Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.

Thresholds and their relevance to conservation have become a major topic of discussion in the ecological literature. Unfortunately, in many cases the lack of a clear conceptual framework for thinking about thresholds may have led to confusion in attempts to apply the concept of thresholds to conservation decisions. Here, we advocate a framework for thinking about thresholds in terms of a structured decision making process. The purpose of this framework is to promote a logical and transparent process for making informed decisions for conservation. Specification of such a framework leads naturally to consideration of definitions and roles of different kinds of thresholds in the process. We distinguish among three categories of thresholds. Ecological thresholds are values of system state variables at which small changes bring about substantial changes in system dynamics. Utility thresholds are components of management objectives (determined by human values) and are values of state or performance variables at which small changes yield substantial changes in the value of the management outcome. Decision thresholds are values of system state variables at which small changes prompt changes in management actions in order to reach specified management objectives. The approach that we present focuses directly on the objectives of management, with an aim to providing decisions that are optimal with respect to those objectives. This approach clearly distinguishes the components of the decision process that are inherently subjective (management objectives, potential management actions) from those that are more objective (system models, estimates of system state). Optimization based on these components then leads to decision matrices specifying optimal actions to be taken at various values of system state variables. Values of state variables separating different actions in such matrices are viewed as decision thresholds. Utility thresholds are included in the objectives component, and ecological thresholds may be embedded in models projecting consequences of management actions. Decision thresholds are determined by the above-listed components of a structured decision process. These components may themselves vary over time, inducing variation in the decision thresholds inherited from them. These dynamic decision thresholds can then be determined using adaptive management. We provide numerical examples (that are based on patch occupancy models) of structured decision processes that include all three kinds of thresholds.

[1]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[2]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Paul L. Fackler,et al.  Applied Computational Economics and Finance , 2002 .

[4]  L. Fahrig How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[5]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish , 2005 .

[6]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[8]  Tim G. Benton,et al.  Understanding the ecology of extinction: are we close to the critical threshold? , 2003 .

[9]  Mercedes Pascual,et al.  Criticality and disturbance in spatial ecological systems. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Christopher J. Fonnesbeck,et al.  SOLVING DYNAMIC WILDLIFE RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING , 2005 .

[11]  Patrick J. Sullivan,et al.  Overcompensatory response of a smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) population to harvest: release from competition? , 2008 .

[12]  James H. Brown,et al.  Reorganization of an arid ecosystem in response to recent climate change. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Systems identification and the adaptive management of waterfowl in the United States , 2001, Wildlife Biology.

[14]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Thresholds: The Key to Successful Environmental Management or an Important Concept with No Practical Application? , 2006, Ecosystems.

[15]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[16]  H. Possingham,et al.  Active Adaptive Management for Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[18]  C. T. Moore,et al.  Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests , 1997 .

[19]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds , 2004 .

[20]  B. Bestelmeyer Threshold Concepts and Their Use in Rangeland Management and Restoration: The Good, the Bad, and the Insidious , 2006 .

[21]  Michael D. Intriligator,et al.  Mathematical optimization and economic theory , 1971 .

[22]  Fred A. Johnson,et al.  BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND DECISION THEORY—A FRAMEWORK FOR DECISION MAKING IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[23]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Estimation of temporal variability of survival in animal populations , 1998 .

[24]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology , 2000 .

[25]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[26]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[27]  B. Wiman,et al.  The usefulness of stability concepts in forest management when coping with increasing climate uncertainties , 2007 .

[28]  A. Huggett The concept and utility of ecological thresholds in biodiversity conservation , 2005 .

[29]  B K Williams,et al.  Adaptive optimization and the harvest of biological populations. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[30]  John E. Gross,et al.  Linking Monitoring to Management and Planning: Assessment Points as a Generalized Approach , 2007 .

[31]  L. Gunderson Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[32]  F. Johnson,et al.  Uncertainty and the Adaptive Management of Waterfowl Harvests , 1996 .

[33]  Craig R. Allen,et al.  Landscape Change in the Southern Piedmont: Challenges, Solutions, and Uncertainty Across Scales , 2003 .

[34]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management: Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management , 2002 .

[35]  R. Bellman Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[36]  M. Burgman Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[37]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  Evaluation of some random effects methodology applicable to bird ringing data , 2002 .