Evaluation of five different cDNA labeling methods for microarrays using spike controls

BackgroundSeveral different cDNA labeling methods have been developed for microarray based gene expression analysis. We have examined the accuracy and reproducibility of such five commercially available methods in detection of predetermined ratio values from target spike mRNAs (A. thaliana) in a background of total RNA. The five different labeling methods were: direct labeling (CyScribe), indirect labeling (FairPlay™ – aminoallyl), two protocols with dendrimer technology (3DNA® Array 50™ and 3DNA® submicro™), and hapten-antibody enzymatic labeling (Micromax™ TSA™). Ten spike controls were mixed to give expected Cy5/Cy3 ratios in the range 0.125 to 6.0. The amounts of total RNA used in the labeling reactions ranged from 5 – 50 μg.ResultsThe 3DNA array 50 and CyScribe labeling methods performed best with respect to relative deviation from the expected values (16% and 17% respectively). These two methods also displayed the best overall accuracy and reproducibility. The FairPlay method had the lowest total experimental variation (22%), but the estimated values were consistently higher than the expected values (36%). TSA had both the largest experimental variation and the largest deviation from the expected values (45% and 48% respectively).ConclusionWe demonstrate the usefulness of spike controls in validation and comparison of cDNA labeling methods for microarray experiments.

[1]  G E Archer,et al.  Maximization of signal derived from cDNA microarrays. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[2]  R L Stears,et al.  A novel, sensitive detection system for high-density microarrays using dendrimer technology. , 2000, Physiological genomics.

[3]  Kevin R Coombes,et al.  Sources of nonlinearity in cDNA microarray expression measurements , 2001, Genome Biology.

[4]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  G. A. Whitmore,et al.  Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Elisabetta Manduchi,et al.  Comparison of different labeling methods for two-channel high-density microarray experiments. , 2002, Physiological genomics.

[7]  M. Oh,et al.  Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  E. Wolski,et al.  Normalization strategies for cDNA microarrays. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Shigeo Yoshida,et al.  Evaluation and optimization of procedures for target labeling and hybridization of cDNA microarrays. , 2002, Molecular vision.

[10]  C Schwager,et al.  Comparison of fluorescent tag DNA labeling methods used for expression analysis by DNA microarrays. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[11]  A. Schulze,et al.  Navigating gene expression using microarrays — a technology review , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  John Aach,et al.  Measuring absolute expression with microarrays with a calibrated reference sample and an extended signal intensity range , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  X. Wang,et al.  Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Neil Winegarden,et al.  Representation is faithfully preserved in global cDNA amplified exponentially from sub-picogram quantities of mRNA , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  T. Hastie,et al.  Optimization and evaluation of T7 based RNA linear amplification protocols for cDNA microarray analysis , 2002, BMC Genomics.

[16]  R. Nuttall,et al.  An evaluation of the performance of cDNA microarrays for detecting changes in global mRNA expression. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  K R Coombes,et al.  Cancer genomics: promises and complexities. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[18]  Yidong Chen,et al.  Amine-modified random primers to label probes for DNA microarrays , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  D W Galbraith,et al.  High-density microarrays for gene expression analysis. , 2001, Cytometry.

[20]  Jean Yee Hwa Yang,et al.  Analysis of CDNA Microarray Images , 2001, Briefings Bioinform..

[21]  J. Yguerabide,et al.  Light-scattering submicroscopic particles as highly fluorescent analogs and their use as tracer labels in clinical and biological applications. , 1998, Analytical biochemistry.