Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.

Image quality for similar exposure conditions has been compared for two computed radiography (CR) systems (needle-based and conventional storage phosphor) and two flat-panel (DR) systems from different manufacturers mainly devoted to chest radiology. Image quality was assessed with a contrast-detail object and acrylic material to simulate clinical conditions. Specific image evaluation software was used to measure the contrast and obtain an image quality figure. Phantom and detector incident air kerma were measured for all images. Image quality differences were significant, and in the range of 100-300 microGy (phantom incident air kerma) the needle-based CR system and one of the DR systems show similar image quality and they are quite superior when compared with the conventional CR system.

[1]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Comparison of Low-Contrast Detail Perception on Storage Phosphor Radiographs and Digital Flat Panel Detector Images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Håkan Geijer,et al.  Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study , 2001, European Radiology.

[3]  C P Lawinski,et al.  Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images—comparison with subjective visual assessment , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Icrp.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[5]  Håkan Geijer,et al.  A Clinical Evaluation of the Image Quality Computer Program, CoCIQ , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  J. I. Ten,et al.  Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  D. Blanc,et al.  European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images , 1998 .

[8]  M. Körner,et al.  Depiction of Low-Contrast Detail in Digital Radiography: Comparison of Powder- and Needle-Structured Storage Phosphor Systems , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[9]  C. Decker,et al.  Bildqualität und Dosis in der Digitalen Projektionsradiographie , 2003 .

[10]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Flat Panel Digital Radiography Compared With Storage Phosphor Computed Radiography: Assessment of Dose Versus Image Quality in Phantom Studies , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Geoffrey G. Eichholz.  Managing Patient Dose in Digital Radiology , 2005 .