Occupants’ thermal comfort: State of the art and the prospects of personalized assessment in office buildings

Abstract The last decade is marked by an exponential growth of the research interest in comfort assessment in office buildings. The extensive interest can be linked with the appreciation of the impact of comfort on health, well-being and productivity, but also with the establishment of a series of European Directives and international and European Standards, aiming at the improvement of the buildings’ energy and environmental performance, without decreasing the occupants’ comfort. This interrelation is not new, as a variety of models have been established over the years aiming to determine the parameters that affect comfort and its subcategories. Since 1970 and Fanger’s model, a series of methodological approaches are implemented and models have been established. Still, the call for nearly Zero Energy Buildings sets tight restrictions to comfort parameters, whilst on the other hand knowledge gained and new technologies in Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) allow for a much more analytical determination of conditions. It is within this line of approach that during the last decade a great portion of work has been published based on comfort in office buildings, evaluating the occupants’ perspective. The most popular methodological approach presupposes the gathering of both qualitative and quantitative findings, making the identification of both personal and environmental characteristics possible. This paper aims to monitor and discuss the evolution of methodological approaches regarding the determination of comfort. The methodological approach is based on the analysis of published literature and on the funding of dedicated research projects, in order to highlight the research focus over the last decade. As demonstrated from the research, the need of working towards personalized assessment of comfort, putting the occupants’ perspective in the epicenter and highlighting the key issues that have still to be tackled in that direction, is an innovative approach that needs further analysis.

[1]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of Thermal Sensation in Office Buildings: A Case Study in the Mediterranean , 2017 .

[2]  L. Berglund,et al.  A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment , 1986 .

[3]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments: Part III: whole-body sensation and comfort , 2009 .

[4]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  Experimental study of the thermal performance of a large institutional building with mixed-mode cooling and hybrid ventilation , 2012 .

[5]  Ralph F. Goldman,et al.  Extrapolating ASHRAE's Comfort Model , 1999 .

[6]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process , 2001 .

[7]  Joseph Virgone,et al.  In-situ study of thermal comfort enhancement in a renovated building equipped with phase change material wallboard , 2011 .

[8]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Forty years of regulations on the thermal performance of the building envelope in Europe: Achievements, perspectives and challenges , 2016 .

[9]  Edward Arens,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality ( IEQ ) Title A model of human physiology and comfort for assessing complex thermal environments , 2001 .

[10]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Adaptive model of thermal comfort for offices in hot and humid climates of India , 2014 .

[11]  Brm Boris Kingma Human thermoregulation; A synergy between physiology and mathematical modeling , 2012 .

[12]  Jyotirmay Mathur,et al.  Thermal comfort assessment and characteristics of occupant's behaviour in naturally ventilated buildings in composite climate of India , 2016 .

[13]  Scott Kelly,et al.  Do homes that are more energy efficient consume less energy?: A structural equation model of the English residential sector , 2011 .

[14]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Combining revealed and stated preferences data , 1994 .

[15]  Roberto Lamberts,et al.  A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment , 2015 .

[16]  Lusi Morhayim,et al.  Survey of an office and laboratory university building - An unhealthy building case study , 2008 .

[17]  K. Pavlou,et al.  Recent progress on passive cooling techniques: Advanced technological developments to improve survivability levels in low-income households , 2007 .

[18]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  Energy and investment intensity of integrated renovation and 2030 cost optimal savings , 2014 .

[19]  Jianlei Niu,et al.  Thermal comfort models: A review and numerical investigation , 2012 .

[20]  Jan A. J. Stolwijk,et al.  A mathematical model of physiological temperature regulation in man , 1971 .

[21]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office , 1998 .

[22]  Ergo Pikas,et al.  Cost optimal and nearly zero energy building solutions for office buildings , 2014 .

[23]  James P. Cowan Handbook of Environmental Acoustics , 1993 .

[24]  B. W. Jones,et al.  710 A TRANSIENT, THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF THE HUMAN THERMAL SYSTEM , 1991 .

[25]  Rumiati R. Tobing,et al.  Study on the Relationship between Aspects, Orientation,Type, and Unit Position toward to Indoor Air Quality in Flat , 2013 .

[26]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  An online learning approach for quantifying personalized thermal comfort via adaptive stochastic modeling , 2015 .

[27]  Gian Marco Revel,et al.  Cost-effective technologies to control indoor air quality and comfort in energy efficient building retrofitting , 2015 .

[28]  Yi Wang,et al.  Comparative analysis of modified PMV models and SET models to predict human thermal sensation in naturally ventilated buildings , 2015 .

[29]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  Occupant interactions with shading and lighting systems using different control interfaces: A pilot field study , 2016 .

[30]  M Bullinger,et al.  Eye- and skin symptoms in German office workers--subjective perception vs. objective medical screening. , 2001, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[31]  Chen Jia Woon,et al.  Occupants’ satisfaction toward building environmental quality: structural equation modeling approach , 2015, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[32]  A. P. Gagge,et al.  THE LINEARITY CRITERION AS APPLIED TO PARTITIONAL CALORIMETRY , 1936 .

[33]  J. E. Janssen,et al.  Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality , 1989 .

[34]  E. González,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated spaces and under indirect evaporative passive cooling conditions in hot–humid climate , 2013 .

[35]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Comparison of thermal comfort and sensation scales : a case study , 2015 .

[36]  P. Samuelson A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour , 1938 .

[37]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[38]  A. P. Gagge,et al.  An Effective Temperature Scale Based on a Simple Model of Human Physiological Regulatiry Response , 1972 .

[39]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe , 2002 .

[40]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Development of the adaptive PMV model for improving prediction performances , 2015 .

[41]  Susumu Iai,et al.  International standard (ISO) on seismic actions for designing geotechnical works : An overview , 2005 .

[42]  Tetsumi Horikoshi,et al.  New comfort index during combined conditions of moderate low ambient temperature and traffic noise , 2005 .

[43]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[44]  Gillian Isoardi,et al.  Post occupancy evaluations relating to discomfort glare : a study of green buildings in Brisbane , 2013 .

[45]  John G. Bartzis,et al.  Perceived Indoor Environment and Occupants’ Comfort in European “Modern” Office Buildings: The OFFICAIR Study , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[46]  Jin Wen,et al.  Modeling thermal comfort holistically: Bayesian estimation of thermal sensation, acceptability, and preference distributions for office building occupants , 2013 .

[47]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Thermal comfort in offices in summer: Findings from a field study under the ‘setsuden’ conditions in Tokyo, Japan , 2013 .

[48]  Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin,et al.  Acoustic, thermal and luminous comfort in classrooms , 2004 .

[49]  M. N. Fisch,et al.  Spot Monitoring: Thermal comfort evaluation in 25 office buildings in winter , 2009 .

[50]  Ian Cooper,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation - where are you? , 2001 .

[51]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Experimental investigation of thermal and ventilation performances of stratum ventilation , 2011 .

[52]  Cinzia Buratti,et al.  Thermal comfort in open plan offices in northern Italy: An adaptive approach , 2012 .

[53]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction , 2012 .

[54]  Jürgen Schnieders,et al.  CEPHEUS - measurement results from more than 100 dwelling units in passive houses , 2003 .

[55]  B. Jones Transient interaction between the human and the thermal environment , 1992 .

[56]  H. Rijal,et al.  Thermal comfort in offices in India: Behavioral adaptation and the effect of age and gender , 2015 .

[57]  Y Zhu,et al.  Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. , 2013, Indoor air.

[58]  C Mandin,et al.  Self-reported health and comfort in 'modern' office buildings: first results from the European OFFICAIR study. , 2016, Indoor air.

[59]  Y. Davara,et al.  Architectural Design and IEQ In An Office Complex On Research, Politics and Their Dynamics , 2006 .

[60]  Liu Yang,et al.  Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications - A review , 2014 .

[61]  Sheikh Ahmad Zaki,et al.  Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Japan during hot and humid season , 2016 .

[62]  Philomena M. Bluyssen,et al.  Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project , 2010 .

[63]  C. Dimitroulopoulou,et al.  The HOPE Project: The UK Experience , 2006 .

[64]  Edward Arens,et al.  Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments: Part I: local sensation of individual body parts , 2009 .

[65]  R. F. Goldman,et al.  Predicting metabolic energy cost. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[66]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[67]  S. Tanabe,et al.  Evaluation of thermal comfort using combined multi-node thermoregulation (65MN) and radiation models and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) , 2002 .

[68]  Michael Pitt,et al.  Assessing post occupancy evaluation in higher education facilities , 2010 .

[69]  V. Candas,et al.  Effects of steady-state noise and temperature conditions on environmental perception and acceptability. , 2004, Indoor air.

[70]  Joon-Ho Choi,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines , 2012 .

[71]  Tong Yang,et al.  Exchange of simulation data between CFD programmes and a multisegmented human thermal comfort model , 2008 .

[72]  Yuguo Li,et al.  Human thermal sensation and comfort in a non-uniform environment with personalized heating. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  Takashi Akimoto,et al.  Thermal comfort and productivity - Evaluation of workplace environment in a task conditioned office , 2010 .

[74]  Matti Jantunen,et al.  Promoting actions for healthy indoor air (IAIAQ) , 2011 .

[75]  P. Wargocki,et al.  Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments , 2011 .

[76]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 4: the Probe occupant surveys and their implications , 2001 .

[77]  Erik Johansson,et al.  Instruments and methods in outdoor thermal comfort studies – The need for standardization , 2014 .

[78]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Evaluation of Green Buildings’ Overall Performance through in Situ Monitoring and Simulations , 2013 .

[79]  Mei Zhang,et al.  Impact of noise on self-rated job satisfaction and health in open-plan offices: a structural equation modelling approach , 2016, Ergonomics.

[80]  Jing Liu,et al.  An investigation of thermal comfort adaptation behaviour in office buildings in the UK , 2014 .

[81]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  Thermo-specific self-efficacy (specSE) in relation to perceived comfort and control , 2016 .

[82]  M. Santamouris,et al.  Using advanced cool materials in the urban built environment to mitigate heat islands and improve thermal comfort conditions , 2011 .

[83]  A. C. Burton,et al.  A STUDY OF THE AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF THE TISSUES, OF THE EXCHANGES OF HEAT AND VASOMOTOR RESPONSES IN MAN BY MEANS OF A BATH CALORIMETER , 1936 .

[84]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction—Results of field studies in German low energy office buildings , 2007 .

[85]  Dingxin Wu,et al.  Comparison of the Efficiency of Building Hybrid Ventilation Systems with Different Thermal Comfort Models , 2015 .

[86]  F. Duffy,et al.  Architectural Knowledge: The Idea of a Profession , 1998 .

[87]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[88]  Denise A. Guerin,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality of Classrooms and Student Outcomes: A Path Analysis Approach , 2014 .

[89]  Kristian Fabbri,et al.  Thermal comfort evaluation in kindergarten: PMV and PPD measurement through datalogger and questionnaire , 2013 .

[90]  Edward Arens,et al.  Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part IV: Adaptive neutral setpoints and smoothed whole-body sensation model , 2014 .

[91]  P. Wargocki,et al.  Questionnaire survey on factors influencing comfort with indoor environmental quality in Danish housing , 2012 .

[92]  Martin Tenpierik,et al.  A review into thermal comfort in buildings , 2013 .

[93]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Post-occupancy Evaluation and Thermal Comfort: State of the Art and New Approaches , 2007 .

[94]  Ruey Lung Hwang,et al.  Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings , 2012 .

[95]  Andreas H. Hermelink,et al.  CEPHEUS results : measurements and occupants' satisfaction provide evidence for Passive Houses being an option for sustainable building , 2006 .

[96]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .