The hierarchical continuum concept

Two general models have been proposed to explain the structure of the plant community: the community-unit model of Clements and the continuum model of Whittaker and Curtis, the latter based on Gleason's individualistic distribu- tion of species. It is generally assumed that most ecologists now accept the continuum model. Empirical evidence sug- gests, however, that the continuum in its current form does not fully describe the observed patterns of vegetation along envi- ronmental gradients. In this paper, we introduce the hierarchi- cal continuum as a general concept to represent dynamic community structure along regional spatial gradients. The hierarchical continuum is derived from a combination of the individualistic distribution of species, hierarchical assemblage structure, and the core-satellite species hypothesis. The hierar- chical continuum concept predicts that the distribution of species across sites in a region will be polymodal, which reflects hierarchical structure, and that the distribution and abundance of species within and between sites will be spa- tially and temporally dynamic. Regional distribution of plant species in North American tallgrass prairie, southeastern flood- plain hardwood forests, northern upland hardwood forests, and boreal forests were either bimodal or polymodal as pre- dicted by the hierarchical continuum concept. Species in tallgrass prairie were spatially and temporally dynamic with an average turnover of 8-9 species per 50 m2 yr-1. In addition, the hierarchical continuum concept predicts the potential for fractal (self-similar) patterns of community structure, and provides a framework for testable hypotheses concerning spe- cies distributions along environmental gradients.

[1]  R Daubenmire,et al.  Vegetation: identification of typal communities. , 1966, Science.

[2]  R. C. Anderson,et al.  An Inverse Relationship between Dominance and Habitat Breadth of Trees in Illinois Forests , 1982 .

[3]  David H. Wright,et al.  Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance , 1991 .

[4]  T. Allen,et al.  Toward a Unified Ecology. , 1993 .

[5]  H. Gleason,et al.  The Structure and Development of the Plant Association , 1917 .

[6]  David W. Roberts,et al.  A dynamical systems perspective on vegetation theory , 1987 .

[7]  W. Westman Gaussian Analysis: Identifying Environmental Factors Influencing Bell-Shaped Species Distributions , 1980 .

[8]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecological systems and the concept of biological organization. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Samuel J. McNaughton,et al.  Dominance and the Niche in Ecological Systems , 1970 .

[10]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  Effects of scale and disturbance on rates of immigration and extinction of species in prairies , 1992 .

[11]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[12]  T. Herben,et al.  Small-scale variability as a mechanism for large-scale stability in mountain grasslands , 1993 .

[13]  Frederic E. Clements,et al.  Nature and Structure of the Climax , 1936 .

[14]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  Patch structure in tallgrass prairies: dynamics of satellite species. , 1990 .

[15]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[16]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[17]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  The Vegetation of Wisconsin , 1962 .

[18]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[19]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Evolution of Species Diversity in Land Communities , 1977 .

[20]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes , 1987, Science.

[21]  T. Allen,et al.  Toward a Unified Ecology. , 1994 .

[22]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap. , 1971, Ecology.

[23]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[24]  Eric S. Menges,et al.  Plant Strategies in Relation to Elevation and Light in Floodplain Herbs , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[25]  R. V. O'Neill,et al.  10. Perspectives in Hierarchy and Scale , 1989 .

[26]  E. Quarterman,et al.  Southern Mixed Hardwood Forest: Climax in the Southeastern Coastal Plain, U.S.A. , 1962 .

[27]  P. Keddy Shoreline Vegetation in Axe Lake, Ontario: Effects of Exposure on Zonation Patterns , 1983 .

[28]  S. P. Mclaughlin,et al.  Are floristic areas hierarchically arranged , 1992 .

[29]  T. F. H. Allen,et al.  The confusion between scale‐defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology , 1990 .

[30]  C. Bock Distribution‐Abundance Relationships of Some Arizona Landbirds: A Matter of Scale? , 1987 .

[31]  S. Itow Species turnover and diversity patterns along an evergreen broad-leaved forest coenocline , 1991 .

[32]  M. Austin,et al.  Community theory and competition in vegetation. , 1990 .

[33]  E. Maarel,et al.  The Braun-Blanquet Approach , 1978 .

[34]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[35]  F. Rahel,et al.  The Hierarchical Nature of Community Persistence: A Problem of Scale , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[36]  M. Austin,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANT COMMUNITIES ALONG A NUTRIENT GRADIENT , 1980 .

[37]  Scott L. Collins,et al.  Importance of Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Species Regional Abundance and Distribution , 1991 .

[38]  J. Wiens Population Responses to Patchy Environments , 1976 .

[39]  J. Lawton,et al.  Insect Herbivores on Bracken Do Not Support the Core-Satellite Hypothesis , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  A Consideration of Climax Theory: The Climax as a Population and Pattern , 1953 .

[41]  Bill Shipley,et al.  The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypotheses , 1987 .

[42]  S. Collins INTERACTION OF DISTURBANCES IN TALLGRASS PRAIRIE: A FIELD EXPERIMENT' , 1987 .

[43]  Relations between community theory and community analysis in vegetation science: some historical perspectives , 1987 .

[44]  W. Westman Xeric Mediterranean-type shrubland associations of Alta and Baja California and the community/continuum debate , 1985 .

[45]  S. Acker Vegetation as a component of a non-nested hierarchy: a conceptual model , 1990 .

[46]  Mike P. Austin Searching for a Model for Use in Vegetation Analysis , 1980 .

[47]  M. F. Buell,et al.  Integration, Identity and Stability in the Plant Association , 1969 .

[48]  L. Aarssen Ecological Combining Ability and Competitive Combining Ability in Plants: Toward a General Evolutionary Theory of Coexistence in Systems of Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[49]  J. Kolasa,et al.  Ecological Systems in Hierarchical Perspecitive: Breaks in Community Structure and Other Consequences , 1989 .

[50]  Explanation and prediction in vegetation science , 1989 .

[51]  H. Wolda,et al.  Fluctuations in Abundance of Tropical Insects , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[52]  James H. Brown On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[53]  David W. Roberts,et al.  Fuzzy systems vegetation theory , 1989 .

[54]  Timothy F. H. Allen,et al.  IMPLICIT SCALING IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH : ON WHEN TO MAKE STUDIES OF MICE AND MEN , 1991 .

[55]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory , 1985 .

[56]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  A Hierarchical Analysis of Species' Abundance Patterns in Grassland Vegetation , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[57]  M. Burgman The Habitat Volumes of Scarce and Ubiquitous Plants: A Test of the Model of Environmental Control , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[58]  Martin T. Sykes,et al.  Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. , 1993 .

[59]  S. A. Cain The Climax and Its Complexities , 1939 .

[60]  N. Gotelli,et al.  The Distribution and Abundance of Tallgrass Prairie Plants: A Test of the Core-Satellite Hypothesis , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[61]  P. Keddy,et al.  Intensity and Asymmetry of Competition between Plant Pairs of Different Degrees of Similarity: An Experimental Study on Two Guilds of Wetland Plants , 1991 .

[62]  J. Wilson,et al.  Positive-feedback Switches in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[63]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Range Size and Local Abundance of Some North American Songbirds: A Positive Correlation , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[64]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[65]  I. Hanski Distributional ecology of anthropochorous plants in villages surrounded by forest , 1982 .

[66]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[67]  David Tilman,et al.  Plant Traits and Resource Reduction For Five Grasses Growing on a Nitrogen Gradient , 1991 .