Exploring Host-Binding Machineries of Mycobacteriophages with AlphaFold2

Mycobacteria include both saprophytes, such as the model system Mycobacterium smegmatis, and pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium abscessus, that are poorly responsive to antibiotic treatments and pose a global public health problem. Mycobacteriophages have been collected at a very large scale over the last decade, and they have proven to be valuable tools for mycobacteria genetic manipulation, rapid diagnostics, and infection treatment. ABSTRACT Although more than 12,000 bacteriophages infecting mycobacteria (mycobacteriophages) have been isolated so far, there is a knowledge gap on their structure-function relationships. Here, we have explored the architecture of host-binding machineries from seven representative mycobacteriophages of the Siphoviridae family infecting Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium abscessus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, using AlphaFold2 (AF2). AF2 enables confident structural analyses of large and flexible biological assemblies resistant to experimental methods, thereby opening new avenues to shed light on phage structure and function. Our results highlight the modularity and structural diversity of siphophage host-binding machineries that recognize host-specific receptors at the onset of viral infection. Interestingly, the studied mycobacteriophages’ host-binding machineries present unique features compared with those of phages infecting other Gram-positive actinobacteria. Although they all assemble the classical Dit (distal tail), Tal (tail-associated lysin), and receptor-binding proteins, five of them contain two potential additional adhesion proteins. Moreover, we have identified brush-like domains formed of multiple polyglycine helices which expose hydrophobic residues as potential receptor-binding domains. These polyglycine-rich domains, which have been observed in only five native proteins, may be a hallmark of mycobacteriophages’ host-binding machineries, and they may be more common in nature than expected. Altogether, the unique composition of mycobacteriophages’ host-binding machineries indicate they might have evolved to bind to the peculiar mycobacterial cell envelope, which is rich in polysaccharides and mycolic acids. This work provides a rational framework to efficiently produce recombinant proteins or protein domains and test their host-binding function and, hence, to shed light on molecular mechanisms used by mycobacteriophages to infect their host. IMPORTANCE Mycobacteria include both saprophytes, such as the model system Mycobacterium smegmatis, and pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium abscessus, that are poorly responsive to antibiotic treatments and pose a global public health problem. Mycobacteriophages have been collected at a very large scale over the last decade, and they have proven to be valuable tools for mycobacteria genetic manipulation, rapid diagnostics, and infection treatment. Yet, molecular mechanisms used by mycobacteriophages to infect their host remain poorly understood. Therefore, exploring the structural diversity of mycobacteriophages’ host-binding machineries is important not only to better understand viral diversity and bacteriophage-host interactions, but also to rationally develop biotechnological tools. With the powerful protein structure prediction software AlphaFold2, which was publicly released a year ago, it is now possible to gain structural and functional insights on such challenging assemblies.

[1]  J. Esteban,et al.  Alternatives to Antibiotics against Mycobacterium abscessus , 2022, Antibiotics.

[2]  C. Cambillau,et al.  A structural discovery journey of streptococcal phages adhesion devices by AlphaFold2 , 2022, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[3]  T. Dokland,et al.  Structure and host specificity of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteriophage Andhra , 2022, bioRxiv.

[4]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Present Impact of AlphaFold2 Revolution on Structural Biology, and an Illustration With the Structure Prediction of the Bacteriophage J-1 Host Adhesion Device , 2022, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[5]  C. Benson,et al.  Bacteriophage treatment of disseminated cutaneous Mycobacterium chelonae infection , 2022, Nature Communications.

[6]  Jerry M. Parks,et al.  AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning , 2022, Nature Communications.

[7]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer , 2021, bioRxiv.

[8]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Structure and Topology Prediction of Phage Adhesion Devices Using AlphaFold2: The Case of Two Oenococcus oeni Phages , 2021, Microorganisms.

[9]  Douglas E. V. Pires,et al.  A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.

[11]  G. Hatfull Actinobacteriophages: Genomics, Dynamics, and Applications. , 2020, Annual review of virology.

[12]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers , 2020, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  G. Schoehn,et al.  Structure, function and assembly of the long, flexible tail of siphophages. , 2020, Current opinion in virology.

[14]  D. Hrebík,et al.  Structure and mechanism of DNA delivery of a gene transfer agent , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Revisiting the host adhesion determinants of Streptococcus thermophilus siphophages , 2020, Microbial biotechnology.

[16]  D. Minnikin,et al.  The thick waxy coat of mycobacteria, a protective layer against antibiotics and the host's immune system , 2020, The Biochemical journal.

[17]  R. Berisio,et al.  Structural and Functional Studies of a Klebsiella Phage Capsule Depolymerase Tailspike: Mechanistic Insights into Capsular Degradation. , 2020, Structure.

[18]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Conserved and Diverse Traits of Adhesion Devices from Siphoviridae Recognizing Proteinaceous or Saccharidic Receptors , 2020, Viruses.

[19]  Liisa Holm,et al.  Using Dali for Protein Structure Comparison. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.

[20]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Reprogramming Bacteriophage Host Range through Structure-Guided Design of Chimeric Receptor Binding Proteins. , 2019, Cell reports.

[21]  T. Dokland,et al.  Structure of the host cell recognition and penetration machinery of a Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage , 2019, bioRxiv.

[22]  M. Daffé,et al.  Unraveling the Structure of the Mycobacterial Envelope. , 2019, Microbiology spectrum.

[23]  R. Vincentelli,et al.  Ubiquitous Carbohydrate Binding Modules Decorate 936 Lactococcal Siphophage Virions , 2019, Viruses.

[24]  R. Schooley,et al.  Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug resistant Mycobacterium abscessus , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[25]  C. Hill,et al.  Bacteriophages of the Human Gut: The "Known Unknown" of the Microbiome. , 2019, Cell host & microbe.

[26]  T. Arndt Crystal , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[27]  P. Leiman,et al.  Salmonella Phage S16 Tail Fiber Adhesin Features a Rare Polyglycine Rich Domain for Host Recognition. , 2018, Structure.

[28]  R. Vincentelli,et al.  Functional carbohydrate binding modules identified in evolved dits from siphophages infecting various Gram‐positive bacteria , 2018, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  Mario Hupfeld,et al.  Molecular Basis of Bacterial Host Interactions by Gram-Positive Targeting Bacteriophages , 2018, Viruses.

[30]  Aldert L. Zomer,et al.  A Decade of Streptococcus thermophilus Phage Evolution in an Irish Dairy Plant , 2018, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  Lukas Zimmermann,et al.  A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Steven G. Cresawn,et al.  An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC): Impact of the SEA-PHAGES program on research outcomes and student learning , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  J. Heider,et al.  A rare polyglycine type II‐like helix motif in naturally occurring proteins , 2017, Proteins.

[34]  O. Burlet-Schiltz,et al.  Dissecting the mycobacterial cell envelope and defining the composition of the native mycomembrane , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[35]  J. W. Peters,et al.  Structural Basis for the Mechanism of ATP-Dependent Acetone Carboxylation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[36]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Evolved distal tail carbohydrate binding modules of Lactobacillus phage J‐1: a novel type of anti‐receptor widespread among lactic acid bacteria phages , 2017, Molecular microbiology.

[37]  Graham F. Hatfull,et al.  PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database , 2017, Bioinform..

[38]  J. Heider,et al.  Structure of the acetophenone carboxylase core complex: prototype of a new class of ATP-dependent carboxylases/hydrolases , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Dominic Sauvageau,et al.  Host receptors for bacteriophage adsorption. , 2016, FEMS microbiology letters.

[40]  A. Desmyter,et al.  The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules , 2016, mBio.

[41]  J. Otero,et al.  Structure of the Receptor-Binding Carboxy-Terminal Domain of the Bacteriophage T5 L-Shaped Tail Fibre with and without Its Intra-Molecular Chaperone , 2015, Viruses.

[42]  G. V. van Wezel,et al.  Taxonomy, Physiology, and Natural Products of Actinobacteria , 2015, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[43]  M. Loessner,et al.  Receptor binding proteins of Listeria monocytogenes bacteriophages A118 and P35 recognize serovar-specific teichoic acids. , 2015, Virology.

[44]  Yang Zhang,et al.  The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction , 2014, Nature Methods.

[45]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Differences in Lactococcal Cell Wall Polysaccharide Structure Are Major Determining Factors in Bacteriophage Sensitivity , 2014, mBio.

[46]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Molecular Insights on the Recognition of a Lactococcus lactis Cell Wall Pellicle by the Phage 1358 Receptor Binding Protein , 2014, Journal of Virology.

[47]  Pedro M. Coutinho,et al.  The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013 , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[48]  M. van Heel,et al.  Structure, Adsorption to Host, and Infection Mechanism of Virulent Lactococcal Phage p2 , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[49]  Sarika Mehra,et al.  Comparative Phylogenomics of Pathogenic and Non-Pathogenic Mycobacterium , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  M. Drancourt,et al.  The First Structure of a Mycobacteriophage, the Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii Phage Araucaria , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[51]  Roger Marti,et al.  Long tail fibres of the novel broad‐host‐range T‐even bacteriophage S16 specifically recognize Salmonella OmpC , 2013, Molecular microbiology.

[52]  H. Neve,et al.  The Lactococcal Phages Tuc2009 and TP901-1 Incorporate Two Alternate Forms of Their Tail Fiber into Their Virions for Infection Specialization* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  Charles A. Bowman,et al.  On the nature of mycobacteriophage diversity and host preference. , 2012, Virology.

[54]  B. Henrissat,et al.  How nature can exploit nonspecific catalytic and carbohydrate binding modules to create enzymatic specificity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  D. Veesler,et al.  Structure of the phage TP901-1 1.8 MDa baseplate suggests an alternative host adhesion mechanism , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  H. Krisch,et al.  The gp38 Adhesins of the T4 Superfamily: A Complex Modular Determinant of the Phage’s Host Specificity , 2011, Genome biology and evolution.

[57]  J. Rubinstein,et al.  Phages have adapted the same protein fold to fulfill multiple functions in virion assembly , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  G. Sciara,et al.  Structure of lactococcal phage p2 baseplate and its mechanism of activation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  A. Imberty,et al.  A TNF-like trimeric lectin domain from Burkholderia cenocepacia with specificity for fucosylated human histo-blood group antigens. , 2010, Structure.

[60]  G. Besra,et al.  Defects in glycopeptidolipid biosynthesis confer phage I3 resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. , 2009, Microbiology.

[61]  A. Davidson,et al.  The phage λ major tail protein structure reveals a common evolution for long-tailed phages and the type VI bacterial secretion system , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Brandi L. Cantarel,et al.  The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[63]  Anthony A Kossiakoff,et al.  X-ray structure of snow flea antifreeze protein determined by racemic crystallization of synthetic protein enantiomers. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[64]  D. Bolam,et al.  Family 6 Carbohydrate Binding Modules in β-Agarases Display Exquisite Selectivity for the Non-reducing Termini of Agarose Chains* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  J. Lepault,et al.  The Ectodomain of the Viral Receptor YueB Forms a Fiber That Triggers Ejection of Bacteriophage SPP1 DNA* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  C. Lima,et al.  Structural and biochemical analysis of the Obg GTP binding protein. , 2002, Structure.

[67]  Fumio Arisaka,et al.  Structure of the cell-puncturing device of bacteriophage T4 , 2002, Nature.

[68]  V. Villeret,et al.  Crystal structure of a D-aminopeptidase from Ochrobactrum anthropi, a new member of the 'penicillin-recognizing enzyme' family. , 2000, Structure.

[69]  A. Frasch,et al.  Structural basis of sialyltransferase activity in trypanosomal sialidases , 2000 .

[70]  G. Sarkis,et al.  L5 luciferase reporter mycobacteriophages: a sensitive tool for the detection and assay of live mycobacteria , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[71]  S. Steinbacher,et al.  Crystal structure of P22 tailspike protein: interdigitated subunits in a thermostable trimer. , 1994, Science.

[72]  G. Sarkis,et al.  DNA sequence, structure and gene expression of mycobacteriophage L5: a phage system for mycobacterial genetics , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[73]  M. Eschbach,et al.  Receptor specificity of the Escherichia coli T-even type phage Ox2. Mutational alterations in host range mutants. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  T. Tokunaga,et al.  Nature of the Receptor Substance of Mycobacterium smegmatis for D4 Bacteriophage Adsorption , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[75]  T. Imaeda,et al.  Adsorption of Mycobacteriophage on Cell-wall Components , 1969 .