological and Individual Differences Approaches , 2001 .

[37]  R. Gur,et al.  The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. , 2010, Emotion.

[38]  B. Monin The warm glow heuristic: when liking leads to familiarity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.