Cranial sutures and craniometric points detected on MRI

The main goal of the study was to determine on MRI the cranial sutures, the craniometric points and craniometric measurements, and to correlate these results with classical anthropometric measurements. For this purpose, we reviewed 150 cerebral MRI examinations considered as normal (Caucasian population aged 20―49 years). For each examination we individualized 11 craniometric landmarks (Glabella, Bregma, Lambda, Opisthocranion, Opisthion, Basion, Inion, Porion, Infra-orbital, Eurion) and three measurements. Measurements were also calculated independently on 498 dry crania (Microscribe 3-DX digitizer). To validate the MRI procedure, we measured four dry crania by MRI and with compass or digital caliper gauges. Cranial sutures always appeared without signal (black), whatever the MRI sequence used, and they are better visualized with a 5 mm slice thickness (compact bone overlapping). Slice dynamic analysis and multiplanar reformatting allowed the detection of all craniometric points, some of these being more difficult to detect than others (Porion, Infra-orbital). The measurements determined by these points were as follows: Vertex―Basion height=135.66±6.56 mm; Eurion―Eurion width=141.17±5.19 mm; Glabella―Opisthocranion length=181.94±6.40 mm. On the midline T1-weighted sagittal image, all median craniometric landmarks can be individualized and the Glabella―Opisthocranion length, Vertex―Basion height and parenchyma indices can be calculated. Craniometric points and measurements between these points can be estimated with a standard cerebral MRI examination, with results that are similar to anthropometric data.

[1]  J. Panchal,et al.  The Timing of Physiologic Closure of the Metopic Suture: A Review of 159 Patients Using Reconstructed 3D CT Scans of the Craniofacial Region , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery (Print).

[2]  A. Elster,et al.  Postnatal development of the central skull base: normal variants. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  R. Sokal,et al.  Cranial variation in European populations: a spatial autocorrelation study at three time periods. , 1987, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  J. Relethford,et al.  Craniometric variation among modern human populations. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  D. Norman,et al.  Computerized tomography of cranial sutures. Part 1: Comparison of suture anatomy in children and adults. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  L. Konigsberg,et al.  Skeletal biological distance studies in American physical anthropology: recent trends. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  W. Howells,et al.  Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference Among Recent Human Populations , 1975 .

[8]  N. Lynnerup,et al.  Brief communication: age and fractal dimensions of human sagittal and coronal sutures. , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  W. Howells,et al.  Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo , 1992 .

[10]  Scott P Bartlett,et al.  Metopic Synostosis: Defining the Temporal Sequence of Normal Suture Fusion and Differentiating It from Synostosis on the Basis of Computed Tomography Images , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  J. Relethford,et al.  Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human origins. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.