Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers.

What you have seen before helps you see it again. This effect has been shown in visual search studies looking at the consequence of the previous trial: Reaction times are shorter when the features defining a target and distractors are repeated. Here, I explore whether this bias in attentional selection occurs automatically or whether it depends upon the current goals of observers. Participants performed a visual search task, in which both a color singleton and a shape singleton appeared in the search array. The observers were instructed at the beginning of every trial as to which singleton was relevant. The data show that repeating the color or shape from the previous trial benefits performance only when this information is relevant to the observers' current goals.

[1]  J. P. Vroom,et al.  Advances in Psychology. , 1998, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[2]  J. Deese Principles of Psychology , 1923, Nature.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[6]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[7]  John K. Tsotsos Analyzing vision at the complexity level , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .

[17]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[18]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  M. Jeannerod The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  G. Caputo,et al.  Attentional selection by distractor suppression , 1998, Vision Research.

[24]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[25]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Conscious vs. unconscious perception , 2000 .

[27]  A. Hillstrom Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[29]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Visual attention and cortical circuits , 2001 .

[31]  Nilli Lavie The role of capacity limits in selective attention: behavioural evidence and implications for neural activity , 2001 .

[32]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  B. Gibson,et al.  Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology , 2001 .

[35]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  7 – Attention Capture, Orienting, and Awareness , 2001 .

[36]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[38]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Masking Interrupts Figure-Ground Signals in V1 , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[40]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Gazzaniga,et al.  29 Short-Term Memory for the Rapid Deployment of Visual Attention , 2004 .

[44]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  D. Schacter,et al.  Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning , 2004, Nature.

[46]  H. Pashler,et al.  Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Expectation and repetition effects in searching for featural singletons in very brief displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Neurobiology of Attention , 2005 .

[50]  Arni Kristjansson,et al.  Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Attention Capture: The Interplay of Expectations, Attention, and Awareness , 2005 .

[52]  J. Theeuwes Irrelevant Singletons Capture Attention , 2005 .

[53]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[54]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Á. Kristjánsson Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task , 2006, Vision Research.

[56]  A. Allport,et al.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  I. Koch,et al.  Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .

[60]  C. Olivers,et al.  On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven , 2006 .

[61]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[62]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[63]  W. N. Schoenfeld,et al.  Principles of Psychology , 2007 .