Representing multiple object weights: competing priors and sensorimotor memories.

When lifting an object, individuals scale lifting forces based on long-term priors relating external object properties (such as material and size) to object weight. When experiencing objects that are poorly predicted by priors, people rapidly form and update sensorimotor memories that can be used to predict an object's atypical size-weight relation in support of predictively scaling lift forces. With extensive experience in lifting such objects, long-term priors, assessed with weight judgments, are gradually updated. The aim of the present study was to understand the formation and updating of these memory processes. Participants lifted, over multiple days, a set of black cubes with a normal size-weight mapping and green cubes with an inverse size-weight mapping. Sensorimotor memory was assessed with lifting forces, and priors associated with the black and green cubes were assessed with the size-weight illusion (SWI). Interference was observed in terms of adaptation of the SWI, indicating that priors were not independently adjusted. Half of the participants rapidly learned to scale lift forces appropriately, whereas reduced learning was observed in the others, suggesting that individual differences may be affecting sensorimotor memory abilities. A follow-up experiment showed that lifting forces are not accurately scaled to objects when concurrently performing a visuomotor association task, suggesting that sensorimotor memory formation involves cognitive resources to instantiate the mapping between object identity and weight, potentially explaining the results of experiment 1 These results provide novel insight into the formation and updating of sensorimotor memories and provide support for the independent adjustment of sensorimotor memory and priors.

[1]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Théodore Flournoy,et al.  Illusions de poids , 1894 .

[3]  H. Forssberg,et al.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[5]  Carl J. Warden,et al.  The Effect of Color on Apparent Size and Weight , 1926 .

[6]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Goodale,et al.  The material–weight illusion induced by expectations alone , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  K. J. Cole Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[12]  Stephen P. Harshfield,et al.  Weight judgment as a function of apparent density of objects , 1970 .

[13]  E. Langer,et al.  When practice makes imperfect: debilitating effects of overlearning. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Walker,et al.  The brightness-weight illusion. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[16]  H. C. Warren De l'influence de la perception visuelle des corps sur leur poids apparent. , 1896 .

[17]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  H. Ross When is a Weight not Illusory? , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Maurice A Smith,et al.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  D. Westwood,et al.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Size Matters: A Single Representation Underlies Our Perceptions of Heaviness in the Size-Weight Illusion , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  D. Camp The influence of color on apparent weight. A preliminary study. , 1917 .

[26]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Old age impairs the use of arbitrary visual cues for predictive control of fingertip forces during grasp , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  A. Charpentier Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception , 1891 .

[28]  R. Johansson,et al.  Experience Can Change Distinct Size-Weight Priors Engaged in Lifting Objects and Judging their Weights , 2008, Current Biology.

[29]  Morten Meilgaard,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .