A new discrete dipole kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

PURPOSE Most approaches for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) are based on a forward model approximation that employs a continuous Fourier transform operator to solve a differential equation system. Such formulation, however, is prone to high-frequency aliasing. The aim of this study was to reduce such errors using an alternative dipole kernel formulation based on the discrete Fourier transform and discrete operators. METHODS The impact of such an approach on forward model calculation and susceptibility inversion was evaluated in contrast to the continuous formulation both with synthetic phantoms and in vivo MRI data. RESULTS The discrete kernel demonstrated systematically better fits to analytic field solutions, and showed less over-oscillations and aliasing artifacts while preserving low- and medium-frequency responses relative to those obtained with the continuous kernel. In the context of QSM estimation, the use of the proposed discrete kernel resulted in error reduction and increased sharpness. CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that discretizing the dipole kernel is advantageous for QSM. The impact on small or narrow structures such as the venous vasculature might by particularly relevant to high-resolution QSM applications with ultra-high field MRI - a topic for future investigations. The proposed dipole kernel has a straightforward implementation to existing QSM routines.

[1]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  In Vivo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) in Alzheimer's Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Nian Wang,et al.  Regionally progressive accumulation of iron in Parkinson's disease as measured by quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  Tian Liu,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the motor cortex in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Xue Xiao,et al.  Integrated Laplacian‐based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2014, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of white matter multiple sclerosis lesions: Interpreting positive susceptibility and the presence of iron , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Margit Jehna,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis. , 2013, Radiology.

[8]  Yi Wang,et al.  Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  Pascal Spincemaille,et al.  In vivo quantification of contrast agent concentration using the induced magnetic field for time-resolved arterial input function measurement with MRI. , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Measurement and Correction of Microscopic Head Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Bing Wu,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  ProblemsPer Christian HansenDepartment The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems , 2000 .

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[15]  Yi Wang,et al.  Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single‐angle acquisition: Comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. R. Reichenbach,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications , 2015, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[17]  E. Haacke,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  Matthew J. Betts,et al.  The whole-brain pattern of magnetic susceptibility perturbations in Parkinson’s disease , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[20]  Xuemei Huang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the midbrain in Parkinson's disease , 2016, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[21]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative s usceptibility Mapping of Multiple s clerosis lesions at Various ages 1 , 2014 .

[22]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2011, NeuroImage.

[23]  Y Wang,et al.  Lateral Asymmetry and Spatial Difference of Iron Deposition in the Substantia Nigra of Patients with Parkinson Disease Measured with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  Shuai Wang,et al.  Noise Effects in Various Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Methods , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  J. Duyn,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: Validation and application to brain imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  C. Moonen,et al.  A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility , 2003 .

[28]  Pascal Spincemaille,et al.  Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Julio Acosta-Cabronero,et al.  In Vivo MRI Mapping of Brain Iron Deposition across the Adult Lifespan , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Application of a Fourier‐based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility , 2005 .

[31]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Brain iron quantification by MRI in mitochondrial membrane protein-associated neurodegeneration under iron-chelating therapy , 2014, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[32]  Wolfgang Nolting,et al.  Quantum Theory of Magnetism , 2009 .