Using gap-filled MAIAC AOD and WRF-Chem to estimate daily PM2.5 concentrations at 1 km resolution in the Eastern United States

Abstract To link short-term exposures of air pollutants to health outcomes, scientists must use high temporal and spatial resolution estimates of PM2.5 concentrations. In this work, we develop a daily PM2.5 product at 1 × 1 km2 spatial resolution across the eastern United States (east of 90° W) with the aid of 1 × 1 km2 MAIAC aerosol optical depth (AOD) data, 36 × 36 km2 WRF-Chem output, 1 × 1 km2 land-use type from the National Land Cover Database, and 0.125° × 0.125° ERA-Interim re-analysis meteorology. A gap-filling technique is applied to MAIAC AOD data to construct robust daily estimates of AOD when the satellite data are missing (e.g., areas obstructed by clouds or snow cover). The input data are incorporated into a multiple-linear regression model trained to surface observations of PM2.5 from the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) monitoring network. The model generates a high-fidelity estimate (r2 = 0.75 using a 10-fold random cross-validation) of daily PM2.5 throughout the eastern United States. Of the inputs to the statistical model, WRF-Chem output (r2 = 0.66) is the most important contributor to the skill of the model. MAIAC AOD is also a strong contributor (r2 = 0.52). Daily PM2.5 output from our statistical model can be easily integrated into county-level epidemiological studies. The novelty of this project is that we are able to simulate PM2.5 in a computationally efficient manner that is constrained to ground monitors, satellite data, and chemical transport model output at high spatial resolution (1 × 1 km2) without sacrificing the temporal resolution (daily) or spatial coverage (>2,000,000 km2).

[1]  Yang Liu,et al.  Using aerosol optical thickness to predict ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the St. Louis area: A comparison between MISR and MODIS , 2007 .

[2]  G. Grell,et al.  Implementation and initial application of new chemistry-aerosol options in WRF/Chem for simulating secondary organic aerosols and aerosol indirect effects for regional air quality , 2015 .

[3]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Impact of future climate policy scenarios on air quality and aerosol-cloud interactions using an advanced version of CESM/CAM5: Part II. Future trend analysis and impacts of projected anthropogenic emissions , 2017 .

[4]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 27 US communities , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[5]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  Seasonal composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the United States , 2012 .

[6]  Jun Wang,et al.  Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies , 2003 .

[7]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  MODIS 3 km aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective , 2013 .

[8]  D. Jacob,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 in the eastern United States using satellite remote sensing. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  J. Schwartz,et al.  A hybrid prediction model for PM2.5 mass and components using a chemical transport model and land use regression , 2016 .

[10]  J. Jason West,et al.  An Estimate of the Global Burden of Anthropogenic Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter on Premature Human Mortality Using Atmospheric Modeling , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Yang Liu,et al.  Estimating Regional Spatial and Temporal Variability of PM2.5 Concentrations Using Satellite Data, Meteorology, and Land Use Information , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  P. Gupta,et al.  Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality: The Cloud-Cover Problem , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  A. Just,et al.  A New Hybrid Spatio-Temporal Model For Estimating Daily Multi-Year PM2.5 Concentrations Across Northeastern USA Using High Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Data. , 2014, Atmospheric environment.

[14]  D. Jacob,et al.  Mapping annual mean ground‐level PM2.5 concentrations using Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contiguous United States , 2004 .

[15]  J. H. Belle,et al.  Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Thomas M. Peters,et al.  Federal Reference and Equivalent Methods for Measuring Fine Particulate Matter , 2001 .

[17]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing temporally and spatially resolved PM2.5 exposures for epidemiological studies using satellite aerosol optical depth measurements , 2011 .

[18]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Impact of future climate policy scenarios on air quality and aerosol-cloud interactions using an advanced version of CESM/CAM5: Part I. model evaluation for the current decadal simulations , 2017 .

[19]  Jin Huang,et al.  Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation , 2013 .

[20]  R. Hoff,et al.  The Relation between Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aerosol Optical Depth and PM2.5 over the United States: A Geographical Comparison by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regions , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Development of West-European PM2.5 and NO2 land use regression models incorporating satellite-derived and chemical transport modelling data. , 2016, Environmental research.

[22]  Basil W. Coutant,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality , 2004 .

[23]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[24]  Alexei Lyapustin,et al.  MODIS Collection 6 MAIAC algorithm , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[25]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Incorporating local land use regression and satellite aerosol optical depth in a hybrid model of spatiotemporal PM2.5 exposures in the Mid-Atlantic states. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  D. Chu,et al.  Improving National Air Quality Forecasts with Satellite Aerosol Observations , 2005 .

[27]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variation in PM2.5 Chemical Composition in the United States for Health Effects Studies , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  Jun Wang,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter and air quality assessment over global cities , 2006 .

[29]  R. Martin,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing , 2006 .

[30]  Richard T Burnett,et al.  High-Resolution Satellite-Derived PM2.5 from Optimal Estimation and Geographically Weighted Regression over North America. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Yujie Wang,et al.  Assessing PM2.5 Exposures with High Spatiotemporal Resolution across the Continental United States. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Is Daily Mortality Associated Specifically with Fine Particles? , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[33]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Within-urban variability in ambient air pollution: Comparison of estimation methods , 2008 .

[34]  Roger D. Peng,et al.  Short-term Exposure to Particulate Matter Constituents and Mortality in a National Study of U.S. Urban Communities , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[35]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Daily estimation of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations at 4km resolution over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei by fusing MODIS AOD and ground observations. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  A. Nenes,et al.  Modeling Regional Air Quality and Climate: Improving Organic Aerosol and Aerosol Activation Processes in WRF/Chem version 3.7.1 , 2016 .

[38]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  Optimal estimation for global ground‐level fine particulate matter concentrations , 2013 .

[39]  P. Gupta,et al.  Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: Multiple regression approach , 2009 .

[40]  B. Holben,et al.  Global monitoring of air pollution over land from the Earth Observing System-Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) , 2003 .

[41]  F. Dominici,et al.  Emergency Admissions for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases and the Chemical Composition of Fine Particle Air Pollution , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[42]  L. Remer,et al.  The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean , 2013 .

[43]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e‐Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations , 2014 .

[44]  Henian Zhang,et al.  Quantifying the relationship between extreme air pollution events and extreme weather events , 2017 .

[45]  M. G. Estes,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM(2.5) concentrations in the southeastern U.S. using geographically weighted regression. , 2013, Environmental research.

[46]  P. Gupta,et al.  An evaluation of Terra-MODIS sampling for monthly and annual particulate matter air quality assessment over the Southeastern United States , 2008 .

[47]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[48]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[49]  J. Gulliver,et al.  A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution , 2008 .

[50]  P. Gupta,et al.  Particulate Matter Air Quality Assessment using Integrated Surface, Satellite, and Meteorological Products , 2009 .

[51]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of Daily PM2.5 Distributions Derived from the Fusion of Ground-Level Measurements with Aerosol Optical Depth Observations, a Case Study in North China. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[53]  J. Schwartz,et al.  A novel calibration approach of MODIS AOD data to predict PM2.5 concentrations , 2011 .