Longitudinal Microperimetric Changes of Macular Sensitivity in Stargardt Disease After 12 Months: ProgStar Report No. 13.

Importance Functional end points for clinical trials investigating the efficacy of emerging treatments for Stargardt disease type 1 (STGD1) are needed. Objective To assess the yearly rate of change of macular function in patients with STGD1 using microperimetry. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in an international selection of tertiary referral centers from October 21, 2013, to February 15, 2017. The study included participants with ABCA4-related STGD1 who were enrolled in the Natural History of the Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) study at baseline. Data were analyzed from February 16, 2017, to December 1, 2019. Exposure ABCA4-related STGD1 with a minimum lesion size on fundus autofluorescence and a minimum visual acuity. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in overall macular sensitivity (MS), deep scotoma count, number of points that tested normal, and location-specific sensitivity changes. Results Among the 359 eyes from 200 patients (87 [43.5%] men; mean [SD] age, 33.3 [15.2] years) who underwent microperimetry examination graded at baseline and month 12, the mean (SD) yearly change in MS was -0.68 (2.04) dB (95% CI, -0.89 to -0.47 dB; P < .001), and deep scotoma points increased by a mean (SD) of 1.56 (5.74) points per year. The points with sensitivity of 12 dB or higher decreased in sensitivity by a mean (SD) of -3.01 (9.84) dB (95% CI, -4.03 to -1.99 dB; P < .001). The mean (SD) yearly change in MS was not significantly different between the eyes with a grading of good or fair pattern placement at both visits (-0.67 [2.1] dB) and the eyes with a poor pattern placement during at least 1 visit (-0.64 [2.2] dB) (P = .91). Conclusions and Relevance This study showed that MS and the number of deep scotoma points had measurably changed after follow-up of approximately 1 year. Microperimetry may serve as a useful functional outcome parameter for clinical trials aimed at slowing the progression of STGD1.

[1]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Faster Sensitivity Loss around Dense Scotomas than for Overall Macular Sensitivity in Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Report No. 14. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Sahel,et al.  Progression of Stargardt Disease as Determined by Fundus Autofluorescence Over a 12-Month Period: ProgStar Report No. 11. , 2019, JAMA ophthalmology.

[3]  B. Munoz,et al.  Longitudinal Changes of Fixation Location and Stability Within 12 Months in Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Report No. 12. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Visual Acuity Change Over 24 Months and Its Association With Foveal Phenotype and Genotype in Individuals With Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Study Report No. 10 , 2018, JAMA ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Sahel,et al.  Scotopic Microperimetric Assessment of Rod Function in Stargardt Disease (SMART) Study: Design and Baseline Characteristics (Report No. 1) , 2018, Ophthalmic Research.

[6]  J. Sahel,et al.  Detailed genetic characteristics of an international large cohort of patients with Stargardt disease: ProgStar study report 8 , 2018, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Progression of Stargardt Disease as Determined by Fundus Autofluorescence in the Retrospective Progression of Stargardt Disease Study (ProgStar Report No. 9) , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Sahel,et al.  Visual Acuity Change over 12 Months in the Prospective Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) Study: ProgStar Report Number 6. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[9]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Macular Sensitivity Measured With Microperimetry in Stargardt Disease in the Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) Study: Report No. 7 , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Incidence of Atrophic Lesions in Stargardt Disease in the Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) Study: Report No. 5 , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.

[11]  B. Munoz,et al.  Progression of Stargardt disease as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in the ProgStar Study , 2017 .

[12]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Progression of Visual Acuity and Fundus Autofluorescence in Recent-Onset Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Study Report #4. , 2016, Ophthalmology. Retina.

[13]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Fixation Location and Stability Using the MP-1 Microperimeter in Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Report No. 3. , 2017, Ophthalmology. Retina.

[14]  S. Vujosevic,et al.  Long-term longitudinal modifications in mesopic microperimetry in early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration , 2017, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[15]  B. Roska,et al.  Emerging therapies for inherited retinal degeneration , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[16]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Cross-sectional evaluation of microperimetric fixation location and stability in Stargardt disease in the ProgStar study , 2016 .

[17]  J. Sahel,et al.  Visual Acuity Loss and Associated Risk Factors in the Retrospective Progression of Stargardt Disease Study (ProgStar Report No. 2). , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Sahel,et al.  The Natural History of the Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) Studies: Design and Baseline Characteristics: ProgStar Report No. 1. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[19]  P. Melillo,et al.  Macular function and morphologic features in juvenile stargardt disease: longitudinal study. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Sahel,et al.  Gene therapy arrives at the macula , 2014, The Lancet.

[21]  R. Ritch,et al.  Optic disc progression and rates of visual field change in treated glaucoma , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[22]  W. Feuer,et al.  The Impact of Surgical Intraocular Pressure Reduction on Visual Function Using Various Criteria to Define Visual Field Progression , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[23]  T. Aleman,et al.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  L. da Cruz,et al.  NIDEK MP1 IS ABLE TO DETECT SUBTLE DECLINE IN FUNCTION IN INHERITED AND AGE-RELATED ATROPHIC MACULAR DISEASE WITH STABLE VISUAL ACUITY , 2011, Retina.

[25]  F. Ferris,et al.  Treatment of geographic atrophy by the topical administration of OT-551: results of a phase II clinical trial. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  G. Rubin,et al.  Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  Hendrik P N Scholl,et al.  Reading performance is reduced by parafoveal scotomas in patients with macular telangiectasia type 2. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  J. Sunness,et al.  RETINAL FUNCTION AND LOSS OF AUTOFLUORESCENCE IN STARGARDT DISEASE , 2008, Retina.

[29]  J. Sunness What you see is not always what you get in atrophic macular disease. , 2008, Retinal cases & brief reports.

[30]  P. Charbel Issa,et al.  Microperimetric assessment of patients with type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.