Driving the electric bandwagon: The dynamics of incumbents' sustainable innovation

Given that entire industries face sustainability challenges, it is important to understand the dynamics that lead “firms‐in‐an‐industry” to engage in sustainable product innovation. To provide more insight into the question of how innovation activities spread from individual firm action to an industry‐wide engagement, this paper examines the automobile industry and the development of electric vehicles (EVs). The analysis covers automobile incumbents over a crucial decade for EV development in the industry, focusing on the different strategic motives that especially the so‐called “first movers” used to justify their earlier engagement. We find that EVs became a core pillar of the incumbents' technology strategies through a combination of coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures. Yet, the strategic motives to engage in EVs stayed poles apart between different companies. The insights from our study are relevant for those interested in the diffusion of sustainable product innovation and in incumbent behaviour in sustainability transitions.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[2]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[3]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Editorial February 2018 Issue , 2018, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[5]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Business strategies of incumbents in the market for electric vehicles: opportunities and incentives for sustainable innovation , 2015 .

[6]  Yu‐Shan Chen.  The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence , 2008 .

[7]  A. Kolk,et al.  Business Models for Sustainable Technologies: Exploring Business Model Evolution in the Case of Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[8]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[9]  Jill M. Purdy,et al.  Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields , 2009 .

[10]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Innovation and Recurring Shifts in Industrial Leadership: Three Phases of Change and Persistence in the Camera Industry , 2017 .

[11]  D. Pujari,et al.  Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability , 2010 .

[12]  A. Kolk,et al.  Co-Evolution in Relation to Small Cars and Sustainability in China , 2014 .

[13]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  Firms’ Response to Climate Change: The Interplay of Business Uncertainty and Organizational Capabilities , 2016 .

[14]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[15]  S. Hultén,et al.  Escaping lock-in: The case of the electric vehicle☆ , 1996 .

[16]  Marlen Arnold,et al.  The greening dutchman: Philips' process of green flagging to drive sustainable innovations , 2010 .

[17]  René Bohnsack,et al.  The Role of Public and Private Protection in Disruptive Innovation: The Automotive Industry and the Emergence of Low‐Emission Vehicles , 2014 .

[18]  Thomas Budde Christensen,et al.  Can innovative business models overcome resistance to electric vehicles?: Better Place and battery electric cars in Denmark , 2012 .

[19]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies , 2015 .

[20]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Does Isomorphism Legitimate? , 1996 .

[21]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .

[22]  F. Geels.  Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework , 2014 .

[23]  A. Kolk.  Trajectories of Sustainability Reporting by MNCs , 2009 .

[24]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework , 1998 .

[25]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: Implications for sustainability , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[26]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[27]  Friedrich Grosse-Dunker,et al.  Sustainbility Innovation Cube , 2009 .

[28]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? , 2002 .

[29]  T. Hahn,et al.  Private Environmental Governance Through Cross-Sector Partnerships , 2014 .

[30]  Frederick T. Knickerbocker.  Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise , 1973 .

[31]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[32]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Strategic collective system building to commercialize sustainability innovations , 2016 .

[33]  René Bohnsack,et al.  Value Propositions for Disruptive Technologies: Reconfiguration Tactics in the Case of Electric Vehicles , 2017 .

[34]  Maryse M. H. Chappin,et al.  Coping with coopetition — Facing dilemmas in cooperation for sustainable development: The case of the Dutch smart grid industry , 2019, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[35]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Responsiveness of industry to eco-efficiency improvements in the product chain: the case of Akzo Nobel1 , 1998 .

[36]  G. Kramer,et al.  A multi-level perspective on the introduction of hydrogen and battery-electric vehicles , 2010 .

[37]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan , 2006 .

[38]  Martin Müller,et al.  Drivers, Practices and Outcomes of Low-carbon Operations: Approaches of German Automotive Suppliers to Cutting Carbon Emissions , 2015 .

[39]  Sjoerd Bakker,et al.  Competition in a technological niche: the cars of the future , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[40]  J. Romm.  The car and fuel of the future , 2006 .

[41]  Merle Jacob,et al.  Past, Present, or Future? Managers’ Temporal Orientations and Corporate Climate Action in the Swedish Electricity Sector , 2014 .

[42]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs) : a patent data analysis. , 2006 .

[43]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective , 2017 .

[44]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[45]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids -- Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[46]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  Cross-National Complementarity of Technology Push, Demand Pull, and Manufacturing Push Policies: The Case of Photovoltaics , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[47]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[48]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Sense Through Thinking and Acting , 2006 .

[49]  B. Gray,et al.  Bargaining Power, Management Control, and Performance in United States-China Joint Ventures: A Compa , 1994 .

[50]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility , 1992 .

[51]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[52]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions , 2017 .

[53]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter? , 2012 .

[54]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[55]  Steven Sarasini,et al.  Conceptualizing Industry Efforts to Eco-innovate Among Large Swedish Companies , 2014 .

[56]  Encarna Guillamón-Saorín,et al.  Do Non-socially Responsible Companies Achieve Legitimacy Through Socially Responsible Actions? The Mediating Effect of Innovation , 2013 .

[57]  A. Kolk,et al.  Catching Recurring Waves: Low-Emission Vehicles, International Policy Developments and Firm Innovation Strategies , 2015 .

[58]  David Dallinger,et al.  New business models for electric cars: A holistic approach , 2011 .

[59]  Cathy L. Hartman,et al.  Avoiding Green Marketing Myopia: Ways to Improve Consumer Appeal for Environmentally Preferable Products , 2006 .

[60]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .