Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. P. Vroom,et al. Advances in Psychology. , 1998, Canadian Medical Association journal.
[2] J. Deese. Principles of Psychology , 1923, Nature.
[3] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[4] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[5] S Ullman,et al. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.
[6] Anne Treisman,et al. Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .
[7] John K. Tsotsos. Analyzing vision at the complexity level , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[8] S. Yantis,et al. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9] J. C. Johnston,et al. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[11] Y. Tsal,et al. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] R W Remington,et al. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] M. Goodale,et al. The visual brain in action , 1995 .
[15] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[16] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .
[17] N. Meiran. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .
[18] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[19] M. Jeannerod. The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[20] S. Yantis,et al. Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.
[21] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[22] R. Remington,et al. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] G. Caputo,et al. Attentional selection by distractor suppression , 1998, Vision Research.
[24] M. Gazzaniga,et al. The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .
[25] V. Lamme,et al. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.
[26] Philip M. Merikle,et al. Conscious vs. unconscious perception , 2000 .
[27] A. Hillstrom. Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[28] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .
[29] R. Klein,et al. Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] Joel L. Davis,et al. Visual attention and cortical circuits , 2001 .
[31] Nilli Lavie. The role of capacity limits in selective attention: behavioural evidence and implications for neural activity , 2001 .
[32] J. C. Johnston,et al. Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.
[33] Steven B. Most,et al. How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.
[34] B. Gibson,et al. Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology , 2001 .
[35] Daniel J. Simons,et al. 7 – Attention Capture, Orienting, and Awareness , 2001 .
[36] N. P. Bichot,et al. Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[37] I.. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .
[38] H. Spekreijse,et al. Masking Interrupts Figure-Ground Signals in V1 , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[39] DeLiang Wang,et al. The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.
[40] Jillian H. Fecteau,et al. Exploring the consequences of the previous trial , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[41] J. Wolfe,et al. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] S. Monsell. Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[43] Gazzaniga,et al. 29 Short-Term Memory for the Rapid Deployment of Visual Attention , 2004 .
[44] Jillian H. Fecteau,et al. Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[45] D. Schacter,et al. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning , 2004, Nature.
[46] H. Pashler,et al. Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[47] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[48] Harold Pashler,et al. Expectation and repetition effects in searching for featural singletons in very brief displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[49] John K. Tsotsos,et al. Neurobiology of Attention , 2005 .
[50] Arni Kristjansson,et al. Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[51] Michael S. Ambinder,et al. Attention Capture: The Interplay of Expectations, Attention, and Awareness , 2005 .
[52] J. Theeuwes. Irrelevant Singletons Capture Attention , 2005 .
[53] Steven B. Most,et al. What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.
[54] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[55] Á. Kristjánsson. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task , 2006, Vision Research.
[56] A. Allport,et al. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[57] Jillian H. Fecteau,et al. Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[58] I. Koch,et al. Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[59] Christian N. L. Olivers,et al. Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .
[60] C. Olivers,et al. On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven , 2006 .
[61] Alva Noë,et al. Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.
[62] M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.
[63] W. N. Schoenfeld,et al. Principles of Psychology , 2007 .