Connecting the dots: network development, information flow, and creativity in groups

In today's knowledge-based economy, the ability to produce highly novel and practical ideas is critical to an organization's survival. This paper draws upon social perspectives of creativity (Perry-Smith & Shalley, 2003) and the vital role of recombinant information in creative development (Barron & Harrington, 1981; Hargadon, 2003) to explore information exchange probabilities; exchanges among group members who are deep-level similar fosters incremental creative potential while information exchanges among group members who are deep-level dissimilar fosters radical creative potential. The dynamics of attraction suggest group members are most likely to interact with people who are least likely to facilitate radical creativity. Using a computer simulation we examine how proximity may be used to facilitate information exchanges among deep-level diverse group members to increase the potential for radical creativity. Results suggest the use of proximity to create strong ties among deep-level dissimilar group members may facilitate radical creativity in groups.

[1]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[2]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge‐Sharing Capabilities , 2006 .

[3]  Anthony E. Boardman,et al.  Network Externalities and Government Restrictions on Satellite Broadcasting of Key Sporting Events , 1999 .

[4]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[5]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[6]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Preferences, Identity, and Competition: Predicting Tie Strength from Demographic Data , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Frederick C. Miner,et al.  Group versus individual decision making: An investigation of performance measures, decision strategies, and process losses/gains , 1984 .

[8]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[9]  C. Gersick,et al.  LEARNING FROM ACADEMIA: THE IMPORTANCE OF RELATIONSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL LIFE , 2000 .

[10]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  Fostering product innovation in industry networks: the mediating role of knowledge integration , 2006 .

[11]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[12]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Divided Loyalties , 2007 .

[14]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[16]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[17]  Rick L. Riolo,et al.  Beyond Geography: Cooperation with Persistent Links in the Absence of Clustered Neighborhoods , 2002 .

[18]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[19]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[20]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[22]  J. Perry-Smith.  Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[23]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communication and Motivational Predictors of the Dynamics of Organizational Innovation , 1992 .

[24]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[25]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  R. Veitch,et al.  Preacquaintance Attitude Similarity and Attraction Revisited: Ten Days in a Fall-Out Shelter* , 1974 .

[27]  Gregory A. Caldeira,et al.  Political Friendship in the Legislature , 1987, The Journal of Politics.

[28]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries , 2004 .

[30]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[31]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Positions in Networks , 1976 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[34]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[35]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[36]  Tim Miller,et al.  Six Sigma engages physicians in achieving strategic performance improvement at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center , 2008 .

[37]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[38]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Experiments in measuring neighbor and relative social networks , 1988 .

[40]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[41]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[42]  C. Shalley,et al.  A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes , 2004 .

[43]  A. Cropley.  In Praise of Convergent Thinking , 2006 .

[44]  A. Kaluzny,et al.  Innovation of health services: a comparative study of hospitals and health departments. , 1974, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.

[45]  Terri A. Scandura,et al.  Dysfunctional Mentoring Relationships and Outcomes , 1998 .

[46]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[47]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Demographic antecedents and performance consequences of structural holes in work teams , 2007 .

[48]  M. Glynn.  Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation , 1996 .

[49]  Theodore Caplow,et al.  Neighborhood Interaction in a Homogeneous Community , 1950 .

[50]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .