Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Tufte. The visual display of quantitative information , 1984, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[2] Torsten Oliver Salge,et al. Computational Literature Reviews: Method, Algorithms, and Roadmap , 2021, Organizational Research Methods.
[3] Martin R. W. Hiebl,et al. Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research , 2021, Organizational Research Methods.
[4] R. Dalal,et al. Within-Person Variability in Job Performance , 2014, The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes.
[5] Marc H. Anderson,et al. Citation Context Analysis as a Method for Conducting Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.
[6] M. Cronin,et al. The Why and How of the Integrative Review , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.
[7] M. Alvesson,et al. Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.
[8] Martha S. Feldman,et al. Moving Beyond Templates: A Bricolage Approach to Conducting Trustworthy Qualitative Research , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.
[9] M. Alvesson,et al. The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg's Argument for Integrative Reviews , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.
[10] Corinne Post,et al. Advancing Theory with Review Articles , 2020 .
[11] S. Oliver,et al. Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method , 2020, Research synthesis methods.
[12] Andrew Booth,et al. Qualitative Evidence Synthesis , 2017, SAGE Research Methods Foundations.
[13] A. Polonioli. In search of better science: on the epistemic costs of systematic reviews and the need for a pluralistic stance to literature search , 2019, Scientometrics.
[14] David W. Bates,et al. Visualizing Literature Review Theme Evolution on Timeline Maps: Comparison Across Disciplines , 2019, IEEE Access.
[15] L. Hedges,et al. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.
[16] Oliver Baumann,et al. Effective Search in Rugged Performance Landscapes: A Review and Outlook , 2018, Journal of Management.
[17] J. McKenzie,et al. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence , 2018, Systematic Reviews.
[18] Marc Gruber,et al. From the Editors—A Brief Primer on Data Visualization Opportunities in Management Research , 2018, Academy of Management Journal.
[19] Dorothy E. Leidner,et al. Review and Theory Symbiosis: An Introspective Retrospective , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[20] Laura B. Cardinal,et al. Feature Topic at Organizational Research Methods , 2018 .
[21] Trisha Greenhalgh,et al. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? , 2018, European journal of clinical investigation.
[22] A. Madden,et al. Using narrative evidence synthesis in HRM research: An overview of the method, its application, and the lessons learned , 2018 .
[23] Kimberly D. Elsbach,et al. Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research , 2018 .
[24] J. R. Turner,et al. Theoretical Literature Review: Tracing the Life Cycle of a Theory and Its Verified and Falsified Statements , 2018 .
[25] Stefan T. Mol,et al. Text Mining in Organizational Research , 2017, Organizational research methods.
[26] Stephen H. Bell,et al. A ?scoping review. , 2018, Sexual health.
[27] Yin Kia Chiam,et al. Text-Mining Techniques and Tools for Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017, 2017 24th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC).
[28] Ajai S. Gaur,et al. A systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25years of IB research , 2017 .
[29] Harvey A. Whiteford,et al. How do we define the policy impact of public health research? A systematic review , 2017, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[30] M. Vaska,et al. Review Typology: The Basic Types of Reviews for Synthesizing Evidence for the Purpose of Knowledge Translation. , 2017, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.
[31] Christian F. Durach,et al. A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management , 2017 .
[32] R. Adams,et al. Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies , 2017 .
[33] Herman Aguinis,et al. What You See is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research , 2017 .
[34] Yu Xiao,et al. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review , 2017 .
[35] R. Whittemore,et al. Top 10 Tips for Undertaking Synthesis Research. , 2017, Research in nursing & health.
[36] Mary Tate,et al. Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[37] Monika Kastner,et al. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[38] Neal R Haddaway,et al. Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[39] Mike Chiasson,et al. Avoiding methodological overdose: a declaration for independent ends , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..
[40] Guy Paré,et al. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..
[41] F. Al-Shamali,et al. Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.
[42] Thomas G. Cummings,et al. Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist Conceptualization , 2014 .
[43] Ivan Zupic,et al. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization , 2014 .
[44] Frantz Rowe,et al. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[45] Jean M. Bartunek,et al. Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike , 2014 .
[46] Ludo Waltman,et al. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks , 2014 .
[47] Andrew Booth,et al. A qualitative evidence synthesis of employees’ views of workplace smoking reduction or cessation interventions , 2013, BMC Public Health.
[48] J. Norris,et al. Research synthesis and meta‐analysis , 2012 .
[49] Rosane Minghim,et al. A visual analysis approach to validate the selection review of primary studies in systematic reviews , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[50] A. Tricco,et al. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[51] David Denyer,et al. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool , 2012 .
[52] Emilia Mendes,et al. Using Visual Text Mining to Support the Study Selection Activity in Systematic Literature Reviews , 2011, 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.
[53] Noel A. Card. Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research , 2011 .
[54] Andrew Booth,et al. A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.
[55] Kevin G. Corley,et al. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . , 2011 .
[56] Andrew Booth,et al. How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[57] Donald E. Gibson,et al. Anger in Organizations: Review and Integration , 2010 .
[58] Russell Cropanzano,et al. Writing Nonempirical Articles for Journal of Management: General Thoughts and Suggestions , 2009 .
[59] Denise M. Rousseau,et al. Evidence-Based Management: Concept Cleanup Time? , 2009 .
[60] J. Ioannidis,et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[61] A. Hillman,et al. Resource Dependence Theory: A Review , 2009 .
[62] J. Ioannidis,et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].
[63] Maria J Grant,et al. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.
[64] David Clarke,et al. Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective , 2009 .
[65] K Ann McKibbon,et al. The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[66] D. Tranfield,et al. Producing a systematic review. , 2009 .
[67] P. Hoyningen-Huene. Systematicity: The Nature of Science , 2013 .
[68] Reginald A. Litz,et al. Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us , 2008 .
[69] Jeremy C. Short,et al. The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management , 2008 .
[70] D. Rousseau,et al. Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field's Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge through Syntheses , 2008 .
[71] J. Crawford,et al. The impact of review articles , 2007, Laboratory Investigation.
[72] A. Edmondson,et al. METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .
[73] T. Judge,et al. What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal? , 2007 .
[74] K. Bowman,et al. A Research Synthesis Overview , 2007, Nursing science quarterly.
[75] Rhonda K. Reger,et al. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements , 2007 .
[76] A. Pullin,et al. Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[77] Thomas J Katz,et al. Propagation of Errors in Review Articles , 2006, Science.
[78] Donald D. Bergh,et al. Some predictors of SMJ article impact , 2006 .
[79] Trisha Greenhalgh,et al. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.
[80] H. Arksey,et al. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .
[81] M. MacLure,et al. ‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: where’s the quality in systematic review? , 2005 .
[82] D. Tranfield,et al. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .
[83] Margarete Sandelowski,et al. Classifying the Findings in Qualitative Studies , 2003, Qualitative health research.
[84] R. Baumeister,et al. Writing Narrative Literature Reviews , 1997, Review of General Psychology.
[85] Samuel B. Bacharach,et al. Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .
[86] R. Merton,et al. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1973 .
[87] R. Merton. The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .
[88] C. Brodsky. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .