Political Attention in a Coalition System: Analysing Queen's Speeches in the Netherlands 1945–2007

At the beginning of each Parliamentary session, the Dutch Queen gives a speech (Troonrede) in which she presents the government's policy goals and legislative agenda for the year to come. The general assumption is that newly elected governments will use agenda-setting moments such as the Queen's speech to put new issues on the national agenda. But does this really happen? Are governmental agendas characterized by sudden shifts following elections or by continuity? After all, at least one coalition party of the previous Dutch government is also a member of the new coalition government. So how much do changes in coalition membership result in changes in policy agendas? In this paper, we study the macro-level structure of the Dutch policy agenda and link patterns of agenda-setting with the institutional context in which this agenda-setting process occurs, that is, the Dutch parliamentary democracy characterized by multi-party government. We coded all Queen's speeches between 1945 and 2007 with a topic code book, based on similar code books used in other countries. In this way, we can examine Dutch agenda-setting patterns and assess the effects of coalition composition and coalition life cycle (from the first year a newly formed government is installed to the last year it is still in office) on agenda-setting.

[1]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail , 1977 .

[2]  J. Blondel,et al.  Governing together : the extent and limits of joint decision-making in Western European cabinets , 1993 .

[3]  Maurizio Cotta,et al.  The Nature of Party Government , 2000 .

[4]  J. Keeler.  Opening the Window for Reform , 1993 .

[5]  M. Laver.  Making and breaking governments , 1996 .

[6]  Richard Rose,et al.  Do parties make a difference , 1980 .

[7]  I. Budge,et al.  Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate , 2005 .

[8]  Peter John,et al.  Policy punctuations in the UK: fluctuations and equilibria in central government expenditure since 1951 , 2003 .

[9]  I. Budge,et al.  Parties and Democracy , 1993 .

[10]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Maurizio Cotta,et al.  The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective , 2000 .

[12]  Michael Laver,et al.  Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe , 1990 .

[13]  Lawrence C. Dodd,et al.  Coalitions in Parliamentary Government , 1976 .

[14]  Nelson W. Polsby.  Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation , 1984 .

[15]  Wolfgang C. Müller,et al.  Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies , 2003 .

[16]  B. Jones.  The politics of attention , 2005 .

[17]  Richard I. Hofferbert,et al.  The Party Mandate and the Westminster Model: Election Programmes and Government Spending in Britain, 1948–85 , 1992, British Journal of Political Science.

[18]  Michael Laver,et al.  Party Policy and Government Coalitions , 1992 .

[19]  Paul V. Warwick.  Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies , 1994 .

[20]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[21]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[22]  Wolfgang C. Müller,et al.  Coalition Governments in Western Europe , 2000 .

[23]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Comparative studies of policy agendas , 2006 .

[24]  I. Budge,et al.  Elections, Parties, Democracy , 2005 .

[25]  R. Kent Weaver,et al.  Do Institutions Matter?: Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad , 1993 .

[26]  William H. Flanigan,et al.  The Theory of Political Coalitions. , 1965 .

[27]  Valerie J. Bunce.  Changing Leaders and Changing Policies: The Impact of Elite Succession on Budgetary Priorities in Democratic Countries , 1980 .